Image Data Processing & Generation and Electric Digital Data Processing Patent litigation record

Technology 20 cases

20 cases on record in Image Data Processing & Generation and Electric Digital Data Processing. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

20 cases on record

Cases on record
20
Classification
G06T19/00 · G06T15/04 · G06T15/10 · G06F3/01 · G06F3/0484 · G06F30/13 · G06F3/0346 · G02B27/01 · G06F17/00 · G06T9/00 · H04N7/26 · H04N7/32 · H03M7/36 · H04N7/50 · G06F3/00 · G06F15/16 · G06F40/191 · H04N23/40 · H04W4/20 · H04N7/36 · G06T1/00 · G09G5/00 · G06Q30/02 · H04N13/363 · G06T15/00 · G06T15/50 · G06T15/80 · G06F1/035 · G06F1/02 · G06T11/40 · G06T17/20 · G06T1/20 · G09G5/36 · G06T17/00 · G06F13/00 · G06F12/00 · H04N19/60 · H04N1/32 · H04N1/387 · H04N7/08 · H04N7/081 · H04N19/102 · H04N19/134 · H04N19/176 · H04N19/423 · H04N19/467 · H04N19/70 · G06F1/00 · G06F21/00 · G06F7/04 · B41K3/38 · G06F11/30 · G06F12/14 · G06F15/177 · G06F17/30 · G06F9/00 · G06F9/24 · G06K9/36 · H04L9/32 · H04N7/16 · H04L9/00 · H03M7/30 · H03M7/34 · G06F13/12 · H03M7/46 · G06T15/20 · G06F3/033 · G06F3/048 · G06Q40/00 · G06Q50/22 · G06T11/60 · G06K15/00 · G06F3/12 · G06F17/24
Courts involved
N.D. Ill. · C.D. Cal. · N.D. Cal. · United States International Trade Commission · D. Del. · E.D. Tex. · S.D. Cal. · W.D. Tex. · M.D. Fla.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:20-cv-04637 Dirtt Environmental Solutions, Ltd. v. Falkbuilt, Ltd. N.D. Ill. 6 Aug 2020 558 d Voluntary dismissal
8:18-cv-01899 Uniloc 2017, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. C.D. Cal. 23 Oct 2018 25 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-02955 Barbaro Technologies, LLC v. Niantic, Inc. N.D. Cal. 18 May 2018 880 d Judgment on the Merits
337-TA-1099 ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd. v. Asus Computer International, Inc. United States International Trade Commission 5 Feb 2018 394 d Closed
2:18-cv-00773 Barbaro Technologies, LLC v. Niantic, Inc. C.D. Cal. 30 Jan 2018 107 d Case Transferred
1:17-cv-01863 ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd. v. Nvidia, Corp. D. Del. 27 Dec 2017 408 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-01370 ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd. v. Nvidia, Corp. D. Del. 2 Oct 2017 494 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-01113 Marking Object Virtualization Intelligence, LLC v. STMicroelectronics, Inc. E.D. Tex. 7 Oct 2016 96 d Voluntary dismissal
3:16-cv-01836 RealTime Data, LLC v. Teradata Corporation N.D. Cal. 8 Apr 2016 40 d Voluntary dismissal
3:15-cv-01133 ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. S.D. Cal. 20 May 2015 29 d Procedural Outcome
6:15-cv-00463 RealTime Data, LLC v. Actian Corporation E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 943 d Procedural Outcome
6:15-cv-00464 RealTime Data, LLC v. BMC Software, Inc. E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 150 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00465 RealTime Data, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 290 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00466 RealTime Data, LLC v. Echostar Corporation E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 1376 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00467 RealTime Data, LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 738 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00468 RealTime Data, LLC v. Riverbed Technology, Inc. E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 1313 d Out-of-court Settlement
6:15-cv-00469 RealTime Data, LLC v. SAP America, Inc. E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 452 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-00470 RealTime Data, LLC v. Teradata Corporation E.D. Tex. 8 May 2015 335 d Case Transferred
1:11-cv-00073 Maxus Strategic Systems, Inc. v. Aqumin, LLC W.D. Tex. 24 Jan 2011 1745 d Likely Settlement
6:10-cv-00909 Tesseron, Ltd. v. Punch International, NV M.D. Fla. 10 Jun 2010 2099 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Image Data Processing & Generation and Electric Digital Data Processing. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.