3D CPU Bus Interrupt Architecture for Single-Cycle Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-CPU computing systems face challenges in achieving flexible functional partitioning, managing computing context, and reducing latency and overhead during interrupts, often necessitating complex hardware-based solutions.

Innovation Solution

A 3D dataflow architecture using Reconfigurable Algorithmic Pipeline Cores (RAPCs) with a metatag-based priority system allows for single clock cycle interrupt response and minimal cycle disruption, eliminating the need for complex interrupt structures and context switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional multi-CPU interrupt structures are used, then interrupt handling capability is provided, but latency and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrupt latencyVSAvoidinterrupt structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interrupt handling function is segmented from the main CPU computing sequence. A dedicated interrupt processing path is created that operates independently, allowing interrupt service routines to execute without blocking the main computational flow. This segmentation enables single-cycle interrupt response while maintaining complex interrupt handling capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a third dimension (Z-axis) to the traditional 2D CPU array architecture. This additional dimension provides dedicated interrupt processing resources that coexist with the main computing planes, enabling fast interrupt response without interfering with normal computational operations. The Z-axis layers handle interrupt context switching and service routine execution separately from the X-Y plane computing tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If complex interrupt structures are implemented, then full vectored interrupt capability is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevectored interrupt capabilityVSAvoidinterrupt structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dedicated interrupt processing path and Z-axis resources are designed to handle multiple types of interrupt scenarios universally. The same infrastructure supports both simple and complex vectored interrupt operations, providing full interrupt capability without requiring separate specialized structures for different interrupt types. This multi-functional design achieves versatility without proportional increases in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If context switching is performed during interrupts, then interrupt service is provided, but computing context management becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrupt service capabilityVSAvoidcontext management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The context switching operation is extracted from the main CPU computing path and placed in the dedicated interrupt processing path. This extraction allows context management to occur independently without affecting the main computational sequence. The interrupt processing units handle context save/restore operations separately, simplifying the overall system by isolating complex context management from the primary computing flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Loss of time

If fast interrupt response is achieved, then latency is reduced, but overhead in main computing sequences increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterrupt response timeVSAvoidmain computing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing system is segmented into independent processing paths: the main CPU computing sequence continues uninterrupted in the X-Y planes while interrupt service routines execute in the dedicated Z-axis path. This segmentation ensures that fast interrupt response does not consume cycles from the main computing sequence, as the two operations occur in parallel independent channels. The main computing throughput is preserved because interrupt handling is performed by separate dedicated resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250298772A1Computer architecture 3D bus interrupt
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 ICAT LLC D B A TURING MICRO
  • US20250298772A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298772A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298772A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A multiple CPU pseudo 3D structure is provided that allows single clock cycle interrupt latency, requires no context storage while taking only a single cycle away from normal programs. Multiple interrupts are given flexible vectored parallel computing responses without timing interactions.