3D Memory Top Select Gate Segmentation for Signal Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Planar memory cell technologies face challenges in scaling due to limitations in feature size and increasing costs, leading to density constraints, which can be addressed by transitioning to a three-dimensional (3D) memory architecture.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor device with a stack structure of alternating insulating layers and word line layers, featuring a top select gate (TSG) layer divided by a separation structure into sub-layers, with conductive layers positioned between these sub-layers, and channel structures extending through the stack to enhance memory density and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If planar memory cells are scaled to smaller sizes by improving process technology, then memory density is improved, but fabrication complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar (2D) memory cell architecture to a three-dimensional stacked architecture. Memory cells are arranged vertically in multiple layers with alternating insulating and word line layers, allowing density scaling without proportionally increasing fabrication complexity. This vertical stacking enables continued density improvement while maintaining process feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The memory array is divided into multiple independent sections separated by separation structures that extend through the stacked layers. Each section can be independently fabricated and operated, allowing complex 3D structures to be built using repeated, standardized fabrication steps rather than monolithic complex processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If feature sizes of memory cells are reduced to increase density, then memory density is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By stacking memory cells vertically instead of reducing lateral feature sizes, the patent achieves density improvement without the exponential cost increase associated with sub-10nm planar scaling. The vertical dimension provides a cost-effective path to higher density using existing fabrication capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the scaling parameter from lateral dimension reduction to vertical layer multiplication. Instead of making individual cells smaller (which increases manufacturing difficulty), the design multiplies the number of cell layers, utilizing standard thin-film deposition and etching processes that remain cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If a 3D memory architecture is implemented to increase density, then memory density is improved, but voltage drop and signal delay increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidsignal integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Conductive layers are introduced as intermediary elements between the separation structures and the memory cell components. These conductive layers provide low-resistance electrical pathways that connect word lines and select gates across multiple stacked layers, reducing voltage drop and maintaining signal integrity despite the increased vertical distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the voltage drop and signal delay problems from the memory cell operation by introducing dedicated conductive interconnect layers. These separate interconnect layers handle the electrical signaling function, allowing the memory cell stack to focus on storage while signal integrity is maintained through optimized conductive pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If separation structures are used to divide the top select gate layer into sub-layers, then independent operation of memory sections is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent section operationVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The top select gate layer is segmented into multiple sub-layers by separation structures that extend through the stack. This segmentation allows different sections of the memory array to be independently addressed and operated, providing versatility while using a regular, repeating structural pattern that manages complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240081069A1Three-dimensional memory device and method of forming the same
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 YANGTZE MEMORY TECH CO LTD
  • US20240081069A1 patent drawing
  • US20240081069A1 patent drawing
  • US20240081069A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an aspect of the disclosure, a semiconductor device is provided. The semiconductor device includes a stack structure of alternating insulating layers and word line layers, a first top select gate (TSG) layer over the stack structure, and a separation structure extending through the first TSG layer, where the first TSG layer is divided by the separation structure into a first sub TSG layer and a second sub TSG layer. The semiconductor device includes a conductive layer positioned between the first sub TSG layer and the separation structure, and between the second sub TSG layer and the separation structure.