3D Encoded Geometry for Component Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information handling systems rely on aesthetically unpleasing and prone-to-damage unique identifiers like barcodes and QR codes for identification, which add cost, complexity, and risk of error in the fabrication process.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for fabricating a three-dimensional encoded geometry that passively represents a unique code using multi-dimensional symbols, allowing for computer vision-based identification without additional labeling or machine learning, and can be integrated aesthetically into the system components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional barcodes or QR codes are used for identification, then the identification process is simple, but the identifiers are aesthetically unpleasing, prone to damage, and require extra labeling processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling processVSAvoididentifier durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the identification function with the structural component itself. The unique identifier is integrated into the geometry of the part (e.g., contours, protrusions, indentations) rather than being a separate label or sticker. This eliminates the need for additional labeling processes and ensures the identifier becomes an inherent, durable part of the component that cannot be scratched off or damaged separately from the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional flat codes (barcodes, QR codes) to three-dimensional geometric features. The unique identifier is encoded in the spatial arrangement and shape of the part itself, adding a dimensional aspect that makes the identifier more robust and aesthetically integrated while maintaining scanability through computer vision systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If unique identifiers are visibly attached to systems, then identification is easy, but the identifiers don't blend in with the system and require extra processes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveidentificationVSAvoidlabeling process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The identification function is merged with the structural component. The unique identifier is encoded in the geometry of the part itself (contours, shapes, protrusions, indentations) rather than being a separate visible label. This eliminates extra labeling processes while maintaining easy identification through computer vision scanning of the geometric features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The geometric features of the part serve multiple functions: they provide the structural form of the component and simultaneously encode the unique identifier. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate identification labels and reduces overall device complexity while maintaining ease of operation for identification purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If traditional identifiers are used, then the process is straightforward, but more information cannot be encoded efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata encoding capacityVSAvoidencoding structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent encodes information in three-dimensional geometric space rather than two-dimensional flat codes. By utilizing spatial arrangements, contours, and geometric features in 3D, the system can encode significantly more information within the same physical footprint. The unique identifier can incorporate multiple data points (serial numbers, manufacturing dates, specifications) through the complex spatial configuration of the geometric features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The unique identifier is segmented into multiple geometric features (protrusions, indentations, contours) that can each represent different data elements. This segmentation allows for efficient encoding of multiple pieces of information across different geometric characteristics, increasing the total information capacity while maintaining a compact structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10832016B1Three dimensional encoded geometry fabrication operation
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 DELL PROD LP
  • US10832016B1 patent drawing
  • US10832016B1 patent drawing
  • US10832016B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method, and computer-readable medium for performing a three dimensional encoded geometry fabrication operation. In various embodiments, the three dimensional encoded geometry fabrication operation comprises: identifying data to be encoded within the three dimensional encoded geometry, the data to be encoded within the three dimensional encoded geometry comprising a unique code to be associated with the three dimensional encoded geometry; converting the data to be encoded to the three dimensional encoded geometry; fabricating a part with the three dimensional encoded geometry, the three dimensional encoded geometry passively representing the unique code with a physical code; and, performing a computer vision operation to read the physical code of the three dimensional encoded geometry, the computer vision operation confirming the unique code of the three dimensional encoded geometry corresponds to the physical code of the three dimensional encoded geometry.