3D Goods Storage with Date-Based Restowing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing three-dimensional goods storage systems face challenges in minimizing floor space while maximizing storage capacity, requiring high automation, efficient pallet handling, and integration with computerized systems, while also needing to reduce the reliance on forklift trucks and accommodate various pallet sizes.

Innovation Solution

The system incorporates a multi-level beam structure with movable lifts and satellites, featuring automated control and sensor systems for efficient goods transfer, including date-based restowing strategies to optimize storage and retrieval processes, allowing for high input and output speeds and flexible expansion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If three-dimensional goods storage systems are used to maximize storage capacity, then storage capacity is improved, but floor space occupation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidfloor space
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a three-dimensional storage structure with multiple levels stacked vertically, transforming the storage system from a two-dimensional floor-based arrangement to a three-dimensional space-utilizing structure. This allows goods to be stored across multiple vertical levels while maintaining a compact floor footprint, directly resolving the contradiction between maximizing storage capacity and minimizing floor space occupation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Extent of automation

If automated transport elements are added to improve automation level, then automation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces satellite transport elements as intermediary devices that operate on the outer surfaces of the storage arrangement. These satellites serve as mediators between the static storage structure and the dynamic transport carriages, enabling automated goods transfer without requiring complex integration of transport mechanisms into the core storage structure, thus managing system complexity while achieving high automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The transport system is divided into distinct functional segments: transport carriages that move along predefined paths, satellites that transfer goods between carriages and storage locations, and control systems that coordinate their operations. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining high automation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Area of stationary object

If passage extents are reduced to minimize space, then space efficiency is improved, but dispatch time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace efficiencyVSAvoiddispatch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates multiple vertical levels of storage passages, transforming the dispatch problem from a single-level horizontal traversal to a multi-level three-dimensional network. This allows goods to be accessed from multiple levels simultaneously, reducing the horizontal distance carriages must travel while maintaining compact passage extents, thus preserving space efficiency while reducing dispatch time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of operation

If multiple second passages or channels are added to improve accessibility, then goods accessibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegoods accessibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the storage system into multiple independent second passages or channels, each serving specific storage locations. This segmentation allows parallel access to different goods sections through multiple satellites and carriages operating simultaneously on different passages, improving overall accessibility while managing complexity through modular, standardized passage designs that can be replicated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8725287B2Three-dimensional goods storage arrangement in which the space taken up by the goods is reduced in relation to the goods storage capacity
Publication Date: 2014.05.13 TEXO APPL
  • US8725287B2 patent drawing
  • US8725287B2 patent drawing
  • US8725287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A three-dimensional goods storage arrangement includes a system of beams with a number of levels and, arranged in these and extending in two main directions, channels for goods. A lift is included together with transport elements and is controlled by control elements and sensors for automated transfer of goods. Time or date information concerning the arrival and expected dispatch of the goods influences the automated transfer of goods in order to shorten the time at dispatch.