3D Medical Image Quantification via Spatial Pattern Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual analysis of medical images is prone to errors due to human subjectivity and time-consuming, leading to potential false negatives and false positives, which can result in missed treatments or unnecessary additional evaluations, and requires highly experienced physicians, increasing workload and costs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-aided diagnosis tool that quantifies medical image volumes by providing a two-dimensional representation, defining a region of interest, generating a feature signature, and calculating similarity between image patches to visualize the spatial distribution of abnormalities, reducing reliance on human evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual visual evaluation of medical images is performed, then diagnostic assessment can be made, but time consumption increases and classification errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical visual evaluation process with an automated computer-based image analysis system. The system uses algorithms to automatically detect, segment, and classify abnormalities in medical images, substituting the physician's manual inspection with computational processing that is both faster and more consistent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The image analysis system performs self-evaluation by automatically processing medical images without requiring continuous human intervention. The system independently executes detection, segmentation, and classification tasks, providing diagnostic assistance while reducing reliance on manual screening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual classification of spatial distribution of abnormalities is performed, then diagnostic assessment can be made, but classification errors increase due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic reliabilityVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual classification processes with automated computational algorithms that systematically analyze the spatial distribution of abnormalities. This substitution eliminates human error in classification while maintaining diagnostic reliability through consistent application of detection criteria across all images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback mechanisms that allow for validation and refinement of classification results. By comparing automated detections with ground truth data and allowing for iterative improvement, the system enhances both reliability and precision of abnormality classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If highly experienced physicians perform image evaluation, then detection accuracy improves, but workload and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidphysician workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes the need for highly experienced physicians performing manual evaluation with an automated image analysis system. This system maintains high detection accuracy through sophisticated algorithms while dramatically reducing the workload on physicians, allowing them to focus on complex cases rather than routine screening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated analysis system acts as an intermediary between the medical image and the final diagnosis. It processes images objectively and provides results that assist physicians, reducing the direct burden on physicians while maintaining or improving detection accuracy through consistent application of diagnostic criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If manual screening is performed, then diagnostic assessment can be made, but false negatives and false positives increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic reliabilityVSAvoiddetection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual screening with automated image analysis that applies consistent detection criteria throughout. This substitution reduces both false negatives and false positives by eliminating human variability in interpretation while maintaining high detection precision through systematic analysis of image features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes detection parameters and thresholds to balance sensitivity and specificity. By carefully tuning the parameters of the automated analysis system, it achieves high detection precision while minimizing false positives and false negatives, providing reliable diagnostic results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11430119B2Spatial distribution of pathological image patterns in 3D image data
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US11430119B2 patent drawing
  • US11430119B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and for quantifying a three-dimensional medical image volume are provided. An embodiment of the method includes: providing a two-dimensional representation image based on the medical image volume; defining a region of interest in the two-dimensional representation image; generating a feature signature for the region of interest; defining a plurality of two-dimensional image patches in the medical image volume; calculating, for each of the image patches, a degree of similarity between the region of interest and the respective image patch on the basis of the feature signature; visualizing the degrees of similarities.