Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-backed look at reciprocating compressor interface engineering patents: filing trends, leading assignees, IPC concentration, and where sealing-interface claim space remains open through 2026.
Filing growth = 2021 (11 records) → 2024 (0); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 108 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
Reciprocating compressor interface engineering covers the physical and control boundary where a piston or rod meets its cylinder liner or seal housing — the geometry, materials and operating logic that keep compressed gas from leaking past a moving part. Across 108 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, filings concentrate heavily in F04B (positive-displacement pump mechanisms) and F16J (pistons, seals and gaskets), with smaller but active pockets in instrumentation and control classes.
The filing curve rose to a peak of 11 records in 2021 and had fallen back to 2 by the 2022 midpoint — a pattern more consistent with a claim space that has been substantially staked out than one still building momentum. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the leading jurisdiction, followed by the European Patent Office, with Australia, WIPO/PCT and Canada trailing at similar volumes.
108 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 trace a filing curve that has already crested, concentrated overwhelmingly in core compressor mechanism and piston-seal classifications.
Filings rose to a peak of 11 in 2021, then fell back to 2 by 2022 — a pattern consistent with a mature mechanical interface rather than an emerging one. The most recent years are undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
F04B (positive-displacement pumps) accounts for the largest share of records at 52, with F16J (pistons, seals and gaskets) second at 20. Instrumentation classes G01D and G05D each hold 12, and adjacent branches — fuel supply (F02M) and pneumatic tyres (B60C) — carry the thinnest coverage in the set.
Shares are the percentage of the 108 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about reciprocating compressor interface engineering and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA seal assembly for a reciprocating rod of a reciprocating compressor, a reciprocating compressor with the seal assembly, and a method of operating the reciprocating compressor with the seal assembly to prevent leakage of gas once the compressor has been shut down. The pressure difference between opposite sides of a static seal is kept low during normal operation to reduce wear of the static seal. When the compressor is shut down, a high pressure difference between opposite sides of the static seal assists with sealing.Filed by Air Products and Chemicals; illustrates the operating-state-dependent sealing strategy that distinguishes newer filings from static full-seal designs.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5342176A | Method and apparatus for measuring piston position in a free piston compressor | 319 |
| 2 | US5496153A | Method and apparatus for measuring piston position in a free piston compressor | 126 |
| 3 | US7308889B2 | High pressure gaseous fuel supply system for an internal combustion engine and a method of sealing connection… | 66 |
| 4 | US20060213488A1 | A high pressure gaseous fuel supply system for an internal combustion engine and a method of sealing connecti… | 37 |
| 5 | US20120192710A1 | Oil-Free Air Compressor for Rail Vehicles | 36 |
| 6 | US20090194174A1 | High-Pressure Valve | 33 |
| 7 | US4676143A | Piston seal device for reciprocating compressor | 21 |
| 8 | US20170002803A1 | Static liquid piston compressor and expander systems and methods for same | 16 |
| 9 | US20150075369A1 | Oil-free air compressor for rail vehicles with air ventilation | 16 |
| 10 | US20150198179A1 | Compressor system with pressure pulsation dampener and check valve | 13 |
Ranked by citation count within this search; older records lead simply by virtue of accumulation time — treat as an influence signal, not a currency signal.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Reading the IPC spread and the citation table together separates where claim space is genuinely occupied from where it merely looks that way.
F04B (positive-displacement pumps) carries more than double the filings of F16J (pistons, seals and gaskets). Teams assuming the seal itself is the crowded part may be missing that broader mechanism claims are the denser obstacle.
The sharp drop from the 2021 peak to the 2022 midpoint is a stronger signal than any single year's count. It suggests the core interface geometry has been substantially claimed, pushing new filers toward adjacent branches.
The two most-cited records both cover free-piston position measurement and predate most current sealing-interface filings. New designs that infer piston position for control or sealing purposes should check these first, regardless of filing date.
With only 10 co-assignee pairs and none exceeding two shared filings, ownership is fragmented across independent filers rather than consolidated through partnership filing — a sign that licensing consolidation has not happened yet.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to reciprocating compressor interface engineering, with the prior art for and against each one.
The filing data points to a mechanism-and-seal space that has been substantially claimed, with the more open work sitting at its edges.
Any static-seal design that changes behaviour between running and shutdown states should be checked against the operating-state-dependent claim structure already in the corpus.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaF02M and B60C carry the thinnest coverage in this dataset relative to the core mechanism classes, making them the more promising direction for a defensible new filing.
Explore white space in EurekaThe two highest-cited records in the corpus are sensing patents, not sealing patents — any control-linked sealing design should clear this reference first.
Pull the citation network in EurekaIt is the boundary where a moving piston or rod contacts a stationary cylinder liner, and where a seal, ring, or gasket manages leakage of the compressed gas across that boundary. Patent filings in this area cover both the physical sealing element (rings, static seals, gaskets) and the operating logic that manages pressure differentials across it. In this dataset the largest single classification touching this interface is F16J, covering pistons, seals and gaskets, with 20 of 108 records.
Filing activity is spread across a mix of industrial gas, rail, and engine-systems companies rather than concentrated in one dominant assignee, and co-assignee pairings are limited to 10 total pairs with a maximum of two shared filings per pair. That thin collaboration signal suggests the field has several parallel filers rather than a single controlling player. The most-cited individual patents in the set belong to free-piston sensing and gaseous-fuel sealing applicants rather than any one company sweeping the rankings.
The filing curve rose to 11 records in 2021 and had fallen to 2 by the 2022 midpoint, which typically indicates that the core mechanical claim space — piston-cylinder sealing geometry and the associated compressor mechanism — has already been substantially staked out. It does not mean the underlying technology has stopped improving; it means fewer applicants see open claim space in the areas already covered by F04B and F16J filings. Readers should also account for publication lag: any filing made in the last 18 months will not yet be fully visible in this trend.
The thinnest coverage sits in adjacent branches: F02M (fuel supply and carburettors) at 10 records and B60C (pneumatic tyres) at 8 records, both well below the core F04B and F16J volumes. This suggests unclaimed combinations exist where sealing-interface geometry meets gaseous-fuel delivery hardware, or where compressor sealing principles could be applied to tyre-inflation or monitoring systems without a dedicated prior claim. First movers combining a specific sealing geometry with one of these adjacent functions have more room to build a defensible claim than those filing straight into F04B or F16J.
Not necessarily — citation counts inside a fixed search corpus tend to favour older patents simply because they have had more years to accumulate citations. The two most-cited records in this set date to the mid-1990s and cover free-piston position measurement, which reflects their foundational role in later compressor control designs rather than current commercial dominance. A newer, less-cited patent can still be the operative blocking reference for a specific design choice being made today.
Go past this page: query the whole reciprocating compressor interface engineering corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page