3D Model Error Highlighting With Elimination Condition Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing design assistance systems only notify users of manufacturing errors without providing clear guidance on how to address them, leading to excessive and potentially incorrect design changes by non-expert users.

Innovation Solution

A design assistance system that includes an item recognition unit, designation condition recognition unit, error condition recognition unit, elimination condition recognition unit, and display unit to highlight error sections and provide specific elimination conditions, allowing users to easily identify and correct design errors without expert knowledge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the system only notifies users of manufacturing errors without providing guidance, then the system complexity is low, but the ease of operation deteriorates because non-expert users cannot make appropriate design changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of making appropriate design changesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by pre-defining error criteria and elimination conditions, and pre-calculating multiple candidate elimination conditions with their impacts. This allows the system to present ready-made solutions to users without requiring them to perform complex analysis themselves, thereby improving ease of operation while managing system complexity through advance preparation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between the error notification and the final design decision. It introduces multiple elimination conditions with different impacts (on delivery date, price, etc.) as intermediate options, allowing users to make informed decisions without needing expert knowledge. This intermediary layer provides structured guidance while maintaining system manageability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the system provides multiple candidate elimination conditions with different impacts, then the ease of operation improves, but the loss of information increases due to the complexity of multiple options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of making appropriate design changesVSAvoidinformation overload
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing different levels of information detail for different user needs. Each elimination condition is presented with specific local attributes (impact on delivery date, impact on price, section to be removed) that are relevant to that particular option. This allows users to focus on specific aspects of each option without being overwhelmed by all possible information simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the elimination conditions into distinct, comparable options, each with clearly defined characteristics. By dividing the complex decision-making process into discrete candidate options with specific attributes, the system makes the information more manageable and easier to process, reducing information overload while maintaining comprehensive guidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If users make design changes without expert knowledge, then the productivity increases through faster decision-making, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to excessive or incorrect design changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of design decision-makingVSAvoidaccuracy of design changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback by presenting multiple candidate elimination conditions with predicted impacts on delivery date, price, and manufacturing. This feedback loop allows users to see the consequences of each potential change before making a decision, enabling faster decision-making (improved productivity) while maintaining accuracy (preserved manufacturing precision) through informed choice rather than guesswork

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by presenting elimination conditions with varying attributes (different sections to remove, different impacts on delivery date and price). This allows users to compare options based on specific parameters and make accurate decisions that balance productivity needs with manufacturing precision requirements, without requiring expert knowledge of the underlying technical constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11835938B2Assistance system
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 MISUMI
  • US11835938B2 patent drawing
  • US11835938B2 patent drawing
  • US11835938B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A display unit of a design assistance system highlights an error section of a 3D model and displays at least one of a designation condition recognized by an elimination condition recognition unit and an elimination section.