Digital Information Transmission and Coding & Code Conversion Patent litigation record

Technology 13 cases

13 cases on record in Digital Information Transmission and Coding & Code Conversion. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

13 cases on record

Cases on record
13
Classification
H04L12/413 · H04L29/06 · H04L12/407 · H04L12/56 · H04L49/90 · H03M13/09 · H03M13/00 · H04L12/66 · H04Q11/04 · H04L29/08
Courts involved
E.D. Tex.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
4:17-cv-00141 Plectrum, LLC v. Oracle Corporation E.D. Tex. 24 Feb 2017 120 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00120 Plectrum, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. E.D. Tex. 20 Feb 2017 217 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00121 Plectrum, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation E.D. Tex. 20 Feb 2017 124 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00123 Plectrum, LLC v. Comcast Corporation E.D. Tex. 20 Feb 2017 221 d Voluntary dismissal
4:17-cv-00125 Plectrum, LLC v. NEC Corporation of America E.D. Tex. 20 Feb 2017 124 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00126 Plectrum, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc. E.D. Tex. 20 Feb 2017 124 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00081 Plectrum, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. E.D. Tex. 3 Feb 2017 143 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00082 Plectrum, LLC v. Fortinet, Inc. E.D. Tex. 3 Feb 2017 224 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00083 Plectrum, LLC v. Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. E.D. Tex. 3 Feb 2017 143 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00084 Plectrum, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. E.D. Tex. 3 Feb 2017 141 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00077 Plectrum, LLC v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. E.D. Tex. 2 Feb 2017 144 d Likely Settlement
4:17-cv-00078 Plectrum, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. E.D. Tex. 2 Feb 2017 26 d Voluntary dismissal
4:17-cv-00079 Plectrum, LLC v. Extreme Networks, Inc. E.D. Tex. 2 Feb 2017 142 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Digital Information Transmission and Coding & Code Conversion. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.