Non-explosive Weapons (Bows etc.) Patent litigation record

Technology 25 cases

25 cases on record in Non-explosive Weapons (Bows etc.). Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

25 cases on record

Cases on record
25
Classification
F41B4/00 · A63H33/00 · F41B5/10 · F41B5/12 · F41B11/00 · F41B11/681 · F41B11/89 · F41B11/642 · F41B5/06 · F41B5/14 · F41C23/14 · F41B5/00 · F41B15/04 · F41B5/22 · F41B11/32 · F41B11/62 · F41B11/73 · F41B5/18 · F41B3/00 · F41B3/02
Courts involved
N.D. Ga. · M.D. Fla. · N.D. Ill. · Fed. Cir. · N.D. Ohio · W.D.N.Y. · D. Del. · United States International Trade Commission · D. Nev. · N.D. Cal. · S.D. Cal. · D. Or. · W.D. Wis. · D.N.J. · S.D. Ind. · E.D. Mich. · C.D. Cal. · W.D. Va.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:25-cv-05420 Zipstring, LLC v. Nxtgen Toys, LLC N.D. Ga. 22 Sep 2025 283 d Case Dismissed
8:25-cv-00197 McP IP, LLC v. Barnett Outdoors LLC M.D. Fla. 24 Jan 2025 192 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-09718 Lovitedo, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified In Schedule A N.D. Ill. 8 Oct 2024 225 d Default Judgment
24-2136 Ravin Crossbows, LLC v. HUNTER'S MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., dba TenPoint Crossbow Technologies Fed. Cir. 30 Jul 2024 737 d Unpatentable
5:23-cv-00598 Ravin Crossbows, LLC v. Hunter's Manufacturing Company, Inc. N.D. Ohio 21 Mar 2023 629 d Case Settled
1:23-cv-00189 Velocity Outdoor Inc. v. McP IP, LLC W.D.N.Y. 28 Feb 2023 63 d Case Dismissed
1:23-cv-00140 Darton Archery, LLC v. Bowtech, LLC D. Del. 6 Feb 2023 191 d Dismissed with Prejudice
337-TA-1325 Hasbro, Inc. v. Daisy Manufacturing Company United States International Trade Commission 21 Jul 2022 1246 d Case Settled
2:21-cv-02213 Ravin Crossbows, LLC v. Hunter D. Nev. 17 Dec 2021 459 d Case Transferred
2:21-cv-00581 McP IP, LLC v. .30-06 Outdoors N.D. Ohio 9 Feb 2021 758 d Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff
5:20-cv-06220 Crandall Technologies, LLC v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. N.D. Cal. 2 Sep 2020 55 d Closed
3:18-cv-01396 Crandall Technologies, LLC v. Greatcall, Inc. S.D. Cal. 25 Jun 2018 598 d Voluntary dismissal
6:18-cv-01087 McP IP, LLC v. Bowtech, Inc. D. Or. 21 Jun 2018 656 d Out-of-court Settlement
3:18-cv-00236 Beachfunds Patents, LLC v. H.H. & A. Sports, Inc. W.D. Wis. 5 Apr 2018 412 d Voluntary dismissal
6:17-cv-01896 McP IP, LLC v. Bowtech, Inc. D. Or. 27 Nov 2017 862 d Likely Settlement
1:17-cv-05590 G.I. Sportz, Inc. v. Valken, Inc. D.N.J. 2 Aug 2017 971 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-05040 GI Sportz, Inc. v. Valken, Inc. D.N.J. 10 Jul 2017 994 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-04924 GI Sportz Direct, LLC v. Valken, Inc. D.N.J. 5 Jul 2017 1 d Procedural Outcome
4:17-cv-03664 Crandall Technologies, LLC v. Medtronic, Inc. N.D. Cal. 27 Jun 2017 231 d Likely Settlement
5:16-cv-03075 Hunter's Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. SA Sports, LLC N.D. Ohio 27 Dec 2016 265 d Out-of-court Settlement
3:16-cv-00820 Precision Shooting Equipment, Inc. v. Ravin Crossbows, LLC W.D. Wis. 12 Dec 2016 309 d Likely Settlement
1:15-cv-00346 Sherrill, Inc. v. Treestuff, Inc. S.D. Ind. 27 Feb 2015 76 d Voluntary dismissal
2:14-cv-13931 Grace Engineering, Corp. v. Elite Outdoors, LLC E.D. Mich. 10 Oct 2014 181 d Voluntary dismissal
2:14-cv-07654 Sunworld Industrial Company Limited v. DYE Precision, Inc. C.D. Cal. 2 Oct 2014 362 d Judgment on the Merits
5:14-cv-00004 Parker Compound Bows, Inc. v. Hunter's Manufacturing Company, Inc. W.D. Va. 18 Feb 2014 800 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Non-explosive Weapons (Bows etc.). Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.