Meteorology Patent litigation record

Technology 10 cases

10 cases on record in Meteorology. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

10 cases on record

Cases on record
10
Classification
G01W1/16 · G01R19/25 · G01W1/00 · G01D18/00 · A01G1/00 · G06F19/00 · G08B21/10
Courts involved
N.D. Cal. · E.D. Tex. · E.D. Wis. · N.D. Tex.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
4:20-cv-01094 Bicameral, LLC v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation N.D. Cal. 11 Feb 2020 254 d Closed
4:20-cv-00082 Bicameral, LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc. E.D. Tex. 4 Feb 2020 339 d Voluntary dismissal
2:17-cv-01173 Glenn Family, Inc. v. Combex, Inc. E.D. Wis. 29 Aug 2017 373 d Case Dismissed
2:16-cv-00897 Environment Sensor Systems, LLC v. Link 4, Corp. E.D. Tex. 12 Aug 2016 96 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00898 Environment Sensor Systems, LLC v. Swarm Technologies, LLC E.D. Tex. 12 Aug 2016 258 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00848 Environment Sensor Systems, LLC v. Soil IQ, Inc. E.D. Tex. 2 Aug 2016 217 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00857 Environment Sensor Systems, LLC v. Hisgadget, Inc. E.D. Tex. 2 Aug 2016 112 d Voluntary dismissal
2:16-cv-00480 Environment Sensor Systems, LLC v. Hunter Industries, Inc. E.D. Tex. 5 May 2016 181 d Voluntary dismissal
3:15-cv-01180 Avioniqs, LLC v. Rockwell Collins, Inc. N.D. Tex. 17 Apr 2015 203 d Likely Settlement
3:15-cv-00394 Avioniqs, LLC v. China Cargo Airlines, Ltd. N.D. Tex. 6 Feb 2015 70 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Meteorology. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.