3D Vehicle Display Depth Adaptation for Critical Object Awareness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle systems fail to adequately increase situational awareness for operators due to inaccurate sensor data, limited field-of-view, and complex interfaces, leading to decreased safety and comfort by ignoring visual cues and generating false alerts.

Innovation Solution

An adaptation system alters the display depth of 3D displays by varying the separation degree between objects based on real depth and safety parameters, positioning objects in layers to highlight relevant objects and prevent collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vehicle systems use complex interfaces with multiple alerts and visual cues to increase situational awareness, then awareness may improve, but device complexity increases and ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituational awarenessVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and emphasizes only the most critical objects for operator awareness by selectively adjusting their display depth based on safety parameters, rather than presenting all detected objects equally. This removes unnecessary visual clutter while maintaining awareness of essential hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different display depth adjustments to different objects based on their individual safety parameters and relevance to the operator. Critical objects receive enhanced depth adjustment while less important objects maintain normal display characteristics, creating localized quality variations that improve awareness without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If vehicle systems adjust display depth for all detected objects to improve awareness, then situational awareness increases, but computational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituational awarenessVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments objects into different categories based on their safety parameters and relevance to operator awareness. Only objects meeting specific criteria undergo display depth adjustment, while others are processed normally. This segmentation reduces the computational burden of depth adjustment while maintaining awareness of critical objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies display depth adjustment partially - only to objects that meet specific safety parameter thresholds rather than all detected objects. This partial action approach provides sufficient awareness enhancement for critical objects while avoiding the excessive computational cost of processing every object in the environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If vehicle systems use auditory alerts to notify operators of detected objects, then awareness may improve, but operators tend to ignore the alerts decreasing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert effectivenessVSAvoidoperator response
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from auditory alerts to visual depth adjustment in the spatial dimension of display. By manipulating the perceived depth and position of objects in the visual field, the system provides intuitive spatial awareness that operators can process more effectively than auditory signals, improving response to critical situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If vehicle systems add graphic material and alter object appearance to highlight important objects, then awareness increases, but device complexity and computational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject highlightingVSAvoiddisplay complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the depth parameter of objects in the display rather than adding graphic material or altering appearance. By adjusting the z-coordinate or depth perception parameters of critical objects, the system achieves effective highlighting through spatial positioning changes alone, avoiding the complexity of multiple graphic overlays and appearance modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260012563A1Systems and methods for adapting a display depth of an object around a vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 TOYOTA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
  • US20260012563A1 patent drawing
  • US20260012563A1 patent drawing
  • US20260012563A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and other embodiments described herein relate to identifying objects and adapting display depth of a three-dimensional (3D) display for an object that increases situational awareness. In one embodiment, a method includes identifying objects within a field-of-view (FOV) using real depth that is detected by a vehicle. The method also includes positioning the objects within layers using the real depth and a display depth. The method also includes altering the display depth for the objects with a separation degree between the layers using a safety parameter, the display depth is associated with coordinate points of a display. The method also includes receiving a driving command according to the display depth.