Patent Litigation in Force & Pressure Measurement

13 cases on record

Cases on record: 13
Classification: G01L5/00 · G01P15/03 · H01H35/14 · G01P15/00 · G01P15/04 · G01P15/02 · H01H9/16 · G01N3/30 · G01L23/00 · G01L27/00 · G01M3/28 · G01M3/26 · G01M3/24 · G01L7/00 · G01L3/16 · A63B69/32 · G01L9/00
Courts involved: W.D. Tex. · Fed. Cir. · C.D. Cal. · D. Del. · N.D. Cal. · N.D. Ill. · W.D.N.Y. · D. Ariz.

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
1:23-cv-01450	Shockwatch, Inc. v. Wan-yo Enterprise Co., Ltd.	W.D. Tex.	29 Nov 2023	0 d	Case Terminated
6:23-cv-00819	Shockwatch, Inc. v. Wan-yo Enterprise Co., Ltd.	W.D. Tex.	29 Nov 2023	342 d	Dismissed without Prejudice
2022-1315	Innovative Pressure Testing, LLC v. Offshore Technical Compliance, LLC	Fed. Cir.	3 Jan 2022	155 d	Closed
2:21-cv-02446	Meissner Filtration Products, Inc. v. Sani-Tech West, Inc.	C.D. Cal.	19 Mar 2021	94 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-00899	Medal Sports Corporation v. EastPoint Sports, Ltd.	D. Del.	1 Jul 2020	160 d	Voluntary dismissal
2019-2271	Blacoh Fluid Control, Inc. v. Syrinix, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	14 Aug 2019	152 d	Closed
2019-2272	Blacoh Fluid Control, Inc. v. Syrinix, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	14 Aug 2019	152 d	Closed
2019-2236	Syrinix, Inc. v. Blacoh Fluid Control, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	7 Aug 2019	159 d	Closed
2019-2222	Syrinix, Inc. v. Blacoh Fluid Control, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	2 Aug 2019	164 d	Closed
5:17-cv-04007	Blacoh Fluid Controls, Inc. v. Syrinix, Inc.	N.D. Cal.	17 Jul 2017	913 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-08276	Medal Sports Corporation v. Franklin Sports, Inc.	N.D. Ill.	21 Sep 2015	332 d	Likely Settlement
6:14-cv-06590	Pipeline Technologies Incorporated v. Telog Instruments Incorporated	W.D.N.Y.	16 Oct 2014	294 d	Likely Settlement
2:13-cv-02104	Pipeline Technologies Incorporated v. Telog Instruments Incorporated	D. Ariz.	16 Oct 2013	491 d	Likely Settlement

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Force & Pressure Measurement. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Force & Pressure Measurement Patent litigation record

13 cases on record

Where the claim space is crowded