3D Fiber Structure Dewatering on Permeable Substrates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing 3D fiber structures, particularly 3D wood fiber structures, are energy-intensive and time-consuming, and deteriorate the bulk properties of the structure during dewatering.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a liquid-permeable substrate with a dispenser and vacuum units to apply controlled dewatering pressures and ultrasonic radiation to produce a 3D fiber structure efficiently, maintaining the bulk properties and enabling continuous production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If conventional manufacturing methods (molding, weaving, knitting) are used to produce fiber structures, then production is limited to 2D configurations and simple geometries, but the ability to create complex 3D structures with varying fiber orientations and densities is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into discrete deposition steps where individual fibers or tows are placed sequentially according to digital design specifications. Each fiber placement operation can be independently controlled to achieve complex 3D architectures that cannot be produced by conventional molding or weaving methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from 2D fiber arrangement in conventional manufacturing to 3D fiber positioning by adding the vertical dimension through controlled fiber placement at multiple layers and angles. This enables creation of truly three-dimensional structures with fibers oriented in any direction in space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If manual fiber placement methods are used, then small batches can be produced with some customization, but productivity and manufacturing time are excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Manual mechanical fiber placement is replaced with automated robotic systems that can precisely deposit fibers at high speeds according to pre-programmed paths. The automated system eliminates the time-consuming manual operations while maintaining or improving placement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing process parameters such as deposition speed, fiber placement rate, and layer transition time are optimized and controlled by computer systems. These parameter changes enable significantly faster production compared to manual methods while maintaining quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional molding processes are used, then production is faster than manual methods, but design flexibility and customization capability are severely limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing system is made dynamic and reconfigurable through computer control, allowing rapid adaptation to different product designs without requiring new physical tooling. The robotic placement system can be reprogrammed to produce various geometries, fiber orientations, and density distributions, providing both design flexibility and maintained productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If high-volume production methods are used, then manufacturing efficiency increases, but quality control and defect detection become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistencyVSAvoidprocess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated fiber placement system incorporates feedback mechanisms including sensors that monitor fiber placement accuracy, resin distribution, and structural formation in real-time. This feedback enables continuous quality control and immediate correction of deviations, ensuring consistent quality even during high-volume production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4281613B1Method for producing 3D fiber structures
Publication Date: 2026.05.13 FIBU AB
  • EP4281613B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4281613B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4281613B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method (100) for producing 3D fiber structures, the method (100) comprising the steps of: feeding (101) a foamed fiber furnish (2) to an apparatus (1), the apparatus (1) comprising a liquid-permeable substrate means (3) having a first side (4) and an opposing second side (5), a dispenser (6) having an outlet (7), wherein at least one of 5 the dispenser (6) and the substrate means (3) travel with respect to the other. Further comprising the step of dispensing (102), by means of the dispenser (6), a layer (2) of foamed fiber furnish to the first side of said liquid-permeable substrate means (3), wherein the apparatus (1) further comprises at least a reservoir (8) and a first vacuum unit (9) associated with the second side (5) of the liquid-permeable substrate means (3) so to collect fluid 10 discharge from the dispensed layer (2) of foamed fiber furnish. Further comprising the step of applying (103) at least a first dewatering pressure to at least a part of the second side (5) of said substrate means (3).