3D-Printed Flame Arrestor Channels for Dense Flow Passages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional flame arrestors are costly, time-consuming, and wasteful to manufacture, with limited channel size due to drilling or crimping processes, and often require secondary manufacturing steps to prevent channel clogging.

Innovation Solution

The use of additive manufacturing (3D printing) to create flame arrestors with recessed channels that extend through a cylindrical body, reducing material waste and enabling the formation of high-density features like small diameter channels, which are not feasible with traditional machining processes, and eliminating the need for post-manufacturing cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional drilling or crimping processes are used to manufacture flame arrestors, then the manufacturing process is simple and familiar, but the production is costly, time-consuming, and wasteful with limited channel size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical drilling or crimping processes with additive manufacturing (3D printing) technology. This substitution enables the creation of complex channel geometries and high-density channel arrangements that are impossible to achieve with traditional mechanical methods, while reducing material waste and secondary processing requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional channel patterns (limited by drilling/crimping capabilities) to three-dimensional channel structures enabled by additive manufacturing. This allows channels to be formed in multiple orientations and densities within the flame arrestor body, dramatically increasing channel quantity and optimizing flame propagation prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional drilling or crimping processes are used to manufacture flame arrestors, then the manufacturing process is straightforward, but channel density and small diameter channels are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidchannel density and size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical drilling or crimping processes with additive manufacturing (3D printing) technology. This substitution enables the creation of complex channel geometries and high-density channel arrangements that are impossible to achieve with traditional mechanical methods, while reducing material waste and secondary processing requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the manufacturing parameters from conventional mechanical process limits to additive manufacturing capabilities, enabling channel diameters and densities that were previously unachievable. The layer-by-layer deposition process allows for precise control of channel dimensions and spacing at scales impossible with drilling or crimping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional manufacturing processes are used, then secondary manufacturing steps are required to prevent channel clogging, but this increases manufacturing time and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoidnumber of manufacturing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the channel formation action during the primary additive manufacturing process itself, rather than as a subsequent secondary operation. The channels are built directly into the structure during layer-by-layer deposition, preventing clogging through precise geometric control from the outset and eliminating the need for post-manufacturing cleaning or maintenance operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a cost-effective, efficient, and high-tolerance flame arrestor with superior channel density for preventing flame propagation, reducing manufacturing time and costs, and minimizing secondary processing needs.

Implementation Method 1

printing, via a three-dimensional (3D) printer, a flame arrestor on a substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

The channels extend through the recessed surface... preventing or reducing the propagation of a flame or combustion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary Action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentUS12013116B2Flame arrestors and methods of making flame arrestors
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT REGULATOR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12013116B2 patent drawing
  • US12013116B2 patent drawing
  • US12013116B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Flame arrestors and methods of making flame arrestors are described herein. An example flame arrestor includes a cylindrical body. The body includes a first end and a second end opposite the first end. The first end of the body has an end surface. The body also includes a recess formed in the end surface of the first end. The recess is defined by a recessed surface extending inward from the end surface toward the second end. The body further includes a set of channels formed through the body between the first and second ends. The channels extend through the recessed surface.