30 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 30
- Classification
- H02J3/38 · C10L3/10 · G06Q20/06 · E21B43/16 · H02J3/40 · H02J3/00 · H02J7/00 · B60L50/64 · B60L58/14 · B60L58/18 · H01M10/42 · H01M10/613 · H01M10/625 · H01M10/6554 · H01M50/204 · H01M50/249 · H01M50/583 · H02J50/12 · H02J50/05 · H02J50/40 · H02J7/02 · H02J50/80 · H02J9/00 · H01M50/209 · H02J50/90 · H01F38/14 · H01Q1/24 · H01Q1/38 · H01Q1/52 · H01Q21/28 · H01Q7/06 · H02J50/00 · H02J50/10 · H02J4/25 · H01M2/10 · H02J5/00 · H02J9/06 · G05F1/66 · H02J3/28 · H02J3/14 · H02J13/00 · G06Q10/00 · G06F1/3203 · B60L11/18 · H02J7/34 · H02J1/00 · B60L3/00 · H01M10/0525 · H01M10/44 · B60L50/60 · F02N11/12 · B60L53/18 · H01R13/24 · H01R31/06 · H04B1/3827 · H02J50/20 · H01Q3/00 · H04B7/26 · B60L53/12 · H02J50/50 · H01F5/00 · B60L53/00 · B60L53/53 · H02J7/14 · H02J7/04 · H05B37/02 · H05B35/00
- Courts involved
- E.D. Tex. · D. Del. · W.D. Wash. · N.D. Tex. · N.D. Cal. · C.D. Cal. · Fed. Cir. · D. Colo. · S.D. Tex. · W.D. Tex. · D.N.J. · N.D. Ill. · D. Ariz. · N.D. Ohio · S.D. Ohio · M.D. Fla. · W.D.N.C.
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:25-cv-00743 | Crusoe Energy Systems LLC v. Upstream Data, Inc. | E.D. Tex. | 24 Jul 2025 | 97 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:25-cv-00921 | Proterra Powered LLC v. Estes Energy Solutions, Inc. | D. Del. | 22 Jul 2025 | 259 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:25-cv-00993 | Koji IP LLC v. Ossia Inc | W.D. Wash. | 23 May 2025 | 62 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:24-cv-03249 | Valtrus Innovations, Ltd. v. Google, LLC | N.D. Tex. | 27 Dec 2024 | 252 d | Case Stayed |
| 2:24-cv-00654 | Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. | E.D. Tex. | 9 Aug 2024 | 223 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 3:24-cv-03089 | Koji IP, LLC v. Renesas Electronics Corporation | N.D. Cal. | 22 May 2024 | 21 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 2:24-cv-03713 | Koji IP, LLC v. Guru Wireless, Inc. | C.D. Cal. | 3 May 2024 | 152 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 23-2410 | Causam Enterprises, Inc. v. Unified Patents, LLC | Fed. Cir. | 22 Sep 2023 | 714 d | Unpatentable |
| 1:23-cv-01674 | Koji IP, LLC v. Renesas Electronics America, Inc. | D. Colo. | 30 Jun 2023 | 68 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 4:23-cv-01798 | OBM, Inc. v. Lancium, LLC | S.D. Tex. | 16 May 2023 | 121 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 23-1884 | Shenzhen Chic Electrics Co., Ltd. v. Pilot, Inc. | Fed. Cir. | 12 May 2023 | 378 d | Case Dismissed |
| 6:23-cv-00196 | Swissdigital USA Co., Ltd. v. Samsonite International, SA | W.D. Tex. | 14 Mar 2023 | 468 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 4:23-cv-00554 | Noco, Co. v. Shenzhenshi Daosishangmao Youxiangongsi | S.D. Tex. | 14 Feb 2023 | 85 d | Case Stayed |
| 2:23-cv-00051 | VoltStar Technologies, Inc. v. Premier Accessory Group, LLC | D.N.J. | 5 Jan 2023 | 145 d | Case Dismissed |
| 23-1234 | Pilot, Inc. v. Noco, Co. | Fed. Cir. | 9 Dec 2022 | 531 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:22-cv-06661 | Waverly Licensing, LLC v. VisionTek Products, LLC | N.D. Ill. | 29 Nov 2022 | 111 d | Consent Judgment |
| 3:22-cv-02653 | Creekview IP, LLC v. Radioshack Online Opco, LLC | N.D. Tex. | 28 Nov 2022 | 129 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:22-cv-07908 | Creekview IP, LLC v. Hypercel, Corp. | C.D. Cal. | 31 Oct 2022 | 129 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:22-cv-07909 | Creekview IP, LLC v. Legrand, Inc. | C.D. Cal. | 31 Oct 2022 | 113 d | Case Settled |
| 6:22-cv-01144 | Waverly Licensing, LLC v. Power Integrations, Inc. | W.D. Tex. | 31 Oct 2022 | 116 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:22-cv-01532 | Waverly Licensing, LLC v. National Products, Inc. | W.D. Wash. | 27 Oct 2022 | 99 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:22-cv-00419 | Waverly Licensing, LLC v. Delta Electronics (Americas), Ltd. | E.D. Tex. | 25 Oct 2022 | 155 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:22-cv-00398 | Mojo Mobility, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | E.D. Tex. | 7 Oct 2022 | 895 d | Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff |
| 2:22-cv-00389 | Pilot Incorporated v. NOCO Company Incorporated | D. Ariz. | 14 Mar 2022 | 801 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 6:21-cv-00453 | Swissdigital USA Co., Ltd. v. Wenger, NA | W.D. Tex. | 30 Apr 2021 | 949 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 1:20-cv-01173 | Noco, Co. v. Nice Team Enterprise, Ltd. | N.D. Ohio | 28 May 2020 | 1660 d | Default Judgment |
| 2:20-cv-01356 | Noco, Co. v. Nekteck, Inc. | S.D. Ohio | 13 Mar 2020 | 1753 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:20-cv-01358 | Noco, Co. v. Medcursor, Inc. | S.D. Ohio | 13 Mar 2020 | 1753 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 6:20-cv-00050 | Noco, Co. v. Deltona Transformer, Corp. | M.D. Fla. | 9 Jan 2020 | 1805 d | Case Consolidated |
| 3:19-cv-00497 | SengLED USA, Inc. v. TVL International, LLC | W.D.N.C. | 2 Oct 2019 | 1197 d | Case Dismissed |
Where the claim space is crowded
Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.
Map this field- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.
Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.
Report an incorrect record
Tell us what is wrong on this page. The page address is included automatically.
Privacy request
For requests about your personal information on this page. The page address is included automatically.