3D Camera Monitoring for Packaging Error Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In a distribution center, manual data acquisition during the packaging process leads to errors such as quantity and identification errors, which are only discovered at the customer level, due to the reliance on human visual inspection and barcode scanning for entering product information into a Warehouse Management System (WMS).

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a camera system with depth sensors to record images and perform three-dimensional measurements of articles being packaged, comparing these measurements with specifications stored in the WMS, and issuing warnings for discrepancies, while also monitoring article placement and weight to prevent errors and potential theft.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual data acquisition by employees is used, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but packaging errors and identification errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging accuracyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations (visual inspection, barcode scanning, data entry) with automated optical and sensor-based systems. Cameras capture images of articles, depth sensors measure dimensions, and automated systems compare data against specifications, eliminating human error while maintaining process flexibility through programmable validation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service monitoring where the packaging process automatically validates its own output. The camera system and depth sensors continuously monitor packaged articles, automatically detect deviations from specifications, and trigger warnings without requiring employee intervention, making the system self-correcting and highly reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If automated camera systems with depth sensors are implemented, then packaging accuracy and error detection improve, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs multi-functional integrated sensors that perform multiple measurement tasks simultaneously. The depth sensors and cameras serve both dimensional measurement and positional monitoring functions, while the same system validates both article identity and packaging correctness, reducing the need for separate specialized devices and simplifying overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary comparison process where captured images and measured dimensions are automatically compared against pre-stored specification data. This intermediary validation layer simplifies the system by decoupling the complex sensing operations from the decision-making logic, allowing standard sensors to work with programmable validation rules rather than requiring complex integrated intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring of article placement is performed, then detection of misplaced articles and theft prevention improve, but processing time and operational speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidpackaging speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous monitoring where cameras and depth sensors operate throughout the entire packaging process without interruption. Articles are monitored from placement into packaging through sealing, with continuous validation of dimensional specifications and positional correctness, ensuring error detection occurs at every stage without requiring separate inspection steps that would slow production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs rapid automated validation that skips manual inspection steps. The camera and depth sensor systems capture and process data in real-time during packaging operations, immediately comparing measurements against specifications and flagging deviations without pausing the packaging line, thereby maintaining high productivity while ensuring continuous error detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces packaging errors by accurately identifying and quantifying articles, preventing incorrect packaging and theft, and automating the monitoring process to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the packaging process.

Implementation Method 1

In various specific embodiments of the method, the camera used to record the image is realized as a depth camera, a time-of-flight camera, or as a stereo camera

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 2

In another specific embodiment of the present invention, as depth sensor a laser is provided that can be installed directly in the camera or can also be positioned locally outside it

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS11245873B2Method and camera system for monitoring a packaging process
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11245873B2 patent drawing
  • US11245873B2 patent drawing
  • US11245873B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for monitoring a packaging process of at least one article. In the method, a sort of an article is acquired before it is placed in a transport container. At least one image and at least one depth measurement of the article are recorded after it is placed in the transport container. The three-dimensional dimensions of the article are calculated and are compared with a specification for the acquired sort of the article. If the dimensions of the article do not agree with the specification, a warning is issued.