Wigs & Artificial Flowers Patent litigation record

Technology 24 cases

24 cases on record in Wigs & Artificial Flowers. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

24 cases on record

Cases on record
24
Classification
A41G5/02 · A41G5/00 · A41G3/00 · B65B5/04 · B65D73/00 · C08L77/00 · C08L67/00 · D01F11/08 · D01F1/07 · D01F6/62 · D01F6/92 · D06M15/53
Courts involved
S.D.N.Y. · E.D. Pa. · E.D. Tex. · United States International Trade Commission · Fed. Cir. · W.D. Tex. · D.N.J. · C.D. Cal. · E.D.N.Y. · N.D. Cal. · S.D. Fla. · M.D. Fla.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
1:25-cv-08082 ABC Companies v. DEF, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 30 Sep 2025 273 d Case Settled
2:25-cv-01828 NEXGEL, Inc. v. Kiss Nail Products, Inc. E.D. Pa. 9 Apr 2025 324 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:25-cv-00319 Kiss Nail Products, Inc. v. Velour Cosmetics, Inc. E.D. Tex. 31 Mar 2025 128 d Dismissed without Prejudice
1:25-cv-00403 ABC Companies v. DEF, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 15 Jan 2025 92 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-08925 ABC Companies v. DEF, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 21 Nov 2024 98 d Consent Judgment
337-TA-1415 JBS Hair, Inc. v. A-Hair Import Inc. United States International Trade Commission 3 Aug 2024 422 d Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff
24-1599 Ng LLC v. Createdhair Designs, LLC Fed. Cir. 26 Mar 2024 539 d Appeal Dismissed
6:22-cv-00777 Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Hollyren Cosmetics Co., Ltd W.D. Tex. 12 Jul 2022 1429 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:22-cv-01576 JBS Hair, Inc. v. SLI Production IW, Corp. D.N.J. 21 Mar 2022 960 d Case Stayed
2:20-cv-09776 NG Imports v. Zhengzhou Kerui Electronic Commerce Company, Ltd. C.D. Cal. 23 Oct 2020 276 d Voluntary dismissal
1:20-cv-10023 Lashify, Inc. v. Kiss Nail Products, Inc. D.N.J. 5 Aug 2020 84 d Closed
2:20-cv-00988 One Two Cosmetics, LLC v. American International Industries, Inc. C.D. Cal. 30 Jan 2020 581 d Voluntary dismissal
2019-1771 International Designs Corp., LLC v. Hair Art Int'l, Inc. Fed. Cir. 15 Apr 2019 39 d Closed
2:19-cv-00536 Kiss Nail Products, Inc. v. One Two Cosmetics, LLC E.D.N.Y. 28 Jan 2019 403 d Case Transferred
4:18-cv-06595 Kaneka Corporation v. UNO & Company, Ltd. N.D. Cal. 29 Oct 2018 133 d Voluntary dismissal
0:18-cv-60032 International Designs Corporation, LLC v. Quingdao Seaforest Hair Products Co., Ltd. S.D. Fla. 5 Jan 2018 33 d Case Dismissed
2:17-cv-08411 International Designs Corporation, LLC v. Hair Art Int'l, Inc. C.D. Cal. 17 Nov 2017 480 d Judgment on the Merits
0:17-cv-60431 International Designs Corporation, LLC v. Qingdao SeaForest Hair Products, Co., Ltd. S.D. Fla. 28 Feb 2017 360 d Procedural Outcome
8:16-cv-01606 Simnic Ventures, LLC v. Global Grind, LLC M.D. Fla. 17 Jun 2016 95 d Out-of-court Settlement
6:15-cv-01961 Simnic Ventures, LLC v. Glam Seamless, LLC M.D. Fla. 18 Nov 2015 5 d Case Transferred
8:15-cv-02723 Simnic Ventures, LLC v. Glam Seamless, LLC M.D. Fla. 18 Nov 2015 399 d Likely Settlement
6:15-cv-01627 Simnic Ventures, LLC v. Donna Bella Milan Incorporated M.D. Fla. 30 Sep 2015 121 d Case Transferred
8:16-cv-00229 Simnic Ventures, LLC v. Donna Bella Milan Incorporated M.D. Fla. 30 Sep 2015 202 d Likely Settlement
2014-1172 Kaneka Corporation v. JBS Hair, Inc. Fed. Cir. 23 Dec 2013 836 d Closed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Wigs & Artificial Flowers. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.