Switching & Selecting and Electric Digital Data Processing Patent litigation record

Technology 21 cases

21 cases on record in Switching & Selecting and Electric Digital Data Processing. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
Classification
H04Q3/00 · H04M7/00 · H04L29/06 · H04M3/56 · H04L29/08 · H04Q11/04 · H04M3/42 · H04M3/51 · G06F15/16 · H04L12/66 · H04L12/18 · H04L12/54 · H04L12/58 · H04Q5/22 · H04B5/48 · G06F7/04 · G06F12/00 · G06F21/00 · G06F12/14 · G06F21/32 · G06F21/34 · G06F21/35 · G06F21/44 · G07F7/10 · G06K7/00 · G06K19/07 · H04Q7/20 · H04M1/66 · H04M3/38 · G06F1/16 · G06F3/033 · G06F3/042 · H04B7/26 · H04L12/28 · H04L12/56 · H04W16/14 · H04W72/00 · H04W76/04 · H04W84/18 · H04W84/20 · H04W88/06 · H04W92/02 · G06Q10/10 · G06Q20/10 · G06Q20/40 · G06Q30/06 · G06Q40/00 · H04Q7/32 · H04Q7/38 · H04W4/06 · H04W40/20 · H04W88/02 · G06F9/445 · G06F13/00 · H04W8/22 · H04W4/02 · H04W4/029 · H04W8/08 · H04W8/14 · H04W8/18 · H04W8/20 · G06F17/30 · G06F7/00 · G01C21/00
Courts involved
D. Del. · W.D. Tex. · Fed. Cir. · C.D. Cal. · N.D. Tex. · E.D. Tex. · D. Nev.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:21-cv-01507 Wave Linx, LLC v. Clearone, Inc. D. Del. 26 Oct 2021 42 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00955 Aire Technology Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. W.D. Tex. 15 Sep 2021 363 d Likely Settlement
6:21-cv-00580 Pineapple34, LLC v. Acer, Inc. W.D. Tex. 8 Jun 2021 112 d Voluntary dismissal
6:21-cv-00151 Pineapple34, LLC v. Sony Electronics, Inc. W.D. Tex. 18 Feb 2021 11 d Voluntary dismissal
2020-1049 Uniloc 2017, LLC v. Microsoft, Corp. Fed. Cir. 16 Oct 2019 194 d Closed
2019-1802 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Microsoft, Corp. Fed. Cir. 25 Apr 2019 410 d Closed
8:18-cv-02053 Uniloc 2017, LLC v. Microsoft, Corp. C.D. Cal. 17 Nov 2018 265 d Stayed
3:18-cv-01540 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. N.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2018 35 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-01541 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. HP, Inc. N.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2018 15 d Voluntary dismissal
3:18-cv-01542 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Dell, Inc. N.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2018 259 d Stayed
3:18-cv-01543 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Acer America Corporation N.D. Tex. 14 Jun 2018 259 d Stayed
3:18-cv-00222 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation N.D. Tex. 26 Jan 2018 389 d Judgment on the Merits
2:17-cv-00744 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. E.D. Tex. 13 Nov 2017 357 d MDL Transfer
3:17-cv-03112 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. ZTE, Corp. N.D. Tex. 13 Nov 2017 225 d Voluntary dismissal
1:17-cv-01068 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. HP, Inc. W.D. Tex. 10 Nov 2017 214 d MDL Transfer
1:17-cv-00999 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Dell, Inc. W.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2017 238 d MDL Transfer
3:17-cv-01259 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. N.D. Tex. 10 May 2017 659 d Stayed
3:16-cv-03320 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc. N.D. Tex. 29 Nov 2016 821 d Stayed
3:16-cv-03321 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Acer America Corporation N.D. Tex. 29 Nov 2016 184 d Other
3:16-cv-03322 Iron Oak Technologies, LLC v. Asus Computer International, Inc. N.D. Tex. 29 Nov 2016 821 d Stayed
2:12-cv-01308 Silver State Intellectual Technologies, Inc. v. Foursquare Labs, Inc. D. Nev. 25 Jul 2012 1143 d Likely Settlement
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Switching & Selecting and Electric Digital Data Processing. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.