Techshell, Inc. v. Max Interactive, Inc.

8:19-cv-00608 C.D. Cal. Closed 5 patents
Get a prior-art report

Infringement action filed 1 Apr 2019 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and closed 2 Jan 2020, with 5 patents asserted. Recorded basis of termination: likely settlement.

Case recordPatsnap Litigation Data·

Case record

Case no.
8:19-cv-00608
Verdict cause
Infringement action
Court
C.D. Cal.
Court level
District Court
Case region
California
Judge
Andrew J. Guilford
Trial level
First instance
Filed – Closed
1 Apr 2019 – 2 Jan 2020
Duration
276 days
Basis of termination
Likely Settlement
Products & marks
Extreme Shell for 13 MacBook Air, Extreme Shell for Acer C731 Chromebook 11 and similar others - Max Extreme Shells
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Case 8:19-cv-00608, United States District Court for the Central District of California. Open this record in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Check this patent against your own product

Prior art, claim scope, infringement exposure and design-around routes. Every answer cites the records behind it.

Get an FTO claim chart
10,000 free credits to start
Patent at issue
US7643274B2 Active App. US11/788329

Protective cover for laptop computer

An exterior cover for a laptop computer having a display portion and a keyboard portion is disclosed. The exterior cover includes a first rigid planar element for placement on an outside surface of the display portion. The first rigid planar element includes a raised edge along a perimeter of the first rigid planar element, wherein the raised edge extends toward the display portion. The first rigid planar element further includes a plurality of tabs located on the raised edge, wherein each tab extends from the raised edge for gripping the display portion. The exterior cover further includes a second rigid planar element for placement on an outside surface of the keyboard portion. The second rigid planar element includes a raised edge extending toward the keyboard portion. The second rigid planar element further includes a plurality of tabs for gripping the keyboard portion.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
5 Jan 2010
Earliest priority
21 Apr 2006
Est. expiry
6 Dec 2027
Validity challenges
2 on record95001766 · IPRex · filed by Jigang Jin96029999 · SE
Licences recorded
None recorded
Inventors
BEKELE, HAILE
Classification
G06F1/16
US7643274B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1 · US7643274B2, from the published patent document
US7643274B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2 · US7643274B2, from the published patent document
US7907400B2 Active App. US12/544906

Protective cover for laptop computer

An exterior cover for a laptop computer having a display portion and a keyboard portion is disclosed. The exterior cover includes a first rigid planar element for placement on an outside surface of the display portion. The first rigid planar element includes a raised edge along a perimeter of the first rigid planar element, wherein the raised edge extends toward the display portion. The first rigid planar element further includes a plurality of tabs located on the raised edge, wherein each tab extends from the raised edge for gripping the display portion. The exterior cover further includes a second rigid planar element for placement on an outside surface of the keyboard portion. The second rigid planar element includes a raised edge extending toward the keyboard portion. The second rigid planar element further includes a plurality of tabs for gripping the keyboard portion.

Read claims and description in Eureka
Patent standing
Legal status
Active
Granted
15 Mar 2011
Earliest priority
21 Apr 2006
Est. expiry
19 Apr 2027
Validity challenges
1 on record95001767 · IPRex
Licences recorded
None recorded
Inventors
BEKELE, HAILE
Classification
G06F1/16
US7907400B2 patent drawing, figure 1
Fig. 1 · US7907400B2, from the published patent document
US7907400B2 patent drawing, figure 2
Fig. 2 · US7907400B2, from the published patent document

Also asserted in this case

3 more

The docket lists 5 asserted patents. Full bibliographic detail, drawings and prosecution history for the remaining 3 asserted patents are one query away in Eureka.

Source: Patsnap patent data + case record. Bibliographic fields and drawings reproduced from the published patent document. Break down the claims
Parties & counsel

Parties of record

Counsel of record

Source: case record + Patsnap company data. Attorney names appear as recorded in the docket. Compare both portfolios
Outcome

Basis of termination

From the record · verbatim

Case 8:19-cv-00608 · C.D. Cal. · closed 2 January 2020
Source: case record, verbatim. The quoted paragraph is the basis-of-termination text as filed.

Related cases

Three questions this record usually leads to. Each one runs against the full litigation and patent corpus, and cites what it finds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is case 8:19-cv-00608?

8:19-cv-00608 is a patent infringement action brought by Techshell, Inc. against Max Interactive, Inc., filed on 1 Apr 2019 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The case closed on 2 January 2020.

Which patents were asserted in 8:19-cv-00608?

US7643274B2 (“Protective cover for laptop computer”), assigned to TECHSHELL, INC., currently active; US7907400B2 (“Protective cover for laptop computer”), assigned to TECHSHELL, INC., currently active; US8638555B2 (“Protective cover for laptop computer”), assigned to TECHSHELL, INC.; US8289703B2 (“Protective cover for laptop computer”), assigned to TECHSHELL, INC.; US10234898B2 (“Protective cover for laptop computers”), assigned to TECHSHELL, INC.. The record also lists Extreme Shell for 13 MacBook Air, Extreme Shell for Acer C731 Chromebook 11 and similar others - Max Extreme Shells.

How long did case 8:19-cv-00608 take?

276 calendar days, from filing on 1 Apr 2019 to closure on 2 January 2020.

Who were the attorneys and the judge in 8:19-cv-00608?

Judge Andrew J. Guilford presided. Dipu A Doshi is recorded as counsel for plaintiff Techshell. Christopher J. Capelli appears for defendant Max Interactive.

Answers reproduce fields from the case record for 8:19-cv-00608 and do not constitute legal advice. Ask your own question
Next step

Go further with this record

Read how the method works, run it on your own product, then size the next step.

  • 01 / How-toUsing patent search for competitive intelligenceRead a rival's filings to see where its products are going.GuideRead
  • 02 / AI agentFTO ReportCheck whether your own product could read on these claims.Patsnap EurekaRun it
  • 03 / Free toolAI prior art searchDescribe an idea, get the closest patents.AI resultTry tool

More next stepsHow to run a freedom-to-operate analysis

General information only. This page reproduces publicly available court docket data for case 8:19-cv-00608 and is provided for general information and reference only. It is not legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. It does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Patent figures. Any patent drawings shown are reproduced from the identified patent publications to illustrate the cited documents, and do not establish the scope, validity or enforceability of any patent.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.