https://eureka.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/edge-stream-processing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Updated 2026
Edge Stream Processing Patents: Mapping the Leaders and the Open Claim Space
  • One filer dominates. the top five assignees combined account for 109 of 137 records in scope (79.6%), with a single leader holding 85 records outright.
  • Filing has cooled from its peak. activity peaked at 30 records in 2020 and fell from 25 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, an 80% drop over that span — though 2025-26 counts are still filling in as publications lag filing.
  • Wireless and AI classes dominate the mix. H04L covers 62.0% of records and H04W 31.4%, while G06N-tagged AI/inference claims sit in a quarter of the corpus (24.8%), signalling where model-update and local-inference claims cluster.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
137
Published Records
80%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-80%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (25 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 137 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Edge stream processing sits at the intersection of network transmission, resource-constrained computing, and on-device inference. The search scope here pairs edge-computing and in-network aggregation concepts with practical constraints — intermittent connectivity, device resource limits, model updates, and clock synchronization — to isolate filings that treat the edge as a live data-processing environment rather than a passive endpoint. The dataset spans 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off and totals 137 published records, each mapped to its patent family so continuation filings do not inflate the count.

The picture that emerges is concentrated rather than fragmented: a small number of filers built out broad portfolios early, and the pace of new filings has slowed sharply from its 2020 peak. That combination — high concentration plus a cooling curve — matters for anyone deciding whether to file, license, or design around existing claims in this space.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1INTEL CORP85
  2. 2DETECON AL SAUDIA CO LTD10
  3. 3WASS FELIX THOMAS6
  4. 4MA WEIQIANG4
  5. 5CHANDWANI NEELAM4
  6. 6SRIKANTESWARA SRIKATHYAYANI4
  7. 7MARTINEZ SPESSOT CESAR4
  8. 8PALERMO STEPHEN T4
  9. 9METSCH THIJS4
  10. 10CARRANZA MARCOS E4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edge Stream Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 137-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which technology classes carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings were negligible before 2017, climbed to a peak of 30 records in 2020, then declined — 25 records in 2021 down to 5 in 2024, an 80% drop across that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures (including 14 so far in 2026) will revise upward as publication catches up with filing, typically by around 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017-202608152330020172018201930202020212022202320242025142026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H04L (digital information transmission) appears in 62.0% of the 137 records, well ahead of H04W (wireless networks, 31.4%) and G06N (AI-based computing, 24.8%). Smaller shares in G06Q, G06V and G16H (each 3.6%) mark where edge stream processing touches commerce, vision and healthcare applications without yet forming a dense claim cluster. Because records carry multiple classes, these shares sum above 100% and should be read against the 137-record total, not against each other.

IPC subclass compositionH04L · Digital information transmissi…8562.0%H04W · Wireless communication networks4331.4%G06N · Computing based on AI models3424.8%G06F · Electric digital data processi…2518.2%H04B · Transmission (general)1913.9%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…53.6%G06V · Image/video recognition53.6%G16H · Healthcare informatics53.6%Other4230.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 137 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edge Stream Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Edge Stream Processing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about edge stream processing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this space

Representative Filing
US12591804B22026-03-31

US12591804B2 — Systems and methods for distributed learning for wireless edge dynamics

INTEL CORPORATION

The apparatus of an edge computing node, a system, a method and a machine-readable medium. The apparatus includes a processor to perform rounds of federated machine learning training, including processing client reports, selecting a candidate set of clients for an epoch, causing a global model to be sent to that candidate set, and performing the federated training on the selected clients using coded training data from each participant.Assigned to Intel Corporation, published 2026-03-31.

US12591804B2 — patent drawing 1US12591804B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited patents in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20210144517A1Multi-entity resource, security, and service management in edge computing deployments840
2US20220014963A1Reinforcement learning for multi-access traffic management335
3US20230156826A1Edge computing in satellite connectivity environments165
4US20240323657A1Misbehavior detection using data consistency checks for collective perception messages110
5US20230068386A1Systems and methods for distributed learning for wireless edge dynamics106
6WO2020226979A2Multi-entity resource, security, and service management in edge computing deployments101
7WO2021158313A1Systems and methods for distributed learning for wireless edge dynamics90
8US20230177349A1Federated learning optimizations80
9US20220345417A1Technologies for configuring and reducing resource consumption in time-aware networks and time-sensitive appl…72
10US20220191648A1Digital twin framework for next generation networks72

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edge Stream Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for strategy

Three patterns worth acting on before filing or licensing in this space.

