Hand Carts & Trolleys Patent litigation record

Technology 34 cases

34 cases on record in Hand Carts & Trolleys. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

34 cases on record

Cases on record
34
Classification
B62B3/02 · A61G12/00 · B62B5/04 · B62B3/14 · B62B5/00 · H04W4/024 · G08B13/24 · B60K25/08 · B60T7/18 · G01C21/00 · G01C21/12 · G06Q10/08 · G08G1/00 · H02K7/18 · H04W4/029 · A47F10/04 · B60T7/16 · G01C21/20 · G06K7/10 · H04W4/02 · B62B1/12 · B65D43/16 · B62B1/20 · B65D51/28 · B65D43/22 · B65D25/04 · B65D25/28 · B65D81/38 · B62B5/06 · F25D3/08 · A45C11/20 · A45C13/02 · B62B1/22 · B62B9/04 · B62B7/08 · B62B7/00 · B62B5/08 · B62B3/00 · B62B9/28 · B62B7/10
Courts involved
N.D. Cal. · C.D. Cal. · Fed. Cir. · N.D. Ill. · S.D.N.Y. · W.D. Wash. · D.N.J. · United States International Trade Commission · D. Colo. · D. Minn. · N.D. Ohio
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
3:25-cv-05344 iBeauty Limited Company v. dbest products, Inc. N.D. Cal. 26 Jun 2025 68 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04566 dbest products, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 77 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04583 dbest products, Inc. v. iBeauty Limited Company C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 75 d Case Dismissed
2:25-cv-04586 dbest products, Inc. v. Dongguan Laiyang Trading Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 107 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04587 dbest products, Inc. v. Guangzhou Linyu Trading Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 107 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04588 Dbest Products Inc. v. Guangzhou Lincan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 107 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04591 dbest products, Inc. v. Aborder Products, Inc. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 69 d Case Consolidated
2:25-cv-04592 dbest products, Inc. v. Yuhuanhongshengmaoyiyouxianggongsi C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 100 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04597 Dbest Products Inc. v. Jieyang Juxiaonian Trading Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 118 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04601 dbest products, Inc. v. Guangzhou Nafenai Trading Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 117 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04603 DBEST Produscts, Inc. v. Huzhou Shunji E-Commerce Company, Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 100 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04606 dbest products, Inc. v. Zhejiang Xinmao Plastie Industry Company, Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 102 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04608 Dbest Products Inc. v. Shanghai Yiyuren Technology Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 113 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:25-cv-04610 dbest products, Inc. v. enan Yiqi Tech Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 100 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04613 dbest products, Inc. v. Luoyang Muzhou Department Store Sales Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 99 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04614 dbest products, Inc. v. Hangzhou Alfa Trading Company, Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 102 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04615 dbest products, Inc. v. Wuhan Zhidan Network Tech. Company C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 100 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04617 Dbest Products Inc. v. Wuhan Lanzhi Network Technology Company Ltd. C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 99 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-04619 dbest products, Inc. v. Guangzhou Nanzhoukeji Youxiangongsi C.D. Cal. 21 May 2025 100 d Case Dismissed
25-1676 Capsa Solutions, LLC v. Howard Industries, Inc. Fed. Cir. 23 Apr 2025 99 d Appeal Dismissed
1:25-cv-03324 EnHomee-Direct v. Dbest Products Inc. N.D. Ill. 28 Mar 2025 172 d Judgment on the merits for Defendant
2:25-cv-02311 WUHAN ZHIDAN NETWORK TECHNOLOGY Co. Ltd. v. dbest products, Inc. C.D. Cal. 14 Mar 2025 173 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-10045 Sanders Collection Inc. v. dbest products, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 31 Dec 2024 129 d Voluntary dismissal
7:24-cv-10019 Yuhuanhongshengmaoyiyouxiangongsi v. dbest products, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 30 Dec 2024 246 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:24-cv-13287 jinhuanshiyehedianzishangwuyouxiangonsi v. Dbest Products Inc. N.D. Ill. 27 Dec 2024 62 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-10842 Taizhou Luqiao Shengqiang Housewares Factory v. Dbest Products Inc. C.D. Cal. 17 Dec 2024 225 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-02043 Shenzhen Yihong Technology Co Ltd v. dbest products, Inc. W.D. Wash. 11 Dec 2024 231 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:24-cv-04523 Ecr4kids, LP v. dbest products, Inc. C.D. Cal. 30 May 2024 103 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:23-cv-02675 Ecr4kids, LP v. dbest products, Inc. D.N.J. 17 May 2023 372 d Case Terminated
337-TA-1357 Gatekeeper Systems, Inc. v. Rocateq International, BV United States International Trade Commission 8 Mar 2023 218 d Case Settled
1:22-cv-05527 Capsa Solutions, LLC v. Simplifi Medical, LLC N.D. Ill. 7 Oct 2022 1029 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:22-cv-01986 California Innovations, Inc. v. Ice Rover, Inc. D. Colo. 9 Aug 2022 678 d Dismissed with Prejudice
0:22-cv-01767 Wintech, LLC v. Polaris, Inc. D. Minn. 12 Jul 2022 203 d Voluntary dismissal
3:20-cv-00030 Evenflo Company, Inc. v. Veer Gear, LLC N.D. Ohio 27 Jan 2020 1241 d Dismissed with Prejudice
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Hand Carts & Trolleys. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.