https://eureka.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/code-excited-linear-prediction-speech-coding-algorithm-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Media, Audio & Immersive Interfaces

Code Excited Linear Prediction Speech Coding Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims

A data-driven look at Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) speech coding patents: 3,081 records, leading assignees, IPC composition and filing trends through 2026.

3,081
Published Records
31%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-27%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (15 records) → 2024 (11); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 3,081 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This landscape covers 3,081 published patent families matching Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) speech and voice coding, spanning filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. CELP is a linear-predictive speech coding architecture widely used in voice codecs, and the search captures records combining CELP or related coding/codec/encoding terms with speech or voice signal processing. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate actual filing activity.

The scope spans core codec design (dominated by the G10L IPC subclass), coding and code-conversion techniques (H03M), and integration with transmission and telephony systems (H04B, H04L, H04M, H04Q). Filing activity is concentrated among a set of large telecom and electronics assignees, alongside a long tail of smaller filers, across receiving offices led by the United States, the EPO and South Korea.

CELP speech coding: records, assignees and technology composition
  1. 1QUALCOMM INC260
  2. 2PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP228
  3. 3FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV174
  4. 4SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD142
  5. 5TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)138
  6. 6ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST135
  7. 7HUAWEI TECH CO LTD127
  8. 8III HOLDINGS 12 LLC109
  9. 9SONY GROUP CORP105
  10. 10AT&T CORP93
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Code Excited Linear Prediction Speech Coding Algorithm Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data & Trends

Filing trends and technology composition

The filing trend and IPC composition below are drawn from the 3,081 records in scope for this search, spanning 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off.

Filing activity peaked in 2007 and has since settled into a lower, steadier band

Annual filings peaked at 190 in 2007 and declined over the following years; between 2021 (15) and 2024 (the most recent complete year) filings fell to 11, a -27% change. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as a further drop.

Filing activity peaked in 2007 and has since settled into a lower, steadier band05010015020019020072009201120132015201720192021202320252Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

G10L dominates; coding and transmission classes trail well behind

G10L (speech and audio analysis/synthesis) appears in 88.3% of the 3,081 records in scope, far ahead of H03M coding/code-conversion at 24.3% and the transmission-related classes H04B (11.1%) and H04L (7.4%). Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100%.

G10L dominates; coding and transmission classes trail well behindG10L · Speech & audio analysis/synthe…2,71988.3%H03M · Coding & code conversion75024.3%H04B · Transmission (general)34111.1%H04L · Digital information transmissi…2287.4%H04M · Telephonic communication1043.4%H04Q · Switching & selecting933.0%G01L · Force & pressure measurement872.8%H04J · Multiplex communication832.7%Other3039.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 3,081 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Code Excited Linear Prediction Speech Coding Algorithm Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Code Excited Linear Prediction Speech Coding Algorithm Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about code excited linear prediction speech coding algorithm patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative claim in the core CELP codec space

Representative Patent
US8527265B22013-09-03

Low-complexity encoding/decoding of quantized MDCT spectrum in scalable speech and audio codecs

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED

A scalable speech and audio codec is provided that implements combinatorial spectrum encoding. A residual signal is obtained from a Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP)-based encoding layer, where the residual signal is a difference between an original audio signal and a reconstructed version of the original audio signal. The residual signal is transformed at a Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT)-type transform layer to obtain a corresponding transform spectrum having a plurality of spectral lines. The transform spectrum spectral lines are transformed using a combinatorial position coding technique.Granted to Qualcomm Incorporated, 2013-09-03. Illustrates the standard pattern in this field: a CELP encoding layer paired with a downstream transform-domain coding stage.

US8527265B2 — patent drawing 1US8527265B2 — patent drawing 2
View full patent record
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Code Excited Linear Prediction Speech Coding Algorithm Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing and freedom-to-operate decisions

These figures come directly from the 3,081 records in scope for this search and the accompanying assignee ranking.

Concentration
30.6%
of 3,081 records held by the top 5 assignees

The core claim space is concentrated but not closed

The leading assignee holds 260 records on its own, and the top five combined hold 942 records — 30.6% of the 3,081 records in scope. The top ten reach 49.0%, meaning roughly half of all filings sit outside the ten largest holders, leaving room for new entrants in narrower technical combinations.

Based on the 100-company assignee ranking behind this search.
Technology mix
88.3%
of records carry G10L (speech & audio synthesis)

Claims cluster tightly around the codec core

G10L appears in 88.3% of the 3,081 records, far ahead of H03M coding/conversion at 24.3% and the transmission classes H04B and H04L at 11.1% and 7.4% respectively. Filing dense in G10L means the core signal-processing claim space is heavily occupied; differentiation tends to come from combining CELP with a secondary technique.

Shares sum to more than 100% because records can carry multiple IPC classes.
Filing trend
-27%
change in filings, 2021 to 2024

A mature technology, not a growing one

Annual filings peaked at 190 in 2007 and have since settled into a lower band, falling from 15 in 2021 to 11 in 2024. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the very latest years in the raw trend will always look lower than they eventually turn out to be, but the 2021-2024 comparison is on complete data.

2025 and 2026 figures are not yet complete and are excluded from this comparison.
Jurisdictions
723
US filings, the largest single receiving office

Filing follows the major codec markets

The United States leads receiving offices with 723 filings, ahead of the EPO at 595, South Korea at 231, Japan at 187, WIPO's PCT route at 166, and Canada at 162. That spread tracks the countries with the largest telecom equipment and handset manufacturing and sales bases.

Counts are by receiving office, not by inventor or applicant country.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to code excited linear prediction speech coding algorithm patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Derived observations on the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Code Excited Linear Prediction Speech Coding Algorithm Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis next

The figures above establish the shape of the field. The next step is testing a specific filing or freedom-to-operate question against the underlying records.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leading holders

With the top ten assignees holding 49.0% of all 3,081 records, clearing a new CELP-based design usually starts with the largest portfolios rather than the long tail.

Run an FTO check in Eureka

Find the under-claimed technical branches

Classes like G01L, H04J and H04Q sit well below G10L's 88.3% share, suggesting narrower integration claims may face less crowded prior art.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track whether filing activity is genuinely settling

The -27% change from 2021 to 2024 is measured on complete data; watch how 2025-2026 fill in over the next reporting cycles before concluding the field is shrinking further.

Set up trend monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Code Excited Linear Prediction Speech Coding Algorithm Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Code Excited Linear Prediction Speech Coding Algorithm Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Code Excited Linear Prediction Speech Coding Algorithm Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole code excited linear prediction speech coding algorithm patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.