3D Flight Space Segmentation for Accurate Low-Load UAV Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D space data generation methods for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) face challenges in reducing data processing load while maintaining accurate flight guidance, leading to potential inaccuracies in navigation and operation efficiency in urban air mobility (UAM) environments.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for generating 3D space data by dividing the flight area and restricted areas into unit areas of varying sizes based on map data, including 3D geospatial information and obstacle information, with adjustments made to unit area sizes based on flight route, speed, direction, and vehicle size to optimize flight path generation and reduce data processing load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If 3D space data is generated with high detail to maintain accurate flight guidance, then navigation accuracy is improved, but data processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoiddata processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The 3D space is divided into multiple unit areas (voxels) with varying sizes. Flight areas are divided into smaller units for accurate navigation, while restricted areas use larger units to reduce data volume. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high navigation accuracy in critical flight paths while reducing overall data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different unit area sizes are applied to different spatial regions based on their functional requirements. Flight areas require finer granularity (smaller units) for precise guidance, whereas restricted areas can use coarser granularity (larger units). This local differentiation optimizes both navigation accuracy and data efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If uniform unit area size is used throughout the 3D space, then data processing is simplified, but flight guidance accuracy near restricted areas deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing complexityVSAvoidflight guidance accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The unit area size is made dynamic rather than static. The system automatically adjusts the size of units adjacent to restricted areas based on the proximity to flight routes. This dynamic adaptation ensures high guidance accuracy near critical boundaries while maintaining simpler processing in less critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spatial resolution parameter (unit area size) is changed based on location and context. Units near restricted areas and flight routes use smaller sizes for accuracy, while units in open flight areas use larger sizes for efficiency. This parameter variation resolves the contradiction between uniformity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230410666A13D space data generation method, device and computer program for flight guidance of aircraft
Publication Date: 2023.12.21 THINKWARE
  • US20230410666A1 patent drawing
  • US20230410666A1 patent drawing
  • US20230410666A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A 3D space data generation method for flight of an aerial vehicle may include receiving map data for a 3D space in which the aerial vehicle flies, and dividing a space into a flight area in which the aerial vehicle flies and a restricted area in which the aerial vehicle does not fly based on the map data and dividing the flight area and the restricted area into each unit area to generate 3D space data.