Concentration
79.6%
of 137 records held by top 5 assignees

Claim space is held by very few hands

The top five assignees combined account for 109 of the 137 records in scope, with the leader alone holding 85. A field this concentrated leaves little room to file broad claims on the core architecture without running into prior art from one or two portfolios.

Top 5 combined, all-record share
Momentum
-80%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Filing pace has cooled from its 2020 peak

Annual filings fell from 25 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, after peaking at 30 in 2020. That does not mean the technology is exhausted — it more often signals that the dominant players have shifted from broad architectural claims to narrower follow-on filings, or that publication lag is still masking recent activity.

2024 is the last complete year
Composition
62.0%
of records tagged H04L

Transmission claims dominate, AI claims are rising

H04L (digital information transmission) touches nearly two-thirds of records, but G06N (AI-based computing) already appears in a quarter of the corpus — a sign that model-update and local-inference claims are being layered onto established transmission architectures rather than filed as standalone inventions.

Classes overlap; shares sum above 100%
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to edge stream processing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing patterns
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
SMITH NED MGUIM BERNAT FRANCESC8
SMITH NED MDOSHI KSHITIJ ARUN8
GUIM BERNAT FRANCESCDOSHI KSHITIJ ARUN8
DETECON AL SAUDIA CO LTDWASS FELIX THOMAS6
ZHANG YISRIKANTESWARA SRIKATHYAYANI6
Intel CorporationZHANG YI4
Intel CorporationVERRALL TIMOTHY4
Intel CorporationSRIKANTESWARA SRIKATHYAYANI4

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the data, with three pairs tied at 8 shared filings each — a signal of stable internal co-invention teams rather than cross-company joint ventures.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edge Stream Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and what's left open

The assignee ranking covers 92 companies counted by records — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the complete set the data returns. It confirms the concentration seen above, while receiving-office data shows where filers actually sought protection.

Leader
85
records held

One filer sets the pace

The leading assignee holds 85 of the 137 records in scope — well ahead of fifth place, which sits at 4. That gap defines the field: one portfolio, then a steep drop to a mid-tier cluster.

vs. 4 records at 5th place
Mid-tier
4
records at 10th place

A flat mid-tier, then a long tail

Ranks five through ten sit close together at 4 records apiece, together with the leader making up 94.2% of all records. Below that, filers thin out quickly into single- and double-digit contributors.

Top 10 combined: 94.2% of 137
Filing venues
54
US-office records

US and India lead receiving offices

The United States receives the largest share of filings (54), followed by India (26) and the EPO (22), with WIPO/PCT filings (13) indicating some filers are pursuing multi-jurisdiction coverage rather than staying domestic.

Germany 7, Austria 5
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth watching
Smaller IPC shares point to sub-areas where filing density is still low relative to the core transmission and wireless classes.
Clock synchronization across intermittent linksData prioritization at resource-constrained nodesHealthcare informatics at the edge (G16H)Vision/recognition inference on edge nodes (G06V)Commerce-oriented edge aggregation (G06Q)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Intel Corporation0—
SMITH NED M0—
DETECON AL SAUDIA CO LTD0—
GUIM BERNAT FRANCESC0—
DOSHI KSHITIJ ARUN0—
ZHANG YI0—
WASS FELIX THOMAS0—
SRIKANTESWARA SRIKATHYAYANI0—
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edge Stream Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape data points to three practical next steps for teams evaluating freedom-to-operate or filing strategy in edge stream processing.

Check specific claim scope before filing

Concentration at the top means broad architectural claims are likely already covered. Review the leading portfolio's independent claims against your own invention before drafting.

Explore claim scope in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches

Healthcare informatics, vision recognition and commerce-oriented aggregation each sit under 4% of records — worth a closer look if your invention touches these applications.

Run a white space search in Eureka

Watch for the 2025-26 revision

Recent-year filing counts will rise as publication catches up; treat the apparent 2024 low as a floor, not a trend line, and re-check in future updates.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edge Stream Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on edge stream processing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Edge Stream Processing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Edge Stream Processing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole edge stream processing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.