3D Asset Evaluation Feedback for Autonomous Vehicle Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in accurately simulating and training for uncommon scenarios due to discrepancies between physical and simulated environments, affecting the effectiveness of machine learning models.

Innovation Solution

A 3D asset evaluation system provides a feedback loop to improve 3D assets used in simulations, reducing performance gaps between physical and virtual worlds by iteratively refining 3D assets based on sensor data and machine learning model feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If 3D assets are used in simulations to train machine learning models for autonomous vehicles, then the productivity of model training is improved, but the measurement precision between physical and simulated environments deteriorates due to discrepancies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training efficiencyVSAvoidsimulation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback loop where machine learning models evaluate 3D assets in simulated environments, and the results are used to iteratively refine and improve the assets. This closed-loop approach continuously reduces the domain gap between physical and simulated worlds, enhancing simulation accuracy while maintaining training productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of 3D assets using machine learning models before they are fully integrated into simulation pipelines. By assessing assets upfront and identifying discrepancies early, the system prevents propagation of errors and reduces the need for extensive retraining later

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If complex 3D scenes are created to represent uncommon scenarios, then the adaptability of machine learning models is improved, but the device complexity of the simulation system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario coverageVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments complex 3D scenes into individual assets and evaluates them separately using machine learning models. This modular approach allows comprehensive coverage of uncommon scenarios while managing complexity through systematic, asset-by-asset assessment and refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If iterative refinement of 3D assets is performed to reduce performance gaps, then the measurement precision is improved, but the loss of time in the evaluation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs machine learning models to automatically evaluate and assess 3D assets without requiring manual inspection or adjustment. This self-service evaluation mechanism accelerates the iterative refinement process by eliminating time-consuming human review while maintaining high measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12596856B2Asset evaluation system for autonomous vehicle simulations
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 GM CRUISE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12596856B2 patent drawing
  • US12596856B2 patent drawing
  • US12596856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media are disclosed for a quick evaluation system for three-dimensional (3D) assets used in simulations for an autonomous vehicle (AV). A disclosed method comprises receiving drive data recorded in a physical environment by a vehicle having a first sensor; simulating the first sensor associated with a virtual autonomous vehicle in a virtual environment of a 3D scene including an object that at least partially corresponds to the physical environment; evaluating simulated data based on the simulation of the first sensor using a machine learning (ML) model; comparing evaluation data recorded during the evaluation of the simulation of the first sensor using the ML model to the drive data recorded in the physical environment; and generating a report based on a comparison of the evaluation data to a portion of the drive data to determine metrics associated with the object in the virtual environment.