3D Forming Unit Changeover for Two-Spec Steel Pipe Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing longitudinal seam steel pipe production lines face inefficiencies and safety concerns when manually changing product specifications, and automated solutions are costly and space-intensive, making them unsuitable for frequent specification changes, especially when only two specifications need to be replaced.

Innovation Solution

A three-dimensional quick replacement machine with a first and second unit, a three-dimensional frame, and a switching device that allows the units to move up and down within the frame, enabling efficient, safe, and cost-effective switching between different processing specifications by using various mechanisms such as hoisting, hydraulic, chain, or scissor lift structures to alternate their installation on a forming base.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual operations are used to replace rollers in production lines, then the production line can be shut down for replacement, but the replacement efficiency is low and safety is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplacement efficiencyVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automated hoisting machines and switching devices that operate autonomously to replace forming units, eliminating the need for manual intervention during shutdowns. The automated system safely handles the heavy rollers and performs replacements without human exposure to hazardous operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations for roller replacement are replaced by an automated mechanical system comprising hoisting machines, switching devices, and controlled movement mechanisms that perform the replacement tasks with higher efficiency and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If fully automatic roller replacement by robot is implemented, then the operation can be completed effectively and safely, but the equipment takes up a lot of space and is expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and effectivenessVSAvoidequipment space and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The switching device and hoisting machines serve multiple functions: they can switch between different forming units (first and second units), move units between storage and working positions, and perform replacements for different product specifications. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes vertical three-dimensional space within the frame structure to store and retrieve forming units. By moving units up and down in the vertical dimension rather than requiring horizontal space, the system reduces the overall equipment footprint while maintaining automated safety and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If fully automatic roller replacement equipment is used, then frequent replacements of multiple specifications can be handled, but it is not suitable when only two specifications need to be replaced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency and number of specification replacementsVSAvoidcost-effectiveness for limited specifications
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed with the capability to handle more than two specifications (providing excessive capacity), but in practice, only the necessary portion is utilized. The first and second forming units cover the required two specifications, while the system architecture allows for easy expansion if more specifications are needed in the future.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts to the actual production needs by selectively deploying only the necessary forming units. When only two specifications are required, only the first and second units are activated and positioned, reducing operational complexity and cost while maintaining the flexibility to handle more specifications if needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If manual replacement operations are performed, then equipment cost is lower, but the replacement process is time-consuming and less efficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment costVSAvoidreplacement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The forming units are pre-positioned in storage compartments within the frame before replacement is needed. The hoisting machines and switching devices are pre-configured with the necessary mechanisms. When replacement is required, the system can quickly retrieve and install the pre-prepared units, significantly reducing replacement time compared to manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables quick, safe, and cost-effective switching between two specifications in production lines, improving operational efficiency and reducing the need for extensive space and high-cost equipment, while ensuring accurate positioning and processing accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

the two sets of hoisting machines q can hoist the first unit 1 or the second unit 2 to move up and down in the three-dimensional frame k

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

The switching device p is formed as a hoisting mechanism, which is provided with two sets of hoisting machines q

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 3

the switching device p is formed as a lifting hydraulic cylinder structure, two sets of lifting hydraulic cylinders w are disposed on two sides of the three-dimensional frame k

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic Press: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 4

the switching device p is formed as a chain structure, wherein a set of annular closed chain u is disposed on each of two sides of the three-dimensional frame k

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChain: Chain

Data Source

PatentUS20240157419A1Three-dimensional quick replacement machine for production line
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 DALIAN FIELD HEAVY MACHINERY MFG CO LTD
  • US20240157419A1 patent drawing
  • US20240157419A1 patent drawing
  • US20240157419A1 patent drawing

AI summary

When changing product specifications in the existing longitudinal seam steel pipe production lines, manual operations on line are generally used to replace an entire set of rollers that need to be replaced while the production lines are shut down, or robots are used to replace rollers in a fully automatic manner, but the equipment for roller replacement by robot takes up a lot of space and is expensive. The present implementations provide a three-dimensional quick replacement machine for a production line, which completes the entire operation of specification change by providing a first unit, a second unit, a three-dimensional frame, a forming base, and a switching device, the switching device drives the first or second unit to move up and down in the three-dimensional frame, and the first and second units are alternately installed on the forming base to achieve the change of specification in the production line.