Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (25 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 137 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Edge stream processing sits at the intersection of network transmission, resource-constrained computing, and on-device inference. The search scope here pairs edge-computing and in-network aggregation concepts with practical constraints — intermittent connectivity, device resource limits, model updates, and clock synchronization — to isolate filings that treat the edge as a live data-processing environment rather than a passive endpoint. The dataset spans 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off and totals 137 published records, each mapped to its patent family so continuation filings do not inflate the count.
The picture that emerges is concentrated rather than fragmented: a small number of filers built out broad portfolios early, and the pace of new filings has slowed sharply from its 2020 peak. That combination — high concentration plus a cooling curve — matters for anyone deciding whether to file, license, or design around existing claims in this space.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 137-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which technology classes carry the claims.
Filings were negligible before 2017, climbed to a peak of 30 records in 2020, then declined — 25 records in 2021 down to 5 in 2024, an 80% drop across that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures (including 14 so far in 2026) will revise upward as publication catches up with filing, typically by around 18 months.
H04L (digital information transmission) appears in 62.0% of the 137 records, well ahead of H04W (wireless networks, 31.4%) and G06N (AI-based computing, 24.8%). Smaller shares in G06Q, G06V and G16H (each 3.6%) mark where edge stream processing touches commerce, vision and healthcare applications without yet forming a dense claim cluster. Because records carry multiple classes, these shares sum above 100% and should be read against the 137-record total, not against each other.
Shares are the percentage of the 137 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about edge stream processing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe apparatus of an edge computing node, a system, a method and a machine-readable medium. The apparatus includes a processor to perform rounds of federated machine learning training, including processing client reports, selecting a candidate set of clients for an epoch, causing a global model to be sent to that candidate set, and performing the federated training on the selected clients using coded training data from each participant.Assigned to Intel Corporation, published 2026-03-31.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20210144517A1 | Multi-entity resource, security, and service management in edge computing deployments | 840 |
| 2 | US20220014963A1 | Reinforcement learning for multi-access traffic management | 335 |
| 3 | US20230156826A1 | Edge computing in satellite connectivity environments | 165 |
| 4 | US20240323657A1 | Misbehavior detection using data consistency checks for collective perception messages | 110 |
| 5 | US20230068386A1 | Systems and methods for distributed learning for wireless edge dynamics | 106 |
| 6 | WO2020226979A2 | Multi-entity resource, security, and service management in edge computing deployments | 101 |
| 7 | WO2021158313A1 | Systems and methods for distributed learning for wireless edge dynamics | 90 |
| 8 | US20230177349A1 | Federated learning optimizations | 80 |
| 9 | US20220345417A1 | Technologies for configuring and reducing resource consumption in time-aware networks and time-sensitive appl… | 72 |
| 10 | US20220191648A1 | Digital twin framework for next generation networks | 72 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before filing or licensing in this space.
The top five assignees combined account for 109 of the 137 records in scope, with the leader alone holding 85. A field this concentrated leaves little room to file broad claims on the core architecture without running into prior art from one or two portfolios.
Annual filings fell from 25 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, after peaking at 30 in 2020. That does not mean the technology is exhausted — it more often signals that the dominant players have shifted from broad architectural claims to narrower follow-on filings, or that publication lag is still masking recent activity.
H04L (digital information transmission) touches nearly two-thirds of records, but G06N (AI-based computing) already appears in a quarter of the corpus — a sign that model-update and local-inference claims are being layered onto established transmission architectures rather than filed as standalone inventions.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to edge stream processing, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| SMITH NED M | GUIM BERNAT FRANCESC | 8 |
| SMITH NED M | DOSHI KSHITIJ ARUN | 8 |
| GUIM BERNAT FRANCESC | DOSHI KSHITIJ ARUN | 8 |
| DETECON AL SAUDIA CO LTD | WASS FELIX THOMAS | 6 |
| ZHANG YI | SRIKANTESWARA SRIKATHYAYANI | 6 |
| Intel Corporation | ZHANG YI | 4 |
| Intel Corporation | VERRALL TIMOTHY | 4 |
| Intel Corporation | SRIKANTESWARA SRIKATHYAYANI | 4 |
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the data, with three pairs tied at 8 shared filings each — a signal of stable internal co-invention teams rather than cross-company joint ventures.
The assignee ranking covers 92 companies counted by records — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the complete set the data returns. It confirms the concentration seen above, while receiving-office data shows where filers actually sought protection.
The leading assignee holds 85 of the 137 records in scope — well ahead of fifth place, which sits at 4. That gap defines the field: one portfolio, then a steep drop to a mid-tier cluster.
Ranks five through ten sit close together at 4 records apiece, together with the leader making up 94.2% of all records. Below that, filers thin out quickly into single- and double-digit contributors.
The United States receives the largest share of filings (54), followed by India (26) and the EPO (22), with WIPO/PCT filings (13) indicating some filers are pursuing multi-jurisdiction coverage rather than staying domestic.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| SMITH NED M | 0 | — |
| DETECON AL SAUDIA CO LTD | 0 | — |
| GUIM BERNAT FRANCESC | 0 | — |
| DOSHI KSHITIJ ARUN | 0 | — |
| ZHANG YI | 0 | — |
| WASS FELIX THOMAS | 0 | — |
| SRIKANTESWARA SRIKATHYAYANI | 0 | — |
The landscape data points to three practical next steps for teams evaluating freedom-to-operate or filing strategy in edge stream processing.
Concentration at the top means broad architectural claims are likely already covered. Review the leading portfolio's independent claims against your own invention before drafting.
Explore claim scope in EurekaHealthcare informatics, vision recognition and commerce-oriented aggregation each sit under 4% of records — worth a closer look if your invention touches these applications.
Run a white space search in EurekaRecent-year filing counts will rise as publication catches up; treat the apparent 2024 low as a floor, not a trend line, and re-check in future updates.
Set up monitoring in EurekaOne assignee dominates this dataset, holding 85 of the 137 records in scope — roughly 62% of the entire field on its own. The next four assignees combined bring the top-five total to 109 records, or 79.6% of all records. Below the top five, holdings drop to single digits, with tenth place at just 4 records, so the field is best described as one leader followed by a flat mid-tier rather than a gradual long tail.
Filing peaked at 30 records in 2020 and has declined since, falling from 25 in 2021 to 5 in 2024 — an 80% drop over that three-year window. That said, patent publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the lower counts in 2025 and 2026 (14 so far) are not yet reliable evidence of continued decline; they will likely revise upward. The safest reading is that the field cooled from its 2020 peak through 2024, with the most recent years still incomplete.
Digital information transmission (IPC class H04L) appears in 62.0% of the 137 records, making it the dominant class by a wide margin. Wireless communication networks (H04W) follow at 31.4%, and AI-based computing (G06N) appears in 24.8% of records, reflecting the growing overlap between edge transmission architectures and on-device model inference. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these percentages are shares of the full 137-record total and add up to more than 100%.
The smallest IPC shares in this dataset — G06Q (business/commerce), G06V (image/video recognition) and G16H (healthcare informatics), each at 3.6% of records — mark branches where filing density is comparatively low next to the dominant transmission and wireless classes. That does not guarantee an easy path to allowance, but it does suggest fewer competing claims to design around in edge-adjacent commerce, vision, or healthcare applications. Sub-areas like clock synchronization across intermittent links and data prioritization on resource-constrained nodes also show up as recurring but not saturated themes across the corpus.
US12591804B2, assigned to Intel Corporation and published 2026-03-31, covers an edge computing node apparatus that performs federated machine-learning training rounds — including selecting a candidate set of clients, distributing a global model to them, and training on coded data from those selected clients. It sits within the same portfolio driving this field's top-heavy concentration, so claims that overlap its specific client-selection and coded-training-data mechanics are likely to face close scrutiny. Filings that use different aggregation logic, different client-selection criteria, or move the inference step off the federated-training model would sit further from its claim boundary, but a formal freedom-to-operate review of its full claim set is the only way to confirm clearance.
Go past this page: query the whole edge stream processing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page