3D Microstructure File Format for Dense Wireframe Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 3D printing technologies face challenges in directly printing extremely dense microstructures such as fur, feather, or woven fabric due to the lack of efficient digital representation of CAD models with fine material structure, leading to large file sizes and computational inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a new file format, MESO (.MESO or .meso), which provides an advanced interface for designers and 3D printers, enabling efficient workflows for computational design and data transfer by representing 3D microstructures with a data structure comprising node information, wire information, shell information, and parameters for thickness, shape, and twist, allowing for the precise representation and printing of intricate features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional CAD models with triangulated mesh are used to represent dense microstructures, then geometric fidelity is improved, but file size becomes extremely large and processing becomes computationally expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric fidelityVSAvoidfile size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the microstructure representation into hierarchical levels: macro-geometry defined by coarse mesh and micro-structures defined by procedural parameters. This allows the model to capture fine details without explicitly representing every microscopic element, thereby reducing file size while maintaining geometric fidelity at the relevant scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the representation from explicit geometric data (millions of triangles) to parametric definitions (material properties, structural parameters, procedural rules). By changing from a static mesh to a parametric model, the system can generate high-fidelity microstructures through algorithms rather than storing exhaustive geometric data, dramatically reducing file size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional CAD models with triangulated mesh are used to represent dense microstructures, then geometric fidelity is improved, but processing time increases due to computational expense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric fidelityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational work by defining procedural generation rules and material models before the actual printing process. The slicing software uses these pre-defined parameters to efficiently generate toolpaths without needing to process exhaustive mesh data, thereby reducing processing time while maintaining geometric fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical approach of processing large mesh files with a computational approach using procedural generation and parametric modeling. Instead of manipulating millions of triangular elements, the system uses algorithms to generate microstructures on-the-fly from compact parametric definitions, dramatically reducing computational burden and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If high-resolution 3D printing is used to print extremely dense microstructures, then manufacturing precision is improved, but material usage and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting resolutionVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent explicitly models porous and lattice structures as the intended micro-geometry. By designing with controlled porosity and hierarchical void spaces, the system achieves high manufacturing precision for complex microstructures while dramatically reducing material usage. The procedural generation allows optimization of pore distribution and connectivity to minimize material while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent models composite structures with multiple materials or phases at the micro-scale. By using parametric definitions of material distribution, the system can create optimized composite architectures that achieve desired mechanical properties with minimal material usage, leveraging the high resolution printing capability to create complex multi-material microstructures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11681269B2Systems, methods and file format for 3D printing of microstructures
Publication Date: 2023.06.20 OPT IND INC
  • US11681269B2 patent drawing
  • US11681269B2 patent drawing
  • US11681269B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and new file formats are provided for printing 3D microstructures. In some implementations, a new file format is provided that defines 3D objects by a wireframe model expressed as a collection of wires. Because wires and their parameters are defined within the new file format, objects may be processed more efficiently and quickly to support 3D rendering operations. Such methods may be used to print new articles, such as eyelashes, bushes, swabs and other novel items.