Cables, Conductors & Insulators Patent litigation record

Technology 25 cases

25 cases on record in Cables, Conductors & Insulators. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

25 cases on record

Cases on record
25
Classification
H01B7/00 · H01B11/06 · H01B7/40 · H01B7/08 · H01B13/00 · H01B13/02 · H01B13/04 · H01B11/02 · H01B11/04 · H01B7/18 · H01B11/08 · H01B11/10 · H01B11/18 · H01B11/00 · H01B9/02 · H01B11/20 · H01R12/53 · H01R13/58 · H01B5/02 · H01B5/08 · H01F27/28 · H01F5/00 · H01F5/04 · H01F27/32 · H01F41/06 · H01F41/12 · H05B44/00 · H01B17/26 · H02G1/08 · H01B17/30 · H02G3/08 · B63B35/03 · H01R13/60 · B65H59/00
Courts involved
N.D. Tex. · N.D. Cal. · W.D. Tex. · Fed. Cir. · C.D. Cal. · N.D. Ill. · S.D. Fla. · W.D. Wash. · M.D. Fla. · United States International Trade Commission · D. Del. · E.D. Tex. · S.D. Cal. · N.D. Ga. · D. Conn.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
3:26-cv-01051 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. TXS Industrial Design Inc N.D. Tex. 1 Apr 2026 156 d Case Settled
5:26-cv-02722 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Logitech, S.A. N.D. Cal. 27 Mar 2026 118 d Voluntary dismissal
1:25-cv-00942 Reaction Labs LLC v. Shenzhen Jinchi Technology Co., Ltd. W.D. Tex. 19 Jun 2025 294 d Dismissed without Prejudice
1:25-cv-00458 Reaction Labs LLC v. Liquipel, LLC W.D. Tex. 27 Mar 2025 174 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1441 Belden Technologies, Inc. v. CommScope Holding Co, Inc. Fed. Cir. 13 Feb 2025 41 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1428 CommScope Holding Co, Inc. v. Belden Technologies, Inc. Fed. Cir. 10 Feb 2025 501 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-08737 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Belkin C.D. Cal. 10 Oct 2024 189 d Case Dismissed
1:24-cv-03242 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Salom America Company N.D. Ill. 23 Apr 2024 237 d Case Dismissed
0:23-cv-61959 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc. S.D. Fla. 13 Oct 2023 216 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:23-cv-01003 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Fantasia Trading, LLC W.D. Wash. 6 Jul 2023 300 d Dismissed with Prejudice
8:23-cv-01348 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Zagg Intellectual Property Holding Co M.D. Fla. 15 Jun 2023 123 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:19-cv-07355 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Superior Communications, Inc. C.D. Cal. 23 Aug 2019 852 d Voluntary dismissal
2018-2093 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Superior Communications, Inc. Fed. Cir. 20 Jun 2018 1294 d Closed
337-TA-1064 3M Company v. Amphenol (Xiamen) High Speed Cable Co., Ltd. United States International Trade Commission 7 Aug 2017 263 d Closed
1:17-cv-00360 3M Company v. Amphenol Corp. D. Del. 3 Apr 2017 395 d Voluntary dismissal
2017-1826 Goto Denshi Co., Ltd. v. Mitsubishi Cable Industries, Ltd. Fed. Cir. 23 Mar 2017 384 d Closed
2:16-cv-01181 VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility, LLC E.D. Tex. 19 Oct 2016 1890 d Voluntary dismissal
2016-2728 Yongjiang Yin and Shenzhen El Lighting Co., Ltd. v. Sure-Fire Electrical Corporation Fed. Cir. 29 Sep 2016 410 d Closed
2016-2686 Yongjiang Yin and Shenzhen El Lighting Co., Ltd. v. Sure-Fire Electrical Corporation Fed. Cir. 22 Sep 2016 417 d Closed
3:16-cv-01857 Zipbuds, LLC v. 2X Mobile, Inc. S.D. Cal. 21 Jul 2016 84 d Likely Settlement
1:15-cv-00693 Southwire Company, LLC v. CME Wire & Cable, Inc. N.D. Ga. 9 Mar 2015 46 d Voluntary dismissal
2:14-cv-09815 Goto Denshi Co., Ltd. v. Mitsubishi Cable Industries, Ltd. C.D. Cal. 23 Dec 2014 1618 d Voluntary dismissal
3:14-cv-00786 Wiremold, Co. v. Mono-Systems, Inc. D. Conn. 30 May 2014 228 d Procedural Outcome
1:12-cv-01491 Nexans, Inc. v. Belden, Inc. D. Del. 19 Nov 2012 1361 d Likely Settlement
3:11-cv-00101 Southwire Company, LLC v. Encore Wire Corporation N.D. Ga. 21 Jun 2011 1591 d Case Stayed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Cables, Conductors & Insulators. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.