3D Charge-Trap Memory with Negative Capacitance Channel Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Planar memory cell technologies face challenges in scaling due to size limitations and increasing costs, necessitating a transition to three-dimensional memory architectures to enhance memory density.

Innovation Solution

A three-dimensional memory device is designed with a channel structure and control gate structure, incorporating a negative capacitance insulating layer made of HfZrOx, PbZrTiOx, BiFeO3, or PVDF-TrFE copolymer, and a charge trap structure with silicon oxide, silicon nitride, and silicon oxide layers, along with control gate layers and select gates to improve performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If planar memory cells are scaled to smaller sizes by improving process technology and circuit design, then memory density is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar (2D) memory cell architecture to three-dimensional (3D) memory architecture. The memory array is arranged in multiple stacked layers with word lines extending in first and second directions, and bit lines connecting to memory cells across different layers. This vertical stacking approach increases memory density without requiring further reduction of feature sizes, thereby avoiding the manufacturing complexity and cost issues associated with continued planar scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If feature sizes of memory cells are reduced to increase density, then memory density is improved, but process fabrication becomes challenging and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidfabrication difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By stacking memory layers vertically in the third dimension, the patent achieves increased memory density without requiring further reduction of lateral feature sizes. The word lines and bit lines are configured to extend across multiple layers, with connection structures (such as contact plugs and via holes) providing vertical interconnections. This approach maintains manufacturable feature sizes while achieving higher density through architectural innovation rather than continued miniaturization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Quantity of substance

If planar memory scaling continues to achieve upper density limits, then manufacturing cost increases, but switching to 3D architecture requires complex control gate structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidcontrol gate structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements control gate structures that extend in both first and second directions to control memory cells across multiple stacked layers. Word lines extend in the first direction and bit lines extend in the second direction, with control gates positioned to control access to memory cells in different layers. While this creates a more complex control structure compared to planar architecture, it enables significantly higher memory density through vertical stacking, making the complexity worthwhile for achieving the upper density limits that planar scaling cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables voltage amplification and power reduction, enhancing the performance of the memory device by overcoming the density limitations of planar memory cells.

Implementation Method 1

incorporating a negative capacitance insulating layer made of HfZrOx, PbZrTiOx, BiFeO3, or PVDF-TrFE copolymer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative capacitance:

Implementation Method 2

a charge trap structure with silicon oxide, silicon nitride, and silicon oxide layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharge trapping:

Data Source

PatentUS11832446B2Three-dimensional memory device
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US11832446B2 patent drawing
  • US11832446B2 patent drawing
  • US11832446B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A three-dimensional (3D) memory device includes a channel structure extending along a first direction and a control gate structure extending along a second direction around the channel structure. Preferably, channel structure includes a negative capacitance (NC) insulating layer, a charge trap structure, and a channel layer, in which the NC insulating layer includes HfZrOx and the charge trap structure includes a blocking layer, a charge trap layer, and a tunneling layer.