3D Input Space Pattern Recognition for Mixed Reality Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing augmented interactive input systems are limited by the ability to only track the position and orientation of physical objects, making interactions like clicking buttons or opening menus difficult without external devices, and suffer from issues like temporary loss of tracking and marker identification problems under poor lighting conditions.

Innovation Solution

An interactive input system with a 3D input space that uses a computing structure and input devices to recognize patterns within a 3D space, allowing for the detection of electronic devices and modification of digital content based on their state, and includes features like pattern recognition, transition effects, and robust marker identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If physical markers are used for tracking, then pattern recognition is enabled, but marker identification fails under poor lighting conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarker identification reliabilityVSAvoidlighting condition sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs color-coded patterns on physical markers that can be reliably identified under various lighting conditions. The system uses distinct color combinations and patterns that maintain their distinguishability even when lighting varies, allowing the camera to accurately recognize marker states without being significantly affected by ambient light changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple patterns are required on a marker, then interaction capabilities are enhanced, but the marker becomes difficult to manipulate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction capabilityVSAvoidmarker manipulability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D marker patterns to 3D physical objects with multiple visible faces, each displaying a pattern. This dimensional change allows the system to encode multiple interaction states across different faces of the same object, enabling complex interactions while maintaining a compact, easily manipulable form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The marker is divided into multiple faces, with each face containing a distinct pattern. This segmentation allows the system to recognize different states based on which face is currently visible to the camera, enabling multiple interaction modes without requiring a single large complex pattern that would be difficult to manipulate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If only position and orientation tracking is implemented, then system complexity is reduced, but interaction capabilities are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidinteraction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances tracking by analyzing local pattern characteristics on different faces of the physical object, not just global position and orientation. By recognizing specific patterns on specific faces and their spatial relationships, the system derives additional interaction information (such as which face is active) without significantly increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If pattern size is increased to improve recognition, then recognition reliability improves, but the marker becomes difficult to manipulate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern recognition accuracyVSAvoidmarker manipulability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the third dimension (multiple faces of a 3D object) to provide additional pattern recognition opportunities. Each face can have a clearly visible pattern of appropriate size for reliable recognition, while the compact 3D form factor maintains ease of manipulation. The system determines state based on which face is visible, eliminating the need for oversized single-face patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9110512B2Interactive input system having a 3D input space
Publication Date: 2015.08.18 SMART TECH INC (CA)
  • US9110512B2 patent drawing
  • US9110512B2 patent drawing
  • US9110512B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interactive input system comprises computing structure; and an input device detecting at least one electronic device displaying a recognizable pattern within a three-dimensional (3D) input space and providing output to the computing structure. The computing structure processes the output of the input device to recognize the pattern displayed by the at least one electronic device in the 3D input space; detect the state of the at least one electronic device; and modify image data by applying a transition to digital content associated with the displayed pattern based on the detected state of the at least one electronic device.