3D Inductor Structure for High Integration and Low Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional inductor structures are limited in integration level, as they typically consist of a single inductor within the entire structure space, necessitating research for improved integration to enhance performance and efficiency in wireless communications applications.

Innovation Solution

A three-dimensional inductor structure is developed by integrating three independent inductors or two inductors with non-parallel magnetic fields within the same space using multiple insulation layers and spiral conductive coils, allowing for increased coil density and reduced space requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single inductor structure is used in the entire structure space, then the device complexity is low, but the integration level is limited and space utilization is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration levelVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the structure space into multiple independent regions, each containing a separate inductor structure. This segmentation allows multiple inductors to coexist in the same overall structure, improving integration level while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes three-dimensional space by arranging inductors at different heights and orientations. By transitioning from two-dimensional planar arrangement to three-dimensional spatial arrangement, the integration level is significantly improved without proportionally increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple independent inductors are integrated into the same space, then the integration level and space utilization improve, but the risk of magnetic field interference between inductors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration levelVSAvoidmagnetic field interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different spatial characteristics to different inductor regions, including varying orientations and positional arrangements. This local differentiation optimizes each inductor's magnetic field distribution while minimizing overlap and interference with adjacent inductors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By arranging inductors in three-dimensional space with different orientations and at different heights, the patent separates magnetic field paths spatially. This dimensional separation reduces magnetic coupling and interference between adjacent inductors while maintaining high integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional two-level spiral inductor design is used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the coil density and space efficiency are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcoil density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the conventional two-level spiral design into three dimensions by adding vertical separation and multiple orientations. This dimensional extension significantly increases coil density and space efficiency while maintaining compatibility with standard semiconductor manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent arranges multiple spiral inductor structures in a nested or interlaced configuration within the three-dimensional space. This nesting approach maximizes the use of available space, increasing coil density without requiring complex manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves a higher integration level, enabling efficient use of space and minimizing interference between inductors, thereby enhancing the overall performance and efficiency in wireless communications applications.

Implementation Method 1

a first spiral conductive coil disposed in the insulation layer to form an inductor generating a magnetic field in a first direction; a second spiral conductive coil disposed in the insulation layer to form an inductor generating a magnetic field in a second direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS7667566B2Inductor structure
Publication Date: 2010.02.23 MARLIN SEMICON LTD
  • US7667566B2 patent drawing
  • US7667566B2 patent drawing
  • US7667566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inductor structure comprising a substrate; a plurality of insulation layers on the substrate; a first spiral electric conductive coil positioned in the insulation layers to form an inductor having a first direction of magnetic field; a second spiral electric conductive coil positioned in the insulation layers to form an inductor having a second direction of magnetic field, in which, the two or more inductors are independently positioned in a same 3-D space and have a good integration.