3D Location Reference System for Aircraft Maintenance Task Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft maintenance programs become complex and burdensome due to overlapping regulatory requirements, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of 3D physical locations and precise scheduling to ensure timely compliance with FAA and other maintenance standards.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a 3D location reference system to identify and manage task-loci associated with maintenance tasks, allowing for dynamic adjustment of maintenance schedules and reporting of completed tasks, providing a global view of maintenance requirements and timelines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If maintenance programs are made comprehensive to meet all regulatory requirements, then compliance reliability is improved, but program complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance reliabilityVSAvoidprogram complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The maintenance program is segmented by mapping requirements to specific 3D locations on the aircraft structure. Each maintenance task is associated with a unique spatial coordinate, allowing the complex program to be divided into location-based modules that can be managed independently and visualized separately in the 3D model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A 3D visualization system serves as an intermediary between the complex maintenance requirements and the maintenance personnel. This intermediate layer presents the requirements in an intuitive spatial format, reducing the cognitive load on operators while maintaining comprehensive compliance coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If detailed 3D location information is provided for all maintenance tasks, then task location precision is improved, but information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask location precisionVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from 2D documentation to 3D spatial representation, mapping maintenance tasks onto a three-dimensional model of the aircraft. This dimensional change allows precise location information to be visualized intuitively in space, reducing the complexity of processing and interpreting location data through graphical presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If maintenance schedules are made dynamic to meet compressed implementation schedules, then time flexibility is improved, but scheduling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime flexibilityVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The maintenance schedule is implemented as a dynamic system that can automatically adjust task timing based on aircraft availability, location constraints, and regulatory requirements. The 3D location data enables the system to optimize scheduling by considering spatial proximity of tasks and aircraft movement patterns, providing flexibility without manual complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10832182B2Method and system for managing a program relating to a product
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 THE BOEING CO
  • US10832182B2 patent drawing
  • US10832182B2 patent drawing
  • US10832182B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing a program relating to a product, the program including a plurality of program requirements for performing a plurality of program tasks, includes: (a) establishing a location reference system for a representation of the product in three dimensions; (b) identifying a plurality of task-loci in a display; the display presenting the representation of the product according to the location reference system; each respective task-locus of the plurality of task-loci being associated with a respective program task of the plurality of program tasks; (c) characterizing each respective task-locus associated with an accomplished respective program task as a respective completed task-locus; and (d) accounting for accomplishment of the respective program tasks by accounting for the respective completed task-loci.