Electric Digital Data Processing and Signalling & Alarm Systems Patent litigation record

Technology 14 cases

14 cases on record in Electric Digital Data Processing and Signalling & Alarm Systems. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

14 cases on record

Cases on record
14
Classification
G06F7/04 · G06F21/60 · H04L9/06 · H04L9/12 · H04L9/16 · H04L9/32 · H04L29/06 · G08B13/14 · G06K7/08 · H01Q5/10 · G06F3/0488 · H04B1/3827 · G06F3/0346 · G06F3/0483 · A63F13/28 · G06F3/0484 · G06F3/01 · G08B6/00 · G06T19/00 · G06F1/26 · G08B21/00 · G06F3/041 · G08B13/08 · G01R27/26 · G06F3/045 · G06F3/044 · G06F17/00 · G06N5/00 · G08B1/08 · G01C21/00 · G06F7/00 · G06Q30/02 · G08G1/0962 · G08G1/0967 · G08G1/123 · H04Q7/20 · G06F17/30 · G06F15/177 · G08B29/00 · G09F25/00 · H04L12/28 · H03K17/94 · H03M11/00 · G06F15/173 · H04L41/00 · G08B23/00 · G08B13/22 · G08B25/00 · G08B25/08 · G08B25/10 · G08B26/00 · G08B27/00
Courts involved
D. Colo. · W.D. Tex. · D. Del. · D. Mass. · N.D. Cal. · Fed. Cir. · C.D. Cal. · E.D. Tex.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:23-cv-01256 HID Global, Corp. v. WaveLynx Technologies Corporation D. Colo. 19 May 2023 67 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-00541 Immersion, Corp. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. W.D. Tex. 26 May 2022 371 d Case Transferred
1:22-cv-00362 HID Global, Corp. v. WaveLynx Technologies Corporation D. Del. 21 Mar 2022 424 d Case Transferred
1:20-cv-10620 Wildlife Acoustics, Inc. v. Frontier Labs Pty., Ltd. D. Mass. 27 Mar 2020 585 d Procedural Outcome
3:20-cv-01179 Neodron, Ltd. v. Motorola Mobility, LLC N.D. Cal. 14 Feb 2020 336 d Likely Settlement
6:20-cv-00122 Neodron, Ltd. v. Sony Corporation W.D. Tex. 14 Feb 2020 326 d Likely Settlement
4:19-cv-06990 Corrino Holdings, LLC v. Booking Holdings, Inc. N.D. Cal. 25 Oct 2019 82 d Voluntary dismissal
2019-2419 Alarm.com, Inc. v. SecureNet Technologies, LLC Fed. Cir. 20 Sep 2019 118 d Closed
2:18-cv-08541 Corrino Holdings, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. C.D. Cal. 4 Oct 2018 102 d Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-08544 Corrino Holdings, LLC v. Foursquare Labs, Inc. C.D. Cal. 4 Oct 2018 131 d Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-08546 Corrino Holdings, LLC v. Instagram, Inc. C.D. Cal. 4 Oct 2018 98 d Likely Settlement
2:18-cv-08548 Corrino Holdings, LLC v. Snap, Inc. C.D. Cal. 4 Oct 2018 91 d Likely Settlement
2:17-cv-00608 Alarm.com, Inc. v. ipDatatel, LLC E.D. Tex. 24 Aug 2017 302 d Case Transferred
1:14-cv-01199 iControl Networks, Inc. v. Zonoff, Inc. D. Del. 16 Sep 2014 1147 d Other
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Electric Digital Data Processing and Signalling & Alarm Systems. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.