3D Display Calibration for Crosstalk Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autostereoscopic 3D display devices face image quality deterioration due to manufacturing errors in the size and position of optical layers, leading to crosstalk and distorted images.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine calibration parameters for 3D display devices by analyzing images of first and second patterns, using subpixels and optical layers, to accurately calibrate the propagation direction of light and reduce crosstalk, involving the use of a lens array, parallax barrier, or directional backlight unit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manufacturing errors occur in the size and position of optical layers, then production cost is reduced, but image quality deteriorates due to crosstalk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing toleranceVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing calibration before actual 3D display operations. A calibration pattern is displayed and captured to determine the actual position and size of the optical layer, allowing correction parameters to be calculated in advance. This enables the system to compensate for manufacturing errors without requiring precise manufacturing tolerances, thus maintaining image quality while easing manufacturing constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through a calibration process where the actual optical layer parameters are measured and fed back into the system. The captured image of the calibration pattern is processed to determine real position and size, which then updates the rendering parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to manufacturing variations and maintain accurate 3D display performance despite tolerances in optical layer production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If calibration parameters are determined using traditional methods, then manufacturing precision is required, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical layer positioning accuracyVSAvoidcalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the display system to automatically calibrate itself without external intervention. The system displays a calibration pattern, captures it with a camera, processes the image to determine optical layer parameters, and automatically generates correction data. This self-calibration capability eliminates the need for complex external measurement equipment and manual alignment procedures, reducing device complexity while maintaining or improving positioning accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating a virtual representation of the calibration pattern and comparing it with the captured image. The known geometric relationships of the calibration pattern serve as a reference model, allowing the system to extract optical layer parameters through image processing. This approach simplifies the calibration process compared to direct physical measurement methods, reducing device complexity while achieving accurate parameter determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If the optical layer position is not precisely controlled, then ease of installation is improved, but crosstalk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation flexibilityVSAvoidcrosstalk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting rendering parameters based on measured optical layer characteristics. Instead of relying on fixed design values, the system determines actual position and size parameters through calibration and uses these measured values to compute corrected rendering parameters. This allows the system to compensate for installation variations and maintain accurate 3D display performance even when optical layer positioning is not precise, thereby reducing crosstalk while improving installation flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10771771B2Method of determining calibration parameter for three-dimensional (3D) display device and 3D display device using the method
Publication Date: 2020.09.08 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US10771771B2 patent drawing
  • US10771771B2 patent drawing
  • US10771771B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining a calibration parameter for a three-dimensional (3D) display device includes determining a calibration parameter for a 3D display device based on an image of a second pattern three-dimensionally converted from an image of a first pattern.