3D Memory Array Cavities with Shared Etching for Alignment Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Forming different sets of cavities with distinct operations in memory manufacturing is associated with high processing costs and potential misalignment issues in three-dimensional memory arrays.

Innovation Solution

A set of multiple cavities is formed through shared material removal operations, with different subsets used to create various features, including sacrificial regions with openings for electrical contacts, and these cavities are subsequently isolated to reduce the number of operations and improve manufacturing precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If different sets of cavities are formed with respective distinct operations, then various features can be created, but processing costs increase and misalignment issues occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature creation capabilityVSAvoidcavity alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple cavity formation operations into a single shared material removal operation. A first set of cavities and a second set of cavities are formed simultaneously through the same etching process, eliminating the need for separate operations. This merging approach directly resolves the contradiction by maintaining feature creation versatility while eliminating misalignment issues that arise from multiple distinct operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The shared material removal operation serves multiple functions: it forms both the first set of cavities and the second set of cavities simultaneously. This universal operation replaces what would traditionally require separate specialized operations, thereby reducing processing costs and ensuring alignment consistency while maintaining the ability to create various cavity types for different features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If different sets of cavities are formed with respective distinct operations, then various features can be created, but processing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature creation capabilityVSAvoidprocessing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple cavity formation operations into one shared material removal operation. By performing both the first set of cavity formation and the second set of cavity formation in a single etching process, the number of processing steps is reduced, leading to lower processing costs while still enabling the creation of various memory device features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The shared material removal operation continuously forms both sets of cavities in one uninterrupted process. This continuous action eliminates the need to stop, reconfigure, and restart operations for different cavity types, thereby reducing processing time and costs while maintaining versatility in feature creation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple material removal operations are performed, then different cavity features can be created, but the number of operations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavity feature varietyVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the formation of the first set of cavities and the second set of cavities into a single material removal operation. This combining of operations increases manufacturing efficiency by reducing the total number of steps required, while the subsequent selective isolation processes enable the creation of diverse cavity features needed for different memory device components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces processing costs and improves process margins by minimizing misalignment, enhancing the manufacturing efficiency of three-dimensional memory devices.

Implementation Method 1

An etch operation may then be performed to form a set of cavities and openings through the stack of layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching:

Data Source

PatentUS12519060B2Techniques for concurrently-formed cavities in three-dimensional memory arrays
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12519060B2 patent drawing
  • US12519060B2 patent drawing
  • US12519060B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for techniques for concurrently-formed cavities in three-dimensional memory arrays are described. As part of forming a memory die, a plurality of cavities may be formed by a set of one or more material removal operations, and different subsets of the plurality of cavities may be used to form different features of the memory die. In some examples, a sacrificial region may be formed in accordance with one or more material addition or removal operations, and such a sacrificial region may include openings that support the formation of various structures of a memory device. After the formation of such structures, the sacrificial region may be isolated from an active region by merging a subset of the previously-formed plurality of cavities.