https://eureka.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/reciprocating-compressor-interface-engineering-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Mechanical Engineering & Machinery
Reciprocating Compressor Interface Engineering Patents

A data-backed look at reciprocating compressor interface engineering patents: filing trends, leading assignees, IPC concentration, and where sealing-interface claim space remains open through 2026.

108
Published Records
59%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (11 records) → 2024 (0); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 108 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A mechanical claim space that has already crested

Reciprocating compressor interface engineering covers the physical and control boundary where a piston or rod meets its cylinder liner or seal housing — the geometry, materials and operating logic that keep compressed gas from leaking past a moving part. Across 108 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, filings concentrate heavily in F04B (positive-displacement pump mechanisms) and F16J (pistons, seals and gaskets), with smaller but active pockets in instrumentation and control classes.

The filing curve rose to a peak of 11 records in 2021 and had fallen back to 2 by the 2022 midpoint — a pattern more consistent with a claim space that has been substantially staked out than one still building momentum. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the leading jurisdiction, followed by the European Patent Office, with Australia, WIPO/PCT and Canada trailing at similar volumes.

Filing volume by year and IPC subclass, 2015–2026
  1. 1WABTEC HLDG CORP22
  2. 2SUNPOWER INC13
  3. 3DELAWARE CAPITAL FORMATION INC10
  4. 4AIR PROD & CHEM INC10
  5. 5EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC9
  6. 6WESTPORT FUEL SYST CANADA INC8
  7. 7PRESSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LLC6
  8. 8WOOD MARK W5
  9. 9TORAD ENGINEERING LLC5
  10. 10CARRIER CORP3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reciprocating Compressor Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

108 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 trace a filing curve that has already crested, concentrated overwhelmingly in core compressor mechanism and piston-seal classifications.

A peak-and-decline filing curve

Filings rose to a peak of 11 in 2021, then fell back to 2 by 2022 — a pattern consistent with a mature mechanical interface rather than an emerging one. The most recent years are undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.

A peak-and-decline filing curve03691202017201820192020112021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Concentration in F04B and F16J

F04B (positive-displacement pumps) accounts for the largest share of records at 52, with F16J (pistons, seals and gaskets) second at 20. Instrumentation classes G01D and G05D each hold 12, and adjacent branches — fuel supply (F02M) and pneumatic tyres (B60C) — carry the thinnest coverage in the set.

Concentration in F04B and F16JF04B · Positive-displacement pumps5248.1%F16J · Pistons, seals & gaskets2018.5%G01D · Measuring (general) & recording1211.1%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…1211.1%F04C · Rotary-piston pumps1110.2%F16K · Valves & taps1110.2%F02M · Fuel supply & carburettors109.3%B60C · Pneumatic tyres87.4%Other3532.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 108 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reciprocating Compressor Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Reciprocating Compressor Interface Engineering with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about reciprocating compressor interface engineering and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records defining this space

Representative Filing
US20200102946A12020-04-02

Seal Assembly for Reciprocating Compressor (US20200102946A1)

AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.

A seal assembly for a reciprocating rod of a reciprocating compressor, a reciprocating compressor with the seal assembly, and a method of operating the reciprocating compressor with the seal assembly to prevent leakage of gas once the compressor has been shut down. The pressure difference between opposite sides of a static seal is kept low during normal operation to reduce wear of the static seal. When the compressor is shut down, a high pressure difference between opposite sides of the static seal assists with sealing.Filed by Air Products and Chemicals; illustrates the operating-state-dependent sealing strategy that distinguishes newer filings from static full-seal designs.

US20200102946A1 — patent drawing 1US20200102946A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing in Eureka
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5342176AMethod and apparatus for measuring piston position in a free piston compressor319
2US5496153AMethod and apparatus for measuring piston position in a free piston compressor126
3US7308889B2High pressure gaseous fuel supply system for an internal combustion engine and a method of sealing connection…66
4US20060213488A1A high pressure gaseous fuel supply system for an internal combustion engine and a method of sealing connecti…37
5US20120192710A1Oil-Free Air Compressor for Rail Vehicles36
6US20090194174A1High-Pressure Valve33
7US4676143APiston seal device for reciprocating compressor21
8US20170002803A1Static liquid piston compressor and expander systems and methods for same16
9US20150075369A1Oil-free air compressor for rail vehicles with air ventilation16
10US20150198179A1Compressor system with pressure pulsation dampener and check valve13

Ranked by citation count within this search; older records lead simply by virtue of accumulation time — treat as an influence signal, not a currency signal.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reciprocating Compressor Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the filing pattern tells a design team

Reading the IPC spread and the citation table together separates where claim space is genuinely occupied from where it merely looks that way.

Mechanism vs. interface
52 vs. 20
F04B records vs. F16J records

The compressor mechanism, not the seal, is most contested

F04B (positive-displacement pumps) carries more than double the filings of F16J (pistons, seals and gaskets). Teams assuming the seal itself is the crowded part may be missing that broader mechanism claims are the denser obstacle.

Source: IPC subclass distribution, 108 families
Filing momentum
11 → 2
Peak (2021) vs. 2022 midpoint

A curve that has already turned down

The sharp drop from the 2021 peak to the 2022 midpoint is a stronger signal than any single year's count. It suggests the core interface geometry has been substantially claimed, pushing new filers toward adjacent branches.

Filing trend, 2017–2026 (2026 partial)
Citation weight
319 citations
Top-cited record, free-piston sensing

Old sensing patents still anchor the field

The two most-cited records both cover free-piston position measurement and predate most current sealing-interface filings. New designs that infer piston position for control or sealing purposes should check these first, regardless of filing date.

Most-cited records, this corpus
Collaboration density
10 pairs
Total co-assignee pairs, max 2 shared filings

No joint-filing bloc controls the space

With only 10 co-assignee pairs and none exceeding two shared filings, ownership is fragmented across independent filers rather than consolidated through partnership filing — a sign that licensing consolidation has not happened yet.

Co-assignee pair analysis, 108 families
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to reciprocating compressor interface engineering, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Derived observations on the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reciprocating Compressor Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing data points to a mechanism-and-seal space that has been substantially claimed, with the more open work sitting at its edges.

Check the shutdown-state sealing claim before designing a new rod seal

Any static-seal design that changes behaviour between running and shutdown states should be checked against the operating-state-dependent claim structure already in the corpus.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Explore the fuel-supply and tyre-interface adjacencies

F02M and B60C carry the thinnest coverage in this dataset relative to the core mechanism classes, making them the more promising direction for a defensible new filing.

Explore white space in Eureka

Route around the free-piston sensing patents, not just the seal patents

The two highest-cited records in the corpus are sensing patents, not sealing patents — any control-linked sealing design should clear this reference first.

Pull the citation network in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reciprocating Compressor Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reciprocating Compressor Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Reciprocating Compressor Interface Engineering in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole reciprocating compressor interface engineering corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.