3D Electrode Constraint Structure for Battery Cycle Life

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional energy storage devices face challenges with reliability and cycle life due to electrode expansion and contraction during charging and discharging, leading to potential electrical short circuits and device failure.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of three-dimensional structures with a constraint that maintains pressure on the electrode assembly, inhibiting expansion and buckling by applying greater pressure in the stacking direction than in perpendicular directions, thereby enhancing energy density and cycle life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional two-dimensional laminar architectures are used, then device structure is simple, but energy density and active material utilization are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from conventional two-dimensional laminar electrode architectures to three-dimensional stacked architectures. The electrodes are arranged in multiple layers stacked along a longitudinal axis, with alternating positive and negative electrodes separated by microporous separators. This dimensional change increases the surface area and active material volume within the same geometric footprint, thereby improving energy density and active material utilization while maintaining structural simplicity through regular stacking patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If electrode materials are coated onto single foil and compressed, then manufacturing is simple, but electrode expansion and contraction cause reliability issues and short circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle lifeVSAvoidelectrode structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode assembly is segmented into multiple discrete electrode layers (positive and negative electrodes) stacked alternately along a longitudinal axis. Each electrode layer is separated by microporous separators, creating a modular structure. This segmentation allows each layer to expand and contract independently during charging and discharging cycles, preventing stress concentration and electrical short circuits that occur in monolithic compressed structures, thereby improving reliability and cycle life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If three-dimensional architecture is implemented, then energy density increases, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactive material utilizationVSAvoidstructure assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple electrode layers, microporous separators, and constraint structures into a single integrated three-dimensional stacked assembly. The electrodes are stacked alternately along a longitudinal axis with separators between them, forming a compact unit that maximizes active material utilization. The constraint structure is integrated to maintain pressure on the entire assembly, preventing individual layer deformation. This merging approach enables the complex three-dimensional architecture to be manufactured as a unified structure, reducing assembly steps while achieving high energy density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250273729A1Constraints for energy storage devices
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 ENOVIX CORP
  • US20250273729A1 patent drawing
  • US20250273729A1 patent drawing
  • US20250273729A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy storage device, the energy storage device including a constraint that maintains a pressure on a unit cell configured for energy storage, e.g., during use of the unit cell.