2D Sketch Projection Onto 3D Models Using Grid-Based Wrapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CAD software has limitations in wrapping a 2D sketch onto 3D models, particularly on non-developable surfaces, and often results in distorted or incomplete patterns.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based method that transforms a 2D sketch onto a 3D model by placing it on a 2D grid, mapping the grid onto the 3D model using a marching algorithm, and projecting the resulting 3D image onto the model to create curves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If current wrapping systems are used to wrap a 2D sketch onto a 3D model, then the wrapping operation can be performed, but the result is distorted or incomplete patterns especially on non-developable surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrapping accuracyVSAvoidsurface type compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional 2D flattening approaches to a 3D grid-based mapping system. By creating a 3D grid that conforms to the complex surface geometry and mapping the 2D sketch onto this 3D structure, the system achieves accurate wrapping on non-developable surfaces without the distortion inherent in 2D flattening methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs marching algorithms that systematically vary grid parameters and mapping coordinates to transform the 2D sketch into a 3D wrapped representation. By dynamically adjusting grid density, resolution, and transformation parameters, the system adapts to different surface types while maintaining wrapping precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a 2D sketch is flattened before wrapping onto a 3D model, then the wrapping process can be simplified, but the model undergoes deformation that reduces accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrapping process simplicityVSAvoidmodel accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of flattening the 3D model to 2D and then wrapping, the patent inverts the approach by creating a 3D grid structure and mapping the 2D sketch onto it. This reversal eliminates the need for flattening while preserving model accuracy, as the 3D grid naturally conforms to the target surface geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a 3D grid as an intermediary structure between the 2D sketch and the 3D model. This grid serves as a mediator that transforms the simple 2D sketch into an accurate 3D wrapped representation without requiring deformation of either the sketch or the target model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If traditional wrapping methods are used on non-developable surfaces, then the operation can be completed, but surface distortion increases as the flattening process expands from the starting location

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrapping operation completionVSAvoidsurface continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the wrapping operation into discrete grid cells that are processed individually through marching algorithms. By segmenting the continuous surface into manageable grid units, the system maintains local accuracy at each cell while building up the complete wrapped representation, preventing cumulative distortion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies marching algorithms that process the grid incrementally cell-by-cell rather than attempting to flatten the entire surface at once. This partial action approach allows precise control over each grid cell's transformation, maintaining surface continuity and minimizing distortion accumulation across the entire model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4546273A1Wrapping a two-dimensional (2D) sketch onto a three-dimensional (3D) model
Publication Date: 2025.04.30 DASSAULT SYSTEMES SOLIDWORKS CORP
  • EP4546273A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4546273A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4546273A1 patent drawingFigure 2C~2D

AI summary

A computer-based method is disclosed of wrapping a two-dimensional (2D) sketch onto a three-dimensional (3D) model. The method includes placing the 2D sketch onto a 2D grid, transforming the 2D grid to an initial location relative to the 3D model, mapping the 2D grid onto the 3D model to produce a 3D grid wrapped around the 3D model, evaluating the 2D sketch onto the 3D grid to produce a 3D image wrapped around the 3D model, wherein the 3D image wrapped around the 3D model corresponds to (e.g., has a similar appearance to, and was generated from) the 2D sketch, and creating one or more curves on the 3D model by projecting the 3D image onto the 3D model.