Patent Litigation in Railway Traffic Control

11 cases on record

Cases on record: 11
Classification: B61L15/00 · B60T17/00 · B61H13/02 · G01K7/02 · B60T17/22 · B60T13/66 · B61L25/02 · B61L27/00 · B61K9/04 · B61K9/00 · G01M17/10 · B60L3/00 · B61L23/06 · B61L25/06 · B61L27/20 · B61L25/08 · G01S19/17 · B61L27/04 · H04J11/00 · B61L23/34 · B61L3/12 · H04W4/40 · B61L3/00 · B61L23/00 · B61L23/04 · B61L29/00 · B61L29/24 · B61L25/00 · B61L19/00 · G06F11/07 · G06F11/14
Courts involved: Fed. Cir. · E.D. Pa. · D. Del. · N.D. Ga. · S.D.N.Y. · W.D. Pa.

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
25-1062	Hum Industrial Technology, Inc. v. Amsted Rail Company, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	15 Oct 2024	163 d	Appeal Dismissed
25-1063	Amsted Rail Company, Inc. v. Hum Industrial Technology, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	15 Oct 2024	647 d	Unpatentable
2:24-cv-02963	Railware, Inc. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority	E.D. Pa.	8 Jul 2024	350 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
1:23-cv-00314	Metrom Rail, LLC v. Ground Transportation Systems USA, Inc.	D. Del.	22 Mar 2023	14 d	Case Transferred
1:22-cv-04431	Rail Assets, LLC v. Norfolk Southern, Corp.	N.D. Ga.	7 Nov 2022	143 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-05013	Railware, Inc. v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation	S.D.N.Y.	15 Jun 2022	730 d	Dismissed without Prejudice
2:19-cv-01636	Rail Assets, LLC v. Wabtec Corporation	W.D. Pa.	17 Dec 2019	951 d	Case Settled
2019-1877	Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation v. Siemens Mobility, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	15 May 2019	140 d	Closed
2019-1752	Siemens Mobility, Inc. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation	Fed. Cir.	10 Apr 2019	517 d	Closed
2019-1732	Siemens Mobility, Inc. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation	Fed. Cir.	4 Apr 2019	523 d	Closed
2019-1653	Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation v. Siemens Mobility, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	18 Mar 2019	198 d	Closed

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Railway Traffic Control. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Railway Traffic Control Patent litigation record

11 cases on record

Where the claim space is crowded