Locks & Keys Patent litigation record

Technology 32 cases

32 cases on record in Locks & Keys. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

32 cases on record

Cases on record
32
Classification
E05B59/00 · E05B13/10 · E05B81/24 · E05B85/22 · E05C1/14 · E05B81/66 · E05B81/82 · E05B47/02 · E05B17/10 · E05B85/18 · E05B17/00 · E05B83/44 · E05B81/18 · E05B81/06 · E05B63/14 · E05B47/00 · G07C9/00 · E05B65/08 · E05C21/02 · E05C19/18 · E05C17/60 · E05C17/04 · E05C17/54 · E05B15/02 · E05B43/00 · F25D23/02 · E05B47/06 · E05B65/00 · E05B73/00 · E05B63/00 · E05B63/06 · E05B65/02 · E05B45/06 · G08B13/24 · G08B13/14 · G08B25/00 · G08B13/12 · E05B63/24 · E05B55/00 · A47F7/024 · E05B27/00 · G06F1/16 · G06F21/86 · A47F3/00 · G06F21/88 · A47B23/04 · E05B65/48 · E05B37/00 · E05B37/02 · E05B37/12 · E05B53/00 · E05B67/24 · E05B67/00 · G07F17/12 · G07F17/10 · E05B3/00 · E05B1/00 · E05B85/10 · E05B85/14 · E05B67/36 · E05B67/38 · E05B · E05B37/06
Courts involved
D. Utah · D.N.J. · D. Ariz. · W.D. Tex. · U.S. Supreme Court · Fed. Cir. · N.D. Cal. · E.D.N.Y. · S.D.N.Y. · W.D.N.C. · W.D. Mich. · D. Colo. · C.D. Cal. · D. Del. · Columbia District Court
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:26-cv-00132 Zhongchengguoda (Shenzhen) Qiyefazhanyouxiangongsi v. RVLock & Co D. Utah 13 Feb 2026 147 d Case Dismissed
2:25-cv-00676 Aubes E-Commerce (Shanghai) v. RVLock & Co. D. Utah 12 Aug 2025 1 d Case Terminated
3:24-cv-10544 Suzhou Hupan Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. Accession Inc. D.N.J. 16 Nov 2024 163 d Voluntary dismissal
2:23-cv-00069 Hanchett Entry Systems, Inc. v. Camden Marketing Incorporated D. Ariz. 11 Jan 2023 110 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-00275 Triteq Lock & Security, LLC v. Minus Forty Technologies, Corp. W.D. Tex. 23 Mar 2022 22 d Case Transferred
6:22-cv-00378 Triteq Lock & Security, LLC v. Minus Forty Technologies Corp. W.D. Tex. 23 Mar 2022 379 d Case Dismissed
20-1380 Security People, Inc. v. Drew Hirshfeld U.S. Supreme Court 1 Apr 2021 61 d Appeal Denied
2019-2118 Security People, Inc. v. Andrei Iancu Fed. Cir. 10 Jul 2019 407 d Closed
4:18-cv-06180 Security People, Inc. v. Andrei Iancu N.D. Cal. 9 Oct 2018 244 d Case Dismissed
2018-2202 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Fed. Cir. 31 Jul 2018 346 d Closed
2018-1898 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Fed. Cir. 30 Apr 2018 312 d Closed
2018-1889 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Fed. Cir. 26 Apr 2018 316 d Closed
2018-1304 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Fed. Cir. 18 Dec 2017 445 d Closed
2018-1238 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2017 463 d Closed
2018-1239 InVue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. Fed. Cir. 30 Nov 2017 463 d Closed
2:17-cv-03877 Hanchett Entry Systems, Inc. v. Rutherford Controls International, Inc. D. Ariz. 23 Oct 2017 373 d Likely Settlement
2018-1034 Mighton Products Limited v. Vision Industries Group, Inc. Fed. Cir. 11 Oct 2017 300 d Closed
2:17-cv-00693 Think Products, Inc. v. Acco Brands Corporation E.D.N.Y. 6 Feb 2017 29 d Voluntary dismissal
2017-1385 Security People, Inc. v. Ojmar US, LLC Fed. Cir. 21 Dec 2016 327 d Closed
1:16-cv-07113 Sinox Company, Ltd. v. Genius Brands, LLC S.D.N.Y. 12 Sep 2016 203 d Voluntary dismissal
3:16-cv-00553 Invue Security Products, Inc. v. Mobile Tech, Inc. W.D.N.C. 19 Jul 2016 16 d Other
1:16-cv-03932 Dog & Bone Holdings Pty, Ltd. v. Noke, LLC S.D.N.Y. 26 May 2016 798 d Likely Settlement
3:15-cv-02352 Security People, Inc. v. Ojmar US, LLC N.D. Cal. 27 May 2015 35 d Voluntary dismissal
5:15-cv-02355 Security People, Inc. v. Ojmar US, LLC N.D. Cal. 27 May 2015 34 d Voluntary dismissal
2:14-cv-00867 Kindig-It Design v. Creative Controls D. Utah 25 Nov 2014 1060 d Other
1:14-cv-01193 Fogg Filler Company v. Kaba Ilco Corporation W.D. Mich. 20 Nov 2014 147 d Voluntary dismissal
3:14-cv-04968 Security People, Inc. v. Ojmar US, LLC N.D. Cal. 10 Nov 2014 1326 d Closed
4:14-cv-04968 Security People, Inc. v. Ojmar US, LLC N.D. Cal. 10 Nov 2014 1326 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-02797 Sinox Company, Ltd. v. Wordlock, Inc. D. Colo. 10 Oct 2014 201 d Likely Settlement
2:14-cv-06371 Pacific Lock Company v. The Eastern Company C.D. Cal. 13 Aug 2014 341 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00626 Stanton Comcepts, LLC v. Brookstone, Inc. D. Del. 19 May 2014 1410 d Procedural Outcome
1:13-cv-01364 Fullyear-Brother Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. Stanton Comcepts, LLC Columbia District Court 10 Sep 2013 2096 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Locks & Keys. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.