3D Gesture Interface Using Velocity Fields for Layered Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Interpreting user gestures in a three-dimensional (3D) free space in front of a device is challenging due to the lack of clear indication of engagement and determining the specific portion or hierarchical level of interaction, especially when using touch gestures.

Innovation Solution

The technology senses the movement and orientation of a control object in a 3D sensor space, defines a control plane tangential to its surface, and interprets gestures based on the normality or parallelism of movement relative to this plane, allowing navigation of multi-layer presentation trees and control of virtual objects without requiring the object to exit the sensor space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If touch gestures are used on a touch screen, then user interaction is well-defined and reliable, but the interface is limited to two-dimensional screen contact and lacks free space interaction capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction capabilityVSAvoidinterface dimensionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the interaction space from 2D touch screen to 3D free space by introducing depth dimension. Sensors detect gestures in three-dimensional space, allowing users to interact with virtual objects suspended in air, thereby adding spatial dimensionality while maintaining interaction reliability through sensor-based detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a velocity field as an intermediary between the user's hand and the virtual interface. The velocity field maps hand motion characteristics to control actions, serving as a mediator that translates physical gestures into digital commands without requiring direct screen contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If gestures are interpreted in 3D free space, then free space interaction is enabled, but there is no clear indication of engagement and it is challenging to determine the specific portion or hierarchical level of interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefree space interactionVSAvoidgesture engagement detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs velocity field feedback to provide clear indication of engagement. The system continuously monitors hand velocity and position, comparing against threshold values to determine when a gesture is actively engaged. This feedback mechanism provides real-time information about interaction state, solving the ambiguity problem in 3D gesture recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different velocity thresholds and interpretation rules to different regions and hierarchical levels of the interface. By making the velocity field interpretation local and context-dependent, the system can distinguish between gestures targeting different portions or levels of a multi-layer interface, enabling precise engagement detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the control object exits the sensor space to specify control engagement, then clear control specification is achieved, but the interaction requires resetting gestures and loses continuity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol specificationVSAvoidgesture continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuous gesture control within the sensor space by using velocity field interpretation throughout the entire interaction sequence. Users can perform sequential gestures without exiting the sensor space, as the velocity field continuously tracks hand motion and translates it into control commands, eliminating the need for resetting gestures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The velocity field acts as a persistent intermediary that maintains control specification without requiring the hand to exit sensor space. The velocity field continuously maps hand velocity to control parameters, providing ongoing control specification while the hand remains within the sensor space, thus maintaining gesture continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250383719A1Velocity field interaction for free space gesture interface and control
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 ULTRAHAPTICS IP TWO LIMITED
  • US20250383719A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383719A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383719A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology disclosed relates to automatically interpreting motion of a control object in a three dimensional (3D) space by sensing a movement of the control object in the (3D) space, interpreting movement of the control object, and presenting the interpreted movement as a path on a display. The path may be displayed once the speed of the movement exceeds a pre-determined threshold measured in cm per second. Once the path is displayed, the technology duplicates a display object that intersects the path on the display. In some implementations, the control object may be a device, a hand, or a portion of a hand (such as a finger).