3D Building Modeling From Ground-Level Images for Accurate Facade Dimensions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 3D building models generated from aerial imagery have limited texture resolution, geometry quality, are expensive, time-consuming, and lack robust real-time image data analytics, making them unsuitable for consumer and commercial use cases.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for creating 3D blueprints using ground-level images captured from multiple perspectives, employing image processing techniques to identify architectural elements, calculate dimensions, and generate scaled multi-dimensional models with material and cost estimates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If aerial imagery is used to generate 3D building models, then coverage area is improved, but texture resolution and geometry quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidtexture resolution and geometry quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines aerial imagery with ground-level images to create composite 3D building models. The system merges data from multiple sources (aerial photos for overall structure, ground-level images for detailed textures) to simultaneously achieve wide coverage area and high texture resolution, resolving the contradiction between these two parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from purely aerial (top-down) 2D imagery to multi-dimensional modeling by incorporating ground-level perspective images. This dimensional change allows the system to capture both macro-scale building footprints and micro-scale architectural details, improving texture resolution and geometry quality while maintaining coverage area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If specialized camera-equipped vehicles are used, then image quality is improved, but cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcost and time efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs standard smartphones with conventional cameras as imaging devices, making the system universally accessible and cost-effective. The multi-functional approach allows the same device to capture both aerial photos (when mounted on drones or buildings) and ground-level images, eliminating the need for specialized expensive equipment while maintaining image quality through software processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical imaging systems (specialized camera-equipped vehicles) with software-based image processing techniques. Advanced algorithms process images from simple camera devices to generate high-quality 3D models, substituting mechanical complexity with computational intelligence, thereby reducing cost and time while maintaining image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If traditional 3D mapping methods are used, then model accuracy is improved, but update difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidupdate difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic updating mechanism where the system can continuously capture new images using mobile devices and automatically regenerate 3D building models. This dynamic approach allows frequent, easy updates to maintain model accuracy without the complexity of traditional re-surveying processes, resolving the contradiction between model accuracy and update difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If aerial imagery alone is used, then data collection is simplified, but real-time analytics capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection simplicityVSAvoidreal-time image data analytics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data collection process into distinct components: aerial imagery for structural information and ground-level images for detailed architectural features. This segmentation allows the system to process different types of images through specialized algorithms, enabling comprehensive real-time analytics on building materials, dimensions, and features while keeping the overall system manageable through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250371801A13D building analyzer
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 HOVER INC
  • US20250371801A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371801A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371801A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method is provided for constructing a labeled and dimensioned multidimensional (e.g., 3D) building model from building object imagery (e.g., ground-level imagery). The method begins by retrieve building object imagery, the building object imagery collected based on directed capture with a mobile device. The method continues by constructing a scaled multi-dimensional building model, the scale based on sizing of at least one selected architectural feature. The method continues by identifying architectural elements within facades of the multi-dimensional building model. The method continues by determining dimensions of at least one of the architectural elements, the dimensions based on the scale. The method continues by determining dimensions (e.g., area) of at least one of the architectural elements. The method continues by labeling each identified architectural element with at least an identifier and by labeling at least one of the architectural elements with the determined dimensions.