Dispensing Liquids Patent litigation record

Technology 21 cases

21 cases on record in Dispensing Liquids. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
Classification
B67D7/70 · B01F5/06 · B05C17/005 · B67D7/74 · B67D7/78 · B67D7/80 · G01F11/20 · G01F11/10 · B67D7/40 · B67D7/32 · B67D7/36 · B67D7/84 · B67D7/04 · B60P3/035 · B67D7/62 · B62D63/08 · E21B43/26 · B67D7/34 · B67D7/14 · F16K31/26 · B67D5/52 · B67D1/12 · B67D1/00 · B67D1/08 · B67D1/04 · G01F11/06 · B67D7/08 · B67D1/07 · A47G19/00 · A47G19/12 · A47G19/22 · B67D5/62 · B67D1/06 · B67D1/14 · B65D47/32 · B67D3/00 · B65D45/06 · B65D81/20 · B65D25/48 · B65D25/28 · B67D5/08 · B67D5/14 · G07C5/00 · G07F13/00 · G07F7/02 · G06Q20/00 · G07F13/02 · G07F7/00 · B67D7/42 · G06Q20/04 · G06Q20/34 · G06Q50/06 · B67D5/37 · G07C5/08 · G06K7/00 · G06K17/00
Courts involved
Fed. Cir. · E.D.N.Y. · D. Del. · E.D. Tex. · W.D. Tex. · W.D. Va. · United States International Trade Commission · D. Or.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
24-1516 Medmix Switzerland AG v. Xinial Systems GMBH & Co. Kg Fed. Cir. 29 Feb 2024 837 d Unpatentable
1:21-cv-06279 Baby Brezza Enterprises, LLC v. HousingEZ, Inc. E.D.N.Y. 11 Nov 2021 420 d Consent Judgment
1:21-cv-01007 Fuel Automation Station, LLC v. Comanche Gas Solutions, LLC D. Del. 9 Jul 2021 115 d Voluntary dismissal
4:21-cv-00324 Chemoil Corporation v. Profuel, LLC E.D. Tex. 6 May 2021 176 d Voluntary dismissal
1:21-cv-00245 Graco, Inc. v. Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC D. Del. 22 Feb 2021 402 d Closed
6:20-cv-00828 Chemoil Corporation v. Profuel, LLC W.D. Tex. 10 Sep 2020 237 d Case Transferred
5:20-cv-00017 Sestra Systems, Inc. v. BarTrack, Inc. W.D. Va. 3 Mar 2020 279 d Likely Settlement
1:19-cv-00637 Think Tank Innovations, LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company E.D. Tex. 26 Dec 2019 84 d Voluntary dismissal
4:19-cv-00938 Think Tank Innovations, LLC v. Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. E.D. Tex. 26 Dec 2019 203 d Voluntary dismissal
337-TA-1130 Heineken International B.V. v. Anheuser-Busch InBev, S.A. United States International Trade Commission 5 Sep 2018 553 d Closed
2018-1878 Drink Tanks Corporation v. GrowlerWerks, Inc. Fed. Cir. 25 Apr 2018 168 d Closed
3:16-cv-00410 Drink Tanks Corporation v. GrowlerWerks, Inc. D. Or. 7 Mar 2016 981 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-01054 Drink Tanks Corporation v. GrowlerWerks, Inc. D. Del. 16 Nov 2015 112 d Case Transferred
1:14-cv-01122 Rydex Technologies, LLC v. KenntekPOS, LLC D. Del. 3 Sep 2014 135 d Voluntary dismissal
1:14-cv-01123 Rydex Technologies, LLC v. Acme Cash Register Company D. Del. 3 Sep 2014 135 d Voluntary dismissal
2013-1462 Rydex, Ltd. v. Ford Motor Company Fed. Cir. 24 Jun 2013 604 d Closed
2013-1463 Rydex, Ltd. v. Ford Motor Company Fed. Cir. 24 Jun 2013 604 d Closed
1:13-cv-00664 Rydex Technologies, LLC v. Baxter International, Inc. D. Del. 16 Apr 2013 973 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-00665 Rydex Technologies, LLC v. CareFusion Corporation D. Del. 16 Apr 2013 997 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-00667 Rydex Technologies, LLC v. Haemonetics Corporation D. Del. 16 Apr 2013 1021 d Likely Settlement
1:13-cv-00668 Rydex Technologies, LLC v. Hospira, Inc. D. Del. 16 Apr 2013 1126 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Dispensing Liquids. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.