Speech & Audio Analysis/Synthesis Patent litigation record

Technology 21 cases

21 cases on record in Speech & Audio Analysis/Synthesis. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
Classification
G10L15/00 · G10L15/18 · G10L15/187 · G10L15/34 · G10L21/00 · G10L15/28 · G10L15/01 · G10L15/32 · G10L15/22 · G10L17/22 · G10L15/08 · G06F3/16 · H04N21/422 · H04N21/81 · H04N21/435 · G10L15/02 · H04N5/44 · H04N21/436 · G10L25/00 · G06F17/30 · G10L25/57 · G11B27/036 · G06T7/00 · H04N21/4402 · G10L15/26 · G06K9/00 · H04N9/87 · H04N9/802 · H04N9/80 · G10L15/20 · G10L25/84 · G10L25/78 · G10L21/06 · G01J1/42 · H04M3/493 · G10L13/00 · G10L11/00 · G07F17/30 · G06F17/28 · G06F17/20 · H04M11/04 · H04R27/00 · G06F40/00 · G10L25/60 · G10L15/10 · G10L15/06 · G10L19/02 · H03G3/20 · G10L19/26 · G10L21/038 · H03D1/24 · H04B1/38 · H04K1/10 · G10L19/00 · H04B1/66
Courts involved
E.D. Tex. · Fed. Cir. · W.D. Tex. · E.D. Va. · United States International Trade Commission · N.D. Cal.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:26-cv-00097 CDN Innovations, LLC v. Toyota Motor, Corp. E.D. Tex. 5 Feb 2026 83 d Dismissed without Prejudice
24-2204 Zentian Ltd. v. Apple, Inc. Fed. Cir. 13 Aug 2024 664 d Unpatentable
24-2119 Google, LLC v. Sonos, Inc. Fed. Cir. 22 Jul 2024 687 d Case Remanded
24-2120 Google, LLC v. Sonos, Inc. Fed. Cir. 22 Jul 2024 687 d Reversed and Remanded
24-1916 Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc. Fed. Cir. 6 Jun 2024 686 d Voluntary dismissal
24-1856 Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Roku, Inc. Fed. Cir. 23 May 2024 720 d Unpatentable
6:24-cv-00245 Cellular South, Inc. v. Google, LLC W.D. Tex. 9 May 2024 279 d Case Transferred
24-1426 Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Roku, Inc. Fed. Cir. 2 Feb 2024 798 d Unpatentable
23-2296 Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Google, LLC Fed. Cir. 17 Aug 2023 567 d Unpatentable
23-2297 Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Google, LLC Fed. Cir. 17 Aug 2023 567 d Unpatentable
1:23-cv-00581 Dialect, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. E.D. Va. 1 May 2023 633 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00142 Verna IP Holdings, LLC v. Civicplus, LLC W.D. Tex. 22 Feb 2023 68 d Voluntary dismissal
2:23-cv-00061 Dialect, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. E.D. Tex. 17 Feb 2023 206 d Case Dismissed
23-1447 Synkloud Technologies, LLC v. Nuance Communications Corp. Fed. Cir. 1 Feb 2023 163 d Voluntary dismissal
337-TA-1329 Google, LLC v. Sonos, Inc. United States International Trade Commission 9 Aug 2022 973 d Judgment on the merits for Defendant
337-TA-1330 Google, LLC v. Sonos, Inc. United States International Trade Commission 9 Aug 2022 491 d Judgment on the merits for Defendant
6:22-cv-00122 Zentian, Ltd. v. Apple, Inc. W.D. Tex. 2 Feb 2022 496 d Case Transferred
6:22-cv-00123 Zentian, Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc. W.D. Tex. 2 Feb 2022 1022 d Case Dismissed
6:21-cv-00422 Verna IP Holdings, LLC v. Alert Media, Inc. W.D. Tex. 27 Apr 2021 685 d Consent Judgment
6:20-cv-00493 WSOU Investments, LLC v. ZTE, Corp. W.D. Tex. 3 Jun 2020 994 d Consent Judgment
3:17-cv-05947 Hybrid Audio, LLC v. Asustek Computer, Inc. N.D. Cal. 17 Oct 2017 2726 d Case Settled
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Speech & Audio Analysis/Synthesis. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information — including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing — use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.