Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-backed look at Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding (CABAC) patents: filing trends from 2007 to 2026, the concentration of ownership among leading video-codec filers, and where technology composition data sho
Filing growth = 2021 (207 records) → 2024 (245); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 5,413 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
Context adaptive binary arithmetic coding, CABAC, is the entropy-coding stage used inside modern video encoders and decoders to compress symbol data by adapting probability estimates to context. This landscape covers 5,413 published records filed between 2007 and 2026 that combine CABAC-specific terminology with video, encoding, or decoder claim language. Publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent filing years in this dataset are understated and will continue to fill in.
The records span the H.264/AVC filing buildout, the 2012 peak tied to that standard's rollout, and the later HEVC and VVC-era filings that followed. Ownership is concentrated among a small number of large video-codec contributors, while the technology composition data shows claim density sitting almost entirely inside video-coding-specific classifications, with several adjacent branches only lightly claimed.
The record set spans 2007 to 2026, covering both the H.264/AVC-era buildout and the later HEVC and VVC filing waves, with entropy-coding claims concentrated in a small number of IPC subclasses.
Filings ran from 149 in 2007 to a peak of 896 in 2012, the period when H.264/AVC CABAC implementations were being widely claimed. Activity has continued since: 2021 to 2024, the last full year in this data, shows filings rising from 207 to 245, an 18% increase. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the recent-year numbers will keep filling in rather than signalling a slowdown.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
H04N, pictorial communication for video and TV, appears in 91.8% of the 5,413 records in scope, confirming that CABAC claims are overwhelmingly framed as video-decoder methods. H03M, general coding and code conversion, follows at 14.3%, the layer where context-modelling and binarization techniques are claimed independent of a specific video standard. Every other subclass — image processing, digital transmission, general data processing, AI-based computing among them — sits under 5%, each a narrower and less contested branch of the same field.
Shares are the percentage of the 5,413 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about context adaptive binary arithmetic coding patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA reduction in the number of binarizations and/or contexts used in context adaptive binary arithmetic coding (CABAC) for video coding is proposed. The disclosure describes techniques that may lower the number of contexts used in CABAC by up to 56, including encoding a partition-type bin of a prediction-type syntax element using a single context regardless of partition type, in contrast to schemes that vary the context by partition type.Filed by Velos Media International Limited, published as SG11201401687XA.


When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four figures from this dataset matter more than the raw record count for deciding where to file and who to watch.
Five assignees hold 46.1% of all records in scope, rising to 59.3% across ten. Any new filing in the core CABAC context-modelling space will sit close to claims from the same small group of filers.
Filings grew from 207 in 2021 to 245 in 2024 — the last year with a complete publication record. 2012's peak of 896 was standard-cycle driven; this later rise looks more like sustained incremental claiming.
H04N, pictorial communication, appears in 91.8% of the 5,413 records. H03M, general coding, follows at 14.3%. Every other subclass sits under 5%, marking the outer, less-contested edge of the field.
The United States leads with 1,455 records, ahead of the EPO at 625 and the WIPO/PCT route at 419. India, China and South Korea round out the six offices tracked, showing where enforcement and licensing exposure concentrates.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to context adaptive binary arithmetic coding patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The figures above show where CABAC claim density sits and who holds it. The next step is checking a specific design, filing plan, or design-around against the underlying claim language.
With five assignees holding 46.1% of the 5,413 records in scope, a freedom-to-operate review should start with their specific claim scope rather than the field broadly.
Search assignee portfolios in EurekaAI-model-based context selection and general transmission-conditioned approaches sit well under 5% of records each, leaving room for narrowly drafted claims outside the dense video-coding core.
Explore white space in EurekaFilings rose 18% from 2021 to 2024, the last complete year, meaning new context-modelling and binarization claims are still being filed and published.
Monitor new filings in EurekaCABAC is an entropy-coding method used in video compression standards to represent encoded video data more efficiently by adapting probability estimates to the local context of each symbol. In patent filings it appears almost exclusively as part of a video encoder or decoder claim, which is why 91.8% of the 5,413 records in this dataset carry an H04N pictorial-communication classification. Claims typically cover specific ways of deriving, reducing, or updating the contexts and probability states used during binarization, rather than the arithmetic coding engine itself.
Filing activity is concentrated: the five leading assignees together account for 46.1% of the 5,413 records in scope, and the ten leading assignees account for 59.3%. The single leader alone holds 1,493 records, well ahead of the rest of the ranked field. This pattern is typical of standards-essential technology areas, where a handful of large video-codec contributors file heavily across incremental variations to build licensing and cross-licensing positions.
Filings peaked at 896 in 2012, during the H.264/AVC and early HEVC period, and have not returned to that level since. However, the trend has not gone flat: from 2021 to 2024, the last year with a complete publication record, filings rose from 207 to 245, an 18% increase. Figures for 2025 and 2026 look lower only because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so those years are still filling in rather than showing an actual decline.
The United States receives the largest share of filings among the offices tracked, at 1,455 records, followed by the European Patent Office at 625 and the WIPO/PCT route at 419. India, China and South Korea follow at 314, 263 and 198 respectively. This spread reflects both major consumer-electronics manufacturing markets and jurisdictions used for international filing strategy via PCT before national entry.
The densest claiming sits inside H04N (video coding, 91.8% of records) and H03M (coding and code conversion, 14.3%), so most defensible new claim space sits outside those cores. Subclasses tied to AI-based computing (G06N, 0.5% of records) and general transmission (H04B, 0.9%) are lightly claimed relative to the field, suggesting model-driven or channel-conditioned approaches to context selection are less contested than classical fixed-context schemes. That said, low density does not guarantee freedom to operate — it means fewer filings to check, not zero.
Go past this page: query the whole context adaptive binary arithmetic coding patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page