3D Electrode Constraint Structure for Battery Cycle Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional secondary batteries face reliability and cycle life issues due to electrode expansion and contraction during charging and discharging, leading to potential electrical short circuits and device failure.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of three-dimensional energy storage devices with a constraint that maintains pressure on the electrode assembly, inhibiting expansion and buckling by arranging electrode and counter-electrode structures in an alternating sequence and using compression and tension members to apply compressive forces, thereby enhancing energy density and retrieval rate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional two-dimensional laminar battery architecture is used, then device simplicity is maintained, but energy density and active material utilization are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidbattery architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from conventional two-dimensional laminar battery architecture to a three-dimensional architecture where electrode structures extend vertically between current collectors. This dimensional change increases the surface area of active material per unit volume, thereby increasing energy density and active material utilization without fundamentally changing the basic battery components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If electrode materials are coated onto single foil and compressed, then manufacturing is simplified, but electrode expansion and contraction during cycling causes reliability issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle lifeVSAvoidelectrode structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode assembly is divided into multiple discrete electrode structures (positive and negative) stacked in alternating sequence with separators between them. This segmentation allows each electrode structure to be independently supported by the current collectors, reducing mechanical stress and improving reliability during cycling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different structural characteristics to different parts of the electrode assembly. The electrode structures have specific geometric features (surface area to footprint ratio) that optimize both electrical performance and mechanical stability, with current collectors providing structural support at specific locations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If three-dimensional electrode architecture is implemented, then energy density increases, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactive material utilizationVSAvoidelectrode stacking
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The three-dimensional electrode architecture is designed with electrode structures that extend vertically between current collectors in a stacked arrangement. This configuration increases active material surface area and utilization while maintaining manufacturability through standardized stacking procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution increases energy density and supports higher energy retrieval rates while minimizing electron and ion transfer distances, improving the reliability and cycle life of secondary batteries, especially in applications with limited geometric area.

Implementation Method 1

a constraint that maintains a pressure on the electrode assembly as the energy storage device is cycled between the charged and the discharged states

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

carrier ions, such as lithium, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium or aluminum ions, move between a positive electrode and a negative electrode through an electrolyte

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon transport: Ion Exchange

Implementation Method 3

an electrically insulating microporous separator material between members of the electrode and counter-electrode populations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPorosity: Porosity

Data Source

PatentUS11894512B2Longitudinal constraints for energy storage devices
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 ENOVIX CORP
  • US11894512B2 patent drawing
  • US11894512B2 patent drawing
  • US11894512B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A energy storage device for cycling between a charged state and a discharged state, the energy storage device including an enclosure, an electrode assembly and a non-aqueous liquid electrolyte within the enclosure, and a constraint that maintains a pressure on the electrode assembly as the energy storage device is cycled between the charged and the discharged states.