3D-to-2D Garment Patternmaking for Rapid Custom Fit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The traditional custom-made clothing industry is hindered by the time-consuming and labor-intensive process of creating patterns, which requires skilled tailors and patternmakers and can take weeks or months, making it unsuitable for one-off, customized clothing production.

Innovation Solution

The development of a system and method for automated pattern making that generates 3D models based on body measurements, style, and fit, which are then converted into multiple 2D models, adjusted for manufacturing needs, and used directly for cutting and assembling custom-fit clothing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional manual pattern making methods are used, then skilled tailors can create custom-fit garments, but the process takes weeks or months and requires frequent fittings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustom fit qualityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of measurement and pattern drafting with an automated digital system. A 3D body scanner captures body geometry, and software algorithms automatically generate accurate patterns, eliminating the need for skilled tailors to manually measure and draft while maintaining custom fit quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system captures precise body measurements as digital parameters and uses computational algorithms to transform these parameters into pattern dimensions. This parameter-based approach ensures mathematical precision in fit while dramatically reducing the time required compared to manual iterative adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automated pattern making systems are implemented, then production time is reduced, but the systems fail to account for material characteristics and garment necessities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidpattern accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations during pattern generation to determine the exact amount of ease and allowances needed for seams, hems, and fabric characteristics. By pre-calculating these parameters based on the specific garment type and material properties, the system ensures accurate patterns are generated immediately without requiring subsequent manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where garment specifications, material properties, and design requirements are fed into the algorithm to adjust pattern dimensions accordingly. This ensures the automated system accounts for all garment necessities and material characteristics while maintaining high production speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If scaled patterns are created for different sizes, then large volume manufacturing is enabled, but the scaled patterns do not produce suitable garments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize rangeVSAvoidfit quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the body into multiple measurement points and segments, capturing detailed geometry at each location. When scaling to different sizes, the system adjusts each segment independently based on its specific requirements rather than applying uniform scaling, ensuring proper fit across the entire size range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parametric modeling where pattern dimensions are defined by mathematical relationships between body measurements. When size changes, the parameters are recalculated based on the new measurement set rather than simple scaling, maintaining anatomical proportionality and fit quality across all sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12339643B2Method and system for automating 3D to 2D custom fit pattern making
Publication Date: 2025.06.24 TRI-D TECH INC
  • US12339643B2 patent drawing
  • US12339643B2 patent drawing
  • US12339643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for automated patternmaking. To create patterns for use in manufacturing a desired piece of clothing, body measurements, style, and fit are entered and a suitable 3D model of the piece of clothing is generated based on those body measurements, style and fit. Once finalized, the surface of the 3D model is converted into multiple 2D models, each 2D model corresponding to an expected pattern for the piece of clothing. These 2D models are then finalized by being adjusted for manufacturing needs. The resulting patterns from the 2D models are then used as the required patterns for manufacturing the piece of clothing. The process may be used in other types of manufacturing that requires patterns to be generated.