Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-driven look at Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) speech coding patents: 3,081 records, leading assignees, IPC composition and filing trends through 2026.
Filing growth = 2021 (15 records) → 2024 (11); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 3,081 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
This landscape covers 3,081 published patent families matching Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) speech and voice coding, spanning filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. CELP is a linear-predictive speech coding architecture widely used in voice codecs, and the search captures records combining CELP or related coding/codec/encoding terms with speech or voice signal processing. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate actual filing activity.
The scope spans core codec design (dominated by the G10L IPC subclass), coding and code-conversion techniques (H03M), and integration with transmission and telephony systems (H04B, H04L, H04M, H04Q). Filing activity is concentrated among a set of large telecom and electronics assignees, alongside a long tail of smaller filers, across receiving offices led by the United States, the EPO and South Korea.
The filing trend and IPC composition below are drawn from the 3,081 records in scope for this search, spanning 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off.
Annual filings peaked at 190 in 2007 and declined over the following years; between 2021 (15) and 2024 (the most recent complete year) filings fell to 11, a -27% change. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as a further drop.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
G10L (speech and audio analysis/synthesis) appears in 88.3% of the 3,081 records in scope, far ahead of H03M coding/code-conversion at 24.3% and the transmission-related classes H04B (11.1%) and H04L (7.4%). Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 3,081 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about code excited linear prediction speech coding algorithm patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA scalable speech and audio codec is provided that implements combinatorial spectrum encoding. A residual signal is obtained from a Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP)-based encoding layer, where the residual signal is a difference between an original audio signal and a reconstructed version of the original audio signal. The residual signal is transformed at a Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT)-type transform layer to obtain a corresponding transform spectrum having a plurality of spectral lines. The transform spectrum spectral lines are transformed using a combinatorial position coding technique.Granted to Qualcomm Incorporated, 2013-09-03. Illustrates the standard pattern in this field: a CELP encoding layer paired with a downstream transform-domain coding stage.


When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →These figures come directly from the 3,081 records in scope for this search and the accompanying assignee ranking.
The leading assignee holds 260 records on its own, and the top five combined hold 942 records — 30.6% of the 3,081 records in scope. The top ten reach 49.0%, meaning roughly half of all filings sit outside the ten largest holders, leaving room for new entrants in narrower technical combinations.
G10L appears in 88.3% of the 3,081 records, far ahead of H03M coding/conversion at 24.3% and the transmission classes H04B and H04L at 11.1% and 7.4% respectively. Filing dense in G10L means the core signal-processing claim space is heavily occupied; differentiation tends to come from combining CELP with a secondary technique.
Annual filings peaked at 190 in 2007 and have since settled into a lower band, falling from 15 in 2021 to 11 in 2024. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the very latest years in the raw trend will always look lower than they eventually turn out to be, but the 2021-2024 comparison is on complete data.
The United States leads receiving offices with 723 filings, ahead of the EPO at 595, South Korea at 231, Japan at 187, WIPO's PCT route at 166, and Canada at 162. That spread tracks the countries with the largest telecom equipment and handset manufacturing and sales bases.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to code excited linear prediction speech coding algorithm patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The figures above establish the shape of the field. The next step is testing a specific filing or freedom-to-operate question against the underlying records.
With the top ten assignees holding 49.0% of all 3,081 records, clearing a new CELP-based design usually starts with the largest portfolios rather than the long tail.
Run an FTO check in EurekaClasses like G01L, H04J and H04Q sit well below G10L's 88.3% share, suggesting narrower integration claims may face less crowded prior art.
Explore white space in EurekaThe -27% change from 2021 to 2024 is measured on complete data; watch how 2025-2026 fill in over the next reporting cycles before concluding the field is shrinking further.
Set up trend monitoring in EurekaCELP is a speech-coding architecture that models the vocal tract with linear prediction and encodes the residual using a codebook search, and it underpins a large share of voice codecs used in mobile and VoIP systems. In this dataset, 88.3% of the 3,081 records in scope carry the G10L IPC subclass for speech and audio analysis and synthesis, showing that most patenting activity in this search treats CELP as a core signal-processing technique rather than a peripheral feature. Filings typically combine a CELP encoding layer with a secondary technique, such as transform coding or entropy coding of the residual, as seen in the representative patent US8527265B2.
The assignee ranking behind this search covers 100 companies, with the leading assignee holding 260 of the 3,081 records in scope. The top five combined hold 942 records, 30.6% of all records, and the top ten combined reach 1,511 records, 49.0% of the total, indicating a field where a relatively small number of large telecom and electronics companies hold a substantial, though not overwhelming, share of the filings. The remainder is spread across a long tail of smaller filers, which is typical for a mature signal-processing standard technology.
Filing activity peaked in 2007 at 190 records and has trended lower since. Looking at the most recent period that can be treated as complete, filings fell from 15 in 2021 to 11 in 2024, a -27% change over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in the raw data are still incomplete and should not be read as evidence of a further, sharper decline.
US8527265B2, assigned to Qualcomm and granted in 2013, covers a specific pipeline: extracting a residual signal from a CELP encoding layer, transforming that residual with a DCT-type transform, and encoding the resulting spectral line positions using a combinatorial lexicographical-index technique. It does not block CELP encoding generally, nor does it block other residual-coding methods such as scalar quantization; its scope is tied specifically to the combinatorial position-coding step applied to a CELP-derived transform spectrum. Teams should check this patent specifically when implementing combinatorial indexing of residual spectral lines, rather than assuming it covers the broader CELP-plus-transform combination.
Among receiving offices in this dataset, the United States leads with 723 filings, followed by the European Patent Office at 595, South Korea at 231, Japan at 187, the WIPO PCT route at 166, and Canada at 162. This spread reflects the global commercial footprint of voice codec standards, where filers typically seek protection across the major telecom equipment and handset markets rather than concentrating in a single jurisdiction.
Go past this page: query the whole code excited linear prediction speech coding algorithm patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page