https://eureka.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/context-adaptive-binary-arithmetic-coding-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Video Coding

Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding Patents: Who Holds the Ground

A data-backed look at Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding (CABAC) patents: filing trends from 2007 to 2026, the concentration of ownership among leading video-codec filers, and where technology composition data sho

5,413
Published Records
46%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+18%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (207 records) → 2024 (245); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 5,413 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Context adaptive binary arithmetic coding, CABAC, is the entropy-coding stage used inside modern video encoders and decoders to compress symbol data by adapting probability estimates to context. This landscape covers 5,413 published records filed between 2007 and 2026 that combine CABAC-specific terminology with video, encoding, or decoder claim language. Publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent filing years in this dataset are understated and will continue to fill in.

The records span the H.264/AVC filing buildout, the 2012 peak tied to that standard's rollout, and the later HEVC and VVC-era filings that followed. Ownership is concentrated among a small number of large video-codec contributors, while the technology composition data shows claim density sitting almost entirely inside video-coding-specific classifications, with several adjacent branches only lightly claimed.

CABAC filing activity, 2007-2026
  1. 1QUALCOMM INC1,493
  2. 2SONY GROUP CORP295
  3. 3HUAWEI TECH CO LTD292
  4. 4SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD213
  5. 5CANON KK201
  6. 6HFI INNOVATION INC173
  7. 7FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV164
  8. 8VELOS MEDIA INT LTD153
  9. 9GE VIDEO COMPRESSION LLC116
  10. 10INTERDIGITAL VC HOLDINGS INC112
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing data

Filing trends and technology composition

The record set spans 2007 to 2026, covering both the H.264/AVC-era buildout and the later HEVC and VVC filing waves, with entropy-coding claims concentrated in a small number of IPC subclasses.

A field that grew fast, peaked, then kept filing steadily

Filings ran from 149 in 2007 to a peak of 896 in 2012, the period when H.264/AVC CABAC implementations were being widely claimed. Activity has continued since: 2021 to 2024, the last full year in this data, shows filings rising from 207 to 245, an 18% increase. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the recent-year numbers will keep filling in rather than signalling a slowdown.

A field that grew fast, peaked, then kept filing steadily02505007501,000149200720092011896201320152017201920212023202532Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Video coding carries the claim density; adjacent branches stay thin

H04N, pictorial communication for video and TV, appears in 91.8% of the 5,413 records in scope, confirming that CABAC claims are overwhelmingly framed as video-decoder methods. H03M, general coding and code conversion, follows at 14.3%, the layer where context-modelling and binarization techniques are claimed independent of a specific video standard. Every other subclass — image processing, digital transmission, general data processing, AI-based computing among them — sits under 5%, each a narrower and less contested branch of the same field.

Video coding carries the claim density; adjacent branches stay thinH04N · Pictorial communication (video…4,96891.8%H03M · Coding & code conversion77314.3%G06T · Image data processing & genera…2164.0%H04L · Digital information transmissi…1362.5%G06F · Electric digital data processi…711.3%G06K · Data recognition & presentation581.1%H04B · Transmission (general)510.9%G06N · Computing based on AI models250.5%Other641.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 5,413 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about context adaptive binary arithmetic coding patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative CABAC patent

Representative record
SG11201401687XA2014-06-27

Number of contexts reduction for context adaptive binary arithmetic coding

VELOS MEDIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

A reduction in the number of binarizations and/or contexts used in context adaptive binary arithmetic coding (CABAC) for video coding is proposed. The disclosure describes techniques that may lower the number of contexts used in CABAC by up to 56, including encoding a partition-type bin of a prediction-type syntax element using a single context regardless of partition type, in contrast to schemes that vary the context by partition type.Filed by Velos Media International Limited, published as SG11201401687XA.

SG11201401687XA — patent drawing 1SG11201401687XA — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing data signals

Four figures from this dataset matter more than the raw record count for deciding where to file and who to watch.

Concentration
46.1%
of 5,413 records held by top 5

The field is not fragmented

Five assignees hold 46.1% of all records in scope, rising to 59.3% across ten. Any new filing in the core CABAC context-modelling space will sit close to claims from the same small group of filers.

Top 10 = 59.3% of 5,413 records
Growth
+18%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

Activity is rising, not cooling

Filings grew from 207 in 2021 to 245 in 2024 — the last year with a complete publication record. 2012's peak of 896 was standard-cycle driven; this later rise looks more like sustained incremental claiming.

Peak year: 2012 at 896 filings
Technology mix
91.8%
of records classified under H04N

Video coding absorbs nearly all claim density

H04N, pictorial communication, appears in 91.8% of the 5,413 records. H03M, general coding, follows at 14.3%. Every other subclass sits under 5%, marking the outer, less-contested edge of the field.

H03M share: 14.3% of records
Jurisdiction
1,455
records at the US receiving office

Filing strategy centres on the US and EPO

The United States leads with 1,455 records, ahead of the EPO at 625 and the WIPO/PCT route at 419. India, China and South Korea round out the six offices tracked, showing where enforcement and licensing exposure concentrates.

EPO: 625 · PCT: 419 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to context adaptive binary arithmetic coding patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Derived observations on the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next steps

Where to take this analysis

The figures above show where CABAC claim density sits and who holds it. The next step is checking a specific design, filing plan, or design-around against the underlying claim language.

Check freedom to operate against the leading holders

With five assignees holding 46.1% of the 5,413 records in scope, a freedom-to-operate review should start with their specific claim scope rather than the field broadly.

Search assignee portfolios in Eureka

Explore the underclaimed branches

AI-model-based context selection and general transmission-conditioned approaches sit well under 5% of records each, leaving room for narrowly drafted claims outside the dense video-coding core.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the current filing wave

Filings rose 18% from 2021 to 2024, the last complete year, meaning new context-modelling and binarization claims are still being filed and published.

Monitor new filings in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about CABAC patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole context adaptive binary arithmetic coding patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.