3D Imaging Collision Avoidance System for Vehicle Clearance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current collision avoidance systems for vehicles, such as those using ultrasonic sensors and cameras, are inherently inaccurate as they fail to distinguish between objects that can be cleared by the vehicle's body and those that pose a collision risk, leading to unnecessary warnings and potential misjudgments by drivers.

Innovation Solution

A collision avoidance system utilizing a three-dimensional imaging device to map objects in the vehicle's environment, a positioning module to superimpose the vehicle's potential position on the objects, and a communication module to differentiate between impact and clearance locations, allowing for accurate risk assessment and automated or manual collision avoidance measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ultrasonic sensors or cameras are used to detect objects, then collision detection capability is provided, but measurement precision deteriorates because the system cannot distinguish between clearable objects and actual collision risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection capabilityVSAvoidobject distance and type measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from two-dimensional image data from cameras to three-dimensional spatial mapping using LiDAR technology. This dimensional enhancement allows the system to accurately determine object distance, height, and spatial position, enabling differentiation between clearable objects and actual collision risks based on their three-dimensional characteristics relative to the vehicle's geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a geometric model of the vehicle as an intermediary element. This model, which includes the vehicle's body, wheels, and ground contact points, serves as a reference framework to evaluate whether detected objects pose a real collision risk. By comparing object positions against the geometric model, the system can determine if objects are clearable by the vehicle body or if they represent actual hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system warns the driver of all detected objects, then safety is improved, but false warnings increase causing driver annoyance and potential misjudgment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidfalse warnings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of detected objects by comparing their three-dimensional positions against the vehicle's geometric model before issuing warnings. This preliminary action involves calculating whether objects are clearable by the vehicle body based on their spatial relationship to the vehicle geometry, thereby filtering out false hazards before they reach the driver alert stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where detection results are continuously evaluated against the geometric model and vehicle state information. This feedback loop allows the system to refine its assessment of collision risks by considering multiple factors including object position, vehicle geometry, and suspension settings, thereby reducing false warnings while maintaining accurate hazard detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If the vehicle body is used to clear ground objects, then no additional clearance mechanism is needed, but measurement precision of clearance capability must be high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclearance mechanism simplicityVSAvoidvertical clearance height measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The geometric model of the vehicle serves as an intermediary that encapsulates the vehicle's clearance capabilities. By modeling the vehicle's body, wheels, and ground contact points, the system creates a virtual representation that can be used to evaluate clearance potential without requiring physical measurement mechanisms. This approach maintains manufacturing simplicity while achieving high measurement precision for clearance assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3280606B1Collision avoidance system
Publication Date: 2019.01.30 JAGUAR LAND ROVER LTD
  • EP3280606B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3280606B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3280606B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a collision system and method in a vehicle that uses a three dimensional imaging device to map a three dimensional object (18) external to the vehicle. A positioning module will superimpose the position of the body of the vehicle onto the mapped object. An impact detection module is arranged to distinguish between an impact location (42) and a clearance location (40) on the mapped object. A communication module will communicate the impact location to a collision avoidance aid such as an audio or visual warning or control vehicle parameters, e.g. speed, steering, suspension, for automatic collision avoidance.