Semiconductor Devices and Lighting Device Components Patent litigation record

Technology 19 cases

19 cases on record in Semiconductor Devices and Lighting Device Components. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

19 cases on record

Cases on record
19
Classification
H01L31/00 · G01J1/04 · G01J5/08 · G02B5/02 · G02B19/00 · H01L31/0232 · H01L31/0525 · H01L31/054 · F21V7/00 · F21V8/00 · G09F13/18 · G02B6/42 · G09F13/04 · H01L33/48 · H01L33/62 · H01L33/54 · H01L23/13 · H10W70/68 · H10W70/40 · H01L33/00 · H01L33/32 · H01L33/24 · H01L33/08 · H01L27/15 · H01L33/20 · H01L33/38 · H01L33/44 · H01L27/32 · H01L33/28 · H01L51/52 · H01L33/06 · F21V5/00 · H01L25/13 · H01L25/075 · H01L25/10 · H05B33/02 · H05B33/08 · H05B44/00 · F21V33/00 · H01L29/88 · H01L29/04 · H01L29/15 · H01L31/036 · H01L33/10 · H10W70/60 · H01L21/00 · H05B33/26 · H01L33/42 · H10P95/00 · F21V7/04 · H01J1/62 · H01L33/64 · H10P14/40 · H01L31/12 · F21V1/00 · F21V9/00 · H01L33/58 · H01L33/50 · G02F1/1335 · F21V5/04 · F21Y101/00 · H01L21/50 · H01L33/56 · H01L29/22 · H10D62/86 · H01L23/498 · F21V29/00 · H05K3/40 · H05K3/00 · H05K3/42 · H05K1/18 · H01L33/60 · H01L23/48 · H01L33/46 · H01L33/14 · F21K99/00
Courts involved
W.D. Tex. · S.D. Fla. · D. Del. · E.D. Tex. · C.D. Cal. · N.D. Cal. · United States International Trade Commission
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
6:25-cv-00026 SVV Technology Innovations, Inc. v. Asustek Computer, Inc. W.D. Tex. 24 Jan 2025 249 d Case Transferred
1:21-cv-00912 Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Ace Hardware Corporation W.D. Tex. 12 Oct 2021 0 d Other
6:21-cv-01060 Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Ace Hardware Corporation W.D. Tex. 12 Oct 2021 185 d Closed
0:20-cv-62302 Signify North America Corporation v. Robe Lighting, Inc. S.D. Fla. 12 Nov 2020 714 d Consent Judgment
1:20-cv-24645 Signify North America Corporation v. Robe Lighting, Inc. S.D. Fla. 12 Nov 2020 0 d Other
1:19-cv-01626 Epistar Corporation v. GMY Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. D. Del. 30 Aug 2019 244 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00805 Lighting Science Group, Corp. v. Acuity Brands, Inc. D. Del. 1 May 2019 602 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00806 Lighting Science Group, Corp. v. General Electric Company D. Del. 1 May 2019 950 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00807 Lighting Science Group, Corp. v. Signify, NV D. Del. 1 May 2019 602 d Voluntary dismissal
1:19-cv-00808 Lighting Science Group, Corp. v. Eaton Corporation, PLC D. Del. 1 May 2019 196 d Voluntary dismissal
2:18-cv-00386 Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Fry's Electronics, Inc. E.D. Tex. 31 Aug 2018 402 d Other
8:18-cv-00799 Epistar Corporation v. V-TAC USA, Corp. C.D. Cal. 7 May 2018 107 d Likely Settlement
2:17-cv-06050 Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Lite-on, Inc. C.D. Cal. 15 Aug 2017 346 d Stayed
2:17-cv-05184 Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. C.D. Cal. 13 Jul 2017 201 d Likely Settlement
2:17-cv-04273 Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd C.D. Cal. 8 Jun 2017 414 d Stayed
8:17-cv-00981 Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. C.D. Cal. 7 Jun 2017 415 d Stayed
2:17-cv-00308 Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. E.D. Tex. 13 Apr 2017 56 d Voluntary dismissal
3:16-cv-04981 Epistar Corporation v. Adamax, Inc. N.D. Cal. 30 Aug 2016 55 d Voluntary dismissal
337-TA-947 Cree, Inc. v. Feit Electric Company, Inc. United States International Trade Commission 18 Feb 2015 707 d Closed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Semiconductor Devices and Lighting Device Components. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.