Portable & Transportable Lighting Patent litigation record

Technology 15 cases

15 cases on record in Portable & Transportable Lighting. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

15 cases on record

Cases on record
15
Classification
F21L4/00 · F21L4/04 · F21V17/06 · F21V1/06 · F21V1/16 · F21L4/02 · F21V23/04 · F21V21/14 · F21V17/10 · F21V23/02 · F21V31/00 · F21V15/01 · F21V15/00 · F21L14/00 · F21V14/04 · F21Y101/02 · H05B37/02 · H05B44/00 · F21V33/00 · F21V9/00
Courts involved
W.D. Wash. · W.D. Pa. · M.D. Fla. · S.D.N.Y. · D. Conn. · D. Del. · D. Mass. · D. Utah
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:25-cv-02261 Shenzhen Yilv Technology Co Ltd v. Hong Kong Xingtai International Trade Co Limited W.D. Wash. 13 Nov 2025 138 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:25-cv-02262 Shenzhen Hongxinshun Technology Co Ltd v. Hong Kong Xingtai International Trade Co Limited W.D. Wash. 13 Nov 2025 138 d Case Consolidated
2:25-cv-02263 Shenzhen Zhiying Technology Co Ltd v. Hong Kong Xingtai International Trade Co Limited W.D. Wash. 13 Nov 2025 138 d Case Consolidated
2:25-cv-02264 Suqian Zhenye Electronics Technology Co Ltd v. Hong Kong Xingtai International Trade Co Limited W.D. Wash. 13 Nov 2025 138 d Case Consolidated
2:25-cv-02265 Shenzhen Chunyan Technology Co Ltd v. Hong Kong Xingtai International Trade Co Limited W.D. Wash. 13 Nov 2025 138 d Case Consolidated
2:24-cv-02516 Allsop, Inc. v. QVC, Inc. W.D. Pa. 10 Jun 2024 149 d Dismissed with Prejudice
8:23-cv-00049 Lead Creation, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A M.D. Fla. 6 Jan 2023 63 d Voluntary dismissal
1:18-cv-07687 Seatriever International Holdings Limited v. Innova Imports, LLC S.D.N.Y. 23 Aug 2018 188 d Other
3:18-cv-00214 E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Halo2Cloud, LLC D. Conn. 5 Feb 2018 123 d Out-of-court Settlement
1:17-cv-00037 Streamlight, Inc. v. Sportsmans Guide, Inc. D. Del. 12 Jan 2017 63 d Voluntary dismissal
1:16-cv-06918 E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Telebrands, Corp. S.D.N.Y. 2 Sep 2016 294 d Voluntary dismissal
1:16-cv-11672 Brite-Strike Technologies, Inc. v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. D. Mass. 16 Aug 2016 311 d Likely Settlement
2:16-cv-00731 Alliance Sports Group v. Promier Products, Inc. D. Utah 27 Jun 2016 50 d Voluntary dismissal
1:15-cv-07391 Designs For Vision, Inc. v. General Scientific Corporation S.D.N.Y. 18 Sep 2015 1040 d Likely Settlement
1:14-cv-00171 Primos v. American Sports Licensing D. Utah 22 Dec 2014 24 d Voluntary dismissal
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Portable & Transportable Lighting. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.