3D Memory-Logic Integration for Compact DRAM Contact Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microelectronic device designers face challenges in reducing the size and improving the performance of memory devices, such as DRAM, due to processing conditions and the configuration of control logic devices, which limit the reduction of feature size and performance enhancements like faster speed and lower power consumption.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming microelectronic devices with array regions, digit line exit regions, word line exit regions, and socket regions, using conductive and insulative materials, and forming contact structures to facilitate electrical connections between digit lines, word lines, and control logic devices, allowing for vertical offsetting of control logic devices within the array regions to improve integration and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If control logic devices are formed using conventional processing conditions, then the memory array can be fabricated, but the control logic device configurations and performance are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol logic device performanceVSAvoidcontrol logic device configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by vertically offsetting control logic devices relative to the memory array in the third dimension (Z-axis). Instead of expanding control logic devices horizontally within the same plane, the invention stacks them at different vertical levels, allowing multiple control logic devices to coexist without increasing the horizontal footprint. This vertical stacking enables more complex control logic configurations and improved performance while maintaining compatibility with conventional processing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If the horizontal footprint of control logic devices is reduced, then memory device size decreases, but contact structure alignment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory device horizontal footprintVSAvoidcontact structure alignment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the alignment complexity issue by transitioning from two-dimensional planar alignment to three-dimensional vertical alignment. Control logic devices are positioned at different vertical offsets relative to the memory array, with contact structures extending through intermediate layers to establish electrical connections. This vertical stacking approach reduces the horizontal footprint while managing alignment complexity through standardized via and contact formation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate structural elements (such as dielectric layers, conductive vias, and contact structures) that act as mediators between the vertically offset control logic devices and the memory array. These intermediary structures facilitate electrical connections while absorbing some of the alignment complexity, allowing the control logic devices to be vertically offset without directly increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of moving object

If feature dimensions are reduced to increase integration density, then device compactness improves, but processing conditions become more constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature sizeVSAvoidprocessing condition flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent circumvents processing constraints by utilizing the vertical dimension for device differentiation rather than relying solely on horizontal feature scaling. Control logic devices and memory cells are formed using similar processing conditions but are positioned at different vertical levels and have different horizontal footprints. This approach allows increased integration density through vertical stacking while maintaining processing condition flexibility, as the same fabrication processes can form structures at multiple vertical levels without requiring extreme miniaturization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11930634B2Methods of forming microelectronic devices
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11930634B2 patent drawing
  • US11930634B2 patent drawing
  • US11930634B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forming a microelectronic device comprises forming a microelectronic device structure comprising memory cells, digit lines, word lines, and at least one isolation material covering and surrounding the memory cells, the digit lines, and the word lines. An additional microelectronic device structure comprising control logic devices and at least one additional isolation material covering and surrounding the control logic devices is formed. The additional microelectronic device structure is attached to the microelectronic device structure. Contact structures are formed to extend through the at least one isolation material and the at least one additional isolation material. Some of the contact structures are coupled to some of the digit lines and some of the control logic devices. Some other of the contact structures are coupled to some of the word lines and some other of the control logic devices. Microelectronic devices, electronic systems, and additional methods are also described